Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation efficiency and its clinical importance in patients with burns

  • Medical Microbiology
  • Published:
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nine severely burned patients were submitted to reverse isolation in a mass airflow system. Their burns became colonized by Enterobacteriaceae biotypes which were not found in the patients own flora on admission. They were, therefore, probably derived from the food which was obtained from the central kitchen. These strains did not cause bacteriaemia. Suggestions to improve the isolation efficiency are made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BurkeJ. F., QuinbyW. C., BondocC. C., SheehyE. M. and MorenoH. C. 1977. The contribution of a bacterially isolated environment to the prevention of infection in seriously burned patients.—Ann. Surg. 186: 377–387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cech, M. and Hendriks, W. D. H. Accepted for publication in Burns.

  • DankertJ. ZijlstraJ. B. and LubberdingH. 1979. A garment for use in the operating theater; the effect upon bacterial shedding.—J. Hyg. (Cambridge) 82: 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • DemlingR. H., PereaA., MalyJ., MoylanJ. A., JarrettF. and BalishE. 1978. The use of a laminar airflow isolation system for the treatment of major burns.—Am. J. Surg. 136: 375–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • HambraeusA. 1973. Studies on transmission of Staphylococcus aureus in an isolation ward for burned patients.—J. Hyg. (Cambridge) 71: 171–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • HambraeusA. and RansjöU. 1977. Attempts to control clothes-borne infection in a burn unit.—J. Hyg. (Cambridge) 79: 193–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • HummelR. P., MacMillanB. G., MaleyM. and AltemeierW. A. 1970. Reverse isolation in the treatment of burns.—J. Trauma 10: 450–455.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • JarrettF., BalishE., MoylanJ. A. and EllerbeS. 1978. Clinical experience with prophylactic antibiotic bowel suppression in burn patients.—Surgery 83: 523–527.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • KnittleM. A., EitzmannD. V. and BaerH. 1975. Role of hand contamination of personnel in the epidemiology of gram-negative nosocomial infections.—J. Pediatrics 86: 433–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • LevineA. S. 1973. Protected environments and prophylactic antibiotics in remission induction chemotherapy of acute leukemia.—Cancer Chemother. Rep. Part 3. 4: (3) 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • LowburyE. J. L., BabbJ. R. and FordP. M. 1971. Protective isolation in a burns unit: the use of plastic isolators and air curtains.—J. Hyg. (Cambridge) 69: 529–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • MichelM. F. 1977. Nosocomial infections in intensive care patients: the problems and approaches to its solution.—Neth. J. Med. 20: 211–219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MoncriefJ. A., LindbergR. B., SwitserW. E. and PruittB. A. 1966. Use of topical antibacterial therapy in the treatment of the burn wound.—Arch. Surg. 92: 558–565.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • PaschJ. H. 1974. Food and other sources of pathogenic microorganisms in hospitals: a review.—J. Milk Food Technol. 37: 487–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShooterR. A., CookeE. M., RousseauS. A. and BreadenA. L. 1970. Animal sources of common serotypes of Escherichia coli in the food of hospital patiens.—Lancet 1970, II: 226–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deVries-HospersH. G., SleyferD. Th., MulderN. H., van derWaaijD., NiewegH. O. and SaeneH. K. F. 1979. Prospectively randomized trial on the efficacy of selective bowel decontamination in infection prevention in the compromised host. Preliminary results. p. 377–382. In T. M.Fliener, H.Heit, D.Niethammer and H.Plieger (eds) Clinical and experimental gnotobiotics. Also Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1, Suppl. 7.—Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • van derWaaijD., SpeltieT. M. and VossenJ. M. 1972a. Biotyping of Enterobacteriaceae as a test for the evaluation of isolation systems.—J. Hyg. (Cambridge) 70; 639–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • van derWaaijD., BerghuisJ. M. and LekkerkerkJ. E. C. 1972b. Colonization resistance of the digestive tract of mice during systemic antibiotic treatment.—J. Hyg. (Cambridge) 70: 605–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • van derWaaijD., VossenJ. M. and Korthals AltesC. 1973. Patient isolators designed in The Netherlands. p. 31–36. In J. B.Heneghan (ed) Germfree research; Biological effect of gnotobiotice environments.—Academic Press, New York and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • WhyteW., HodgsonR., BaileyP. V. and GrahamJ. 1978. The reduction of bacteria in the operation room through the use of non-woven clothing.—Br. J. Surg. 65: 469–474.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hendriks, W.D.H., Cech, M. & Kooy, P. Isolation efficiency and its clinical importance in patients with burns. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 47, 247–254 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403396

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00403396

Keywords

Navigation