Abstract
If the future is uncertain, optimal intertemporal decisions rely on anticipating one's own optimal future behavior as is typical in dynamic programming. Our aim is to detect experimentally stylized facts about intertemporal decision making in a rich stochastic environment. Compared to previous experimental studies our experimental design is more complex since the time horizon is uncertain and termination probabilities have to be updated. In particular the decision task is non-stationary as in real life which seriously complicates the task of diagnosing behavioral regularities. In this study we give some illustrative results and provide some general perspectives. Our main result is that subjects'reaction to information about termination probablilities are qualitatively correct.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderhub, V. (1998). “Savings Decisions When Uncertainty is Reduced-An Experimental Study.” Discussion paper No. 73, Sonderforschungsbereich 373, Humboldt University Berlin.
Anderhub, V. and Güth, W. (1999). “On Intertemporal Allocation Behavior-A Selective Survey of Saving Experiments.” Ifo Studien. 45, 303–333.
Anderhub, V., Güth, W., and Knust, F. (2000). “On Saving and Investing-An Experimental Study of Intertemporal Decision Making in a Complex Stochastic Environment.” Discussion paper No. 2, Sonderforschungsbereich 373, Humboldt University Berlin.
Anderhub, V., Müller, R., and Schmidt, C. (in press). “Design and Evaluation of an Economic Experiment via the Internet.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. Forthcoming.
Brandstätter, H. (1988). “Sechzehn Persönlichkeits-Adjektivskalen (16 PA) als Forschungsinstrument anstelle des 16 PF.” Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie. XXXV, Heft 3, 370–391.
Brandstätter, H. and Güth, W. (1998). “A Psychological Approach to Individual Differences in Intertemporal Consumption Patterns.” Discussion Paper, Humboldt University Berlin.
Fehr, E. and Zych, P. (1995). “Die Macht der Versuchung: Irrationaler Ñberkonsum in einem Suchtexperiment.” Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften 114, Heft 4, 569–604.
Gigliotti, G. and Sopher, B. (1997). “Violations of Present-Value Maximization in Income Choice.” Theory and Decision. 43, 45–69.
Güth, W., van Damme, E., and Weber, M. (1993). “The Normative and Behavioral Concept of Risk Aversion-An Experimental Study.” Working Paper, Tilburg University.
Hall, R.E. (1978). “Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Political Economy. 86, 971–987.
Harrison, G.W. (1994). “Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists.” Empirical Economics. 19, 223–253.
Hey, J.D. (1982). “Search for Rules of Search.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 3, 65–81.
Johnson, S., Kotlikoff, L., and Samuelson, W. (1987). “Can People Compute? An Experimental Test of the Life Cycle Consumption Model.” Working Paper, Harvard University.
Loewenstein, G.F. (1988). “Frames of Mind in Intertemporal Choice.” Management Science. 34, 200–214.
Loewenstein, G.F. and Thaler, R.H. (1989). “Anomalies: Intertemporal Choice.” Journal of EconomicPerspectives. 3, 181–193.
Müller,W. (in press). “Strategies, Heuristics and the Relevance of Risk Aversion in a Dynamic Decision Problem.” Journal of Economic Psychology. Forthcoming.
Roth, A. and Malouf, M. (1979). “Game Theoretic Models and the Role of Information in Bargaining: An Experimental Study.” Pschological Review. 86, 474–94.
Selten, R. and Buchta, J. (1999). “Experimental Sealed Bid First Price Auction with Directly Observed Bid Functions.” In D. Budescu, I. Erev, and R. Zwick (eds.), Games and Human Behavior: Essays in the Honor of Amnon Rapoport. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrenz Associates.
Selten, R., Sadrieh, A., and Abbink, K. (1999). “Money Does not Induce Risk Neutral Behavior, But Binary Lotteries Do Even Worse.” Theory and Decision. 46, 211–249.
Thaler, R.H. (1981). “Some Empirical Evidence on Dynamic Inconsistency.” Economic Letters. 8, 201–207.
Wärneryd, K.-E. (1999). The Psychology of Saving. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderhub, V., Güth, W., Müller, W. et al. An Experimental Analysis of Intertemporal Allocation Behavior. Experimental Economics 3, 137–152 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026589319018
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026589319018