Skip to main content
Log in

Pruning effects on root distribution and nutrient dynamics in an acacia hedgerow planting in northern Kenya

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tree pruning is a common management practice in agroforestry for mulching and reducing competition between the annual and perennial crop. The below-ground effects of pruning, however, are poorly understood. Therefore, nutrient dynamics and root distribution were assessed in hedgerow plantings of Acacia saligna (Labill.) H.L. Wendl. after tree pruning. Pruning to a height of 1.5 m was carried out in March and September 1996. In July and October 1996, the fine root distribution (< 2 mm) and their carbohydrate contents were determined at three distances to the tree row by soil coring. At the same time, foliar nutrient contents were assessed, whereas nutrient leaching was measured continuously. The highest root length density (RLD) was always found in the topsoil (0–0.15 m) directly under the hedgerow (0–0.25 m distance to trees). Pruning diminished the RLD in the acacia plots at all depths and positions. The relative vertical distribution of total roots did not differ between trees with or without pruning, but live root abundance in the subsoil was comparatively lower when trees were pruned than without pruning. In the dry season, the proportion of dead roots of pruned acacias was higher than of unpruned ones, while the fine roots of unpruned trees contained more glucose than those of pruned trees. Pruning effectively reduced root development and may decrease potential below-ground competition with intercropped plants, but the reduction in subsoil roots also increased the danger of nutrient losses by leaching. Leaching losses of such mobile nutrients as NO3 were likely to occur especially in the alley between pruned hedgerows and tended to be higher after pruning. The reduced size of the root system of pruned acacias negatively affected their P and Mn nutrition. Pruning also reduced the function of the trees as a safety net against the leaching of nutrients for both NO3 and Mn, though not for other studied elements. If nutrient capture is an important aim of an agroforestry system, the concept of alley cropping with pruning should be revised for a more efficient nutrient recycling in the system described here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cannell MGR, van Noordwijk M and Ong CK (1996) The central agroforestry hypothesis: the tree must acquire resources that the crop would not otherwise get. Agrofor Syst 34: 27-31

    Google Scholar 

  • Droppelmann KJ, Ephrat JE and Berliner PR (2000) Tree/crop complementarity in an arid zone runoff agroforestry system. Agrofor Syst 50: 1-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Eissenstatt DM and Duncan LW (1992) Root growth and carbohydrate responses in bearing citrus trees following partial canopy removal. Tree Physiology 10: 245-257

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdmann TK, Nair PKR and Kang BT (1993) Effects of cutting frequency and cutting height on reserves carbohydrates in Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) Walp. For Ecol Manage 57: 4 5-60

    Google Scholar 

  • Fownes JH and Anderson D (1991) Changes in nodule and root biomass of Sesbania sesban and Leucaena leucocephala following coppicing. Plant Soil 138: 9-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggar JP and Beer JW (1993) Effect on maize growth of the interaction between increased nitrogen availability and competition with trees in alley-cropping. Agrofor Syst 21: 239-249

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartemink AE, Buresh RJ, Jama B and Janssen BH (1996) Soil nitrate and water dynamics in sesbania fallow, weed fallows, and maize. Soil Sci Soc Am J 60: 568-574

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann AM, Otieno HJO, Mengich EK and Amadelo BA (1997) Growth and yield of eight agroforestry tree species in line plantings in Western Kenya and their effect on maize yields and soil properties. For Ecol Manage 91: 103-135

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson K, Fidgeland L, Maghembe JA and Högberg P (1988) The vertical distribution of fine roots of five tree species and maize in Morogo, Tanzania. Agrofor Syst 6: 63-69

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadiata BD, Mulongoy K and Isirimah NO (1998) Effect of tree pruning and pruning application to trees on nitrogen fixation by Leucaena and Gliricidia. Agrofo Syst 39: 117-128

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandiah S, Wettasinghe DT and Wadasinghe G (1984) Root influence on shoot development in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) following shoot pruning. J Horticult Sc 59: 581-587

    Google Scholar 

  • Korwar GR and Radder GD (1994) Influence of root pruning and cutting interval of Leucaena hedgerows on performance of alley cropped rabi sorghum. Agrofor Syst 25: 95-109

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J and Zech W (1998) Fine root turnover of hedgerow intercropping in Northern Kenya. Plant Soil 198: 19-31

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Droppelmann K and Zech W (1998a) Runoff irrigation of crops with contrasting root and shoot development in the semi-arid North of Kenya: water depletion and aboveand below-ground biomass production. J Arid Environm 38: 479-492

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Peter I, Steglich C, Gebauer G, Huwe B and Zech W (1998b) Below-ground interactions in dryland agroforestry. For Ecol Manage 111: 157–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Weigl D, Droppelmann K, Huwe B and Zech W (1999) Nutrient cycling in agroforestry with runoff irrigation. Agrofor Syst 43: 49–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Little TM and Hills FJ (1978) Agricultural Experimentation. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA, 350 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Matta-Machado RP and Jordan CF (1995) Nutrient dynamics during the first three years of an alley-cropping agroecosystem in Southern USA. Agrofor Syst 30: 351–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen K, Buresh RJ and Jama B (1997) Root and inorganic nitrogen distribution in sesbania fallow, natural fallow and maize fields. Plant Soil 188: 319–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlich A (1984) Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of the Mehlich 2 extractant. Communic Soil Scis Plant Anal 15: 1409–1416

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR and Sommers LE (1982) Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH and Keeney DR (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties. pp 403–430. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao MR, Nair PKR and Ong CK (1998) Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 38: 3–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez PA (1995) Science in Agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30: 5–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G and Zech W (1995) Root length dynamics in agroforestry with Gliricidia sepium as compared to sole cropping in the semi-decidous rainforest zone of West Africa. Plant Soil 170: 297–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G (1995) Tree root characteristics as criteria for species selection and systems design in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30: 125–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MJ and Munns DN (1996) Soils - An Introduction. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, USA, 480 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Ong CK and Sahara N (1989) Above and below ground interactions in alley-cropping in semi arid India. Agrofor Syst 9: 259–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Sposito G (1989) The Chemistry of Soils. Oxford Univ Press, New York, 277pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant D (1975) A test of modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J Ecol 63: 995–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Toky OP and Bisht RP (1992) Observation on the rooting patterns of some agroforestry trees in an arid region of north-west India. Agrofor Syst 18: 245–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M and de Willigen P (1991) Root functions in agricultural Systems. In: Mc Michael BL and Persson H (eds) Plant Roots and Their Enviroments, pp 324–332. Elsevier, pAmsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M, Hairiah K, Syekhfani MS and Flach EN (1991) Peltophorum pterocarpa (Dc.) back (Caesalpiniaceae), a tree with a root distribution for alley cropping on acid soils in the humid tropics. In: Mc Michael BL and Persson H (eds.) Plant Roots and Their Enviroments, pp 526–532. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M and Purnomosidhi P (1995) Root architecture in relation to tree-soil-crop interactions and shoot pruning in agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 30: 161–173

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Lehmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peter, I., Lehmann, J. Pruning effects on root distribution and nutrient dynamics in an acacia hedgerow planting in northern Kenya. Agroforestry Systems 50, 59–75 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006498709454

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006498709454

Navigation