Skip to main content
Log in

A standard manufacturing information model to support design for manufacturing in virtual enterprises

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manufacturing enterprises are being forced into greater collaboration with customers and suppliers in order to produce quality products in smaller batches, shorter lead times and with greater variety. Consequently, the design-for-manufacturing task must be conducted in these virtual and distributed enterprises across traditional organizational boundaries. This paper proposes the use of standard information models to support the product realization process. While extensive work has been performed in developing product data models little effort has been performed in developing a manufacturing model. The design-for-manufacturing stages are identified with their requisite information requirements. Different approaches used to model various aspects of manufacturing processes are reviewed and found inadequate for supporting the entire design-for-manufacturing task. The development of a standard manufacturing systems information model written in EXPRESS and based upon the modelling me thodology adhered to by standard for the exchange of product (STEP) is proposed to fill the void. Initial developments in this area are discussed, the model is illustrated with an example, and the potential benefits to manufacturing are reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashby, M. F. (1992) Material Selection in Mechanical Design, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, H. R. and Christopher, N. (1996) A framework for distributed and virtual discrete part manufacturing, in Proceedings of CALS Expo Conference, Long Beach, CA, 28 October–1 November., National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaitheusburg MD, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busick, D. R., Beiter, K. A. and Ishii, K. (1995) Use of process simulation to assess tolerance feasibility, in Proceedings of the SPE 53rd. Annual Technical Conference, Boston, MA, Vol. 41, 3835–3839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, T.C. and Wysk, R.A. (1985) An Introduction to Automated Process Planning Systems, Prentice-Hall, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, R. and Kornelius, L. (1996) Inter-organizational concurrent engineering: A case study in PCB manufacturing Computers in Industry, 30, 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, J. R. and Poli, C. (1996) Engineering Design for Manufacturing A Structured Approach, Field Stone Publishers, Conway, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H. (1997) How Chrysler created an American Keiretsu Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng, S., Zhang, C. and Ray, S. (1996) An architecture of component-based CAPP systems for agile manufacturing, in Proceedings of the 1996 NSF Design and Manufacturing Grantees Conference, Albuquerque, NM, February. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 175–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giachetti, R. E. (1997) A decision support system for material and manufacturing process selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8.

  • Giachetti, R. E., Young R. E., Roggatz, A., Eversheim, W. and Perrone, G. (1997) A methodology for the reduction of imprecision in the engineering design process. European Journal of Operations Research, 100(2) 277–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., Herrmann, J. W., Lam, G. and Minis, I.(1995) Automated high level process planning for agile manufacturing. Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, DE-83(2), 835–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haag, E. and Vroom, R. W. (1996) The application of STEP in the automotive supply chain. Computers in Industry, 31, 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10303-1 (1992a) Product Data Representation and Exchange– Part 1: International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 10303-11 (1992b) Product Data Representation and Exchange–Part 11: The EXPRESS Language Reference Manual, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurrens, K. K., Algeo, M. E. A. and Fowler, J. E. (1996) Beyond product design data: data standards for manufacturing resources, in Rapid Response Manufacturing: Contemporary Methodologies, Tools, and Techniques, Dong J. (ed.), Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellberg, T. and Bohlin, M. (1996) Design of a manufacturing resource information system. Annals of the CIRP, 45(1), 149–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, R. and Jayaraman, S. (1992) An integrated framework for enterprise modelling. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 11(6), 426–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, A., Ellis, T. I. A., Young, R. I. M. and Bell, R. (1995) Modelling manufacturing capabilities to support concurrent engineering. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications Journal, 3(1) pp. 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, G. R., Cutkosky, M., Tenenbaum, J. M. and Gruber, T. R. (1995) Collaborative engineering based on knowledge sharing agreements. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications, 3(2), 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G. and Beitz, W. (1993) Konstruktionslehre: Methoden und Anwendung, 3. neu überarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenck D. and Wilson, P. (1994) Information Modelling the EXPRESS Way, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleno., C., Knutilla, A. and Ray, S. (1996) Unified Process Specification Language: Requirements for Modeling Process, NISTIR 5910, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Hocken, R. J. and Albus, J. S. (1982) The automated manufacturing research facility at the National Bureau of Standards. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 1, 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlenius, G. (1984) Scientific and structural base for manufacturing. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1(3/4), 389–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sriram, D., Logcher, R., Wong, A. and Ahmed, S. (1990) An object-oriented framework for collaborative engineering design in Computer-Aided Cooperative Product Development, Sriram, D., Logcher, R. and Fukuda, S. (eds.), Springer Verlag, pp. 51–92. New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, K. (1996) 1996 IPC Market Report, The Institute for Interconnecting and Packaging Electronic Circuits, North-brook, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, N. P. (1984) Development of science base for manufacturing field through the axiomatic approach. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 1(3/4), 397–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teeuw, W. B., Liefting, J. R., Demkes, R. H. J., and Houtsma, M. A. W. (1996) Experiences with product data interchange: on product models, integration, and standardisation, Computers in Industry, 31(3) 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, D. M. and McAfee, A. (1997) The real virtual factory. Harvard Business Review, 74(4), 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, R. H. (1996) Model driven configuration and information sharing in concurrent engineering. Annals of the CIRP, 45(1), 449–454.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GIACHETTI, R.E. A standard manufacturing information model to support design for manufacturing in virtual enterprises. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 10, 49–60 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008916530350

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008916530350

Navigation