Skip to main content
Log in

Models for commercialization of technology from universities and research laboratories

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the most admired aspects of U.S. technology has been the ability to assimilate and commercialize new science and technology. In light of the rising international competition, there has been new emphasis placed on the commercialization of U.S. science and technology developed in the federal laboratories. While research and development remains the focus of these laboratories, passage of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Act of 1980 and the Technology Transfer Act of 1986 has resulted in a means to further the exploitation of discoveries, patents, and copyrights developed within the laboratories.

The transfer of technology to industrial partners and users is a complex task for a federal laboratory. Since the interaction with industry, as well as market knowledge and assessment of the needs of business users are beyond the charter of a federal laboratory, new organizational mechanisms are required in order to obtain full commercial value from the laboratories' efforts. A study was instituted to examine selected organizational and policy arrangements for achieving the optimum commercial value from the science and technology research at the research and development laboratories sponsored and funded by the U.S. government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Burgelman, R.A. and L.R. Sayles,Inside Corporate Innovation, FreePress, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, J., “Bring on the Wild and Crazy People”,Forbes, Vol. 137, No. 9, 1986, pp. 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birch, D.L., “The Atomization of America”,Inc, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1987, pp. 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Birch, D.L. and S.J. MacCraken, “The Role Played by High Technology Firms in Job Creation”, MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Changes, Cambridge, Mass., 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mosbacher, C.J., “$125 billion for R&D in the USA in 1987”,Research and Development, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1987, pp 68–70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Congress, Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980, Public Law 96-480, Second Session, 1980.

  7. U.S. Congress, Technology Transfer Act of 1986, Public Law 99-502, Second Session, 1986.

  8. Allen, T.J. and S. Cooney, “Institutional Roles in Technology Transfer”,R&D Management. Vol. 4, No. 1, 1973, pp. 41–51.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Allen, T.J., D.B. Hyman, and D.L. Pinckney, “Transferring Technology to the Small Manufacturing Firm”,Research Policy, Vol. 12, No. 4, 1983, pp. 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dorf, R.C. and K.K.F. Worthington,A Study of Technology Transfer Arrangements for National Laboratories, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis, Ca., 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dorf, R.C., Worthington, K.K.F. Models for commercialization of technology from universities and research laboratories. J Technol Transfer 12, 1–8 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371357

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371357

Keywords

Navigation