Skip to main content
Log in

Network inclusion probabilities and Horvitz-Thompson estimation for adaptive simple Latin square sampling

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Consider a survey of a plant or animal species in which abundance or presence/absence will be recorded. Further assume that the presence of the plant or animal is rare and tends to cluster. A sampling design will be implemented to determine which units to sample within the study region. Adaptive cluster sampling designs Thompson (1990) are sampling designs that are implemented by first selecting a sample of units according to some conventional probability sampling design. Then, whenever a specified criterion is satisfied upon measuring the variable of interest, additional units are adaptively sampled in neighborhoods of those units satisfying the criterion. The success of these adaptive designs depends on the probabilities of finding the rare clustered events, called networks. This research uses combinatorial generating functions to calculate network inclusion probabilities associated with a simple Latin square sample. It will be shown that, in general, adaptive simple Latin square sampling when compared to adaptive simple random sampling will (i) yield higher network inclusion probabilities and (ii) provide Horvitz-Thompson estimators with smaller variability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bellhouse, D.R. (1977) Some optimal designs for sampling in two dimensions. Biometrika, 64, 605–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, J.J. (1996) Simple Latin Square Sampling + k Designs. Technical Report No. 6–1–96, Dept. of Math. Sci., Montana State University.

  • Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., and Laake, J.L. (1993) Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W.G. (1977) Sampling Techniques, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, R.O. (1987) Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M.H., Hurwitz, W.N., and Madow, W.G. (1953) Sample Survey Methods and TheoryVolume 1, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyadat, A.S. and Sinha, B.K. (1991) Design and Inference in Finite Population Sampling, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvitz, D.G. and Thompson, D.J. (1952) A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47, 663–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessen, R.J. (1975) Square and Cubic Lattice Sampling. Biometrics, 31, 449–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish, L. (1965) Survey Sampling, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAPLE V Software, Release 2 (1993) © by the University of Waterloo. Waterloo, Ontario.

  • Munholland, P.L. and Borkowski, J.J. (1993) Adaptive Latin Square Sampling + 1 Designs. Technical Report No. 3–23–93, Dept. of Math. Sci., Montana State University.

  • Munholland, P.L. and Borkowski, J.J. (1996) Latin Square Sampling + 1 Designs. To appear in Biometrics, March 1996.

  • Patterson, H.D. (1954) The errors of lattice sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 16, 140–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, D. (1968) Sampling Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, J. (1964) Generating Functions. In Applied Combinatorial Mathematics, E.F. Beckenbach (Ed.) 67–93, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, R.L., Mendenhall, W., and Ott, L. (1986) Elementary Survey Sampling, Duxbury Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G.A.F. (1982) The Estimation of Animal Abundance, Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G.A.F. (1986) A Review of Estimating Animal Abundance. Biometrics, 42, 267–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber, G.A.F. (1992) A Review of Estimating Animal Abundance II. International Statistical Review, 60, 129–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. (1990) Adaptive Cluster Sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85, 1050–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. (1991a) Adaptive Cluster Sampling: Designs with Primary and Secondary Units. Biometrics, 47, 1103–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. (1991b) Stratified Adaptive Cluster Sampling. Biometrika, 78, 389–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. (1992) Sampling, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K., Ramsey, F.L., and Seber, G.A. (1992) An Adaptive Procedure for Sampling Animal Populations. Biometrics, 48, 1195–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. and Seber, G.A.F. (1994) Detectability in Conventional and Adaptive Sampling. Biometrics, 50, 712–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S.K. and Seber, G.A.F. (1996) Adaptive Sampling, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, M. (1987) Discrete Mathematics: Applied Combinatorics and Graph Theory, Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A. (1980) Applied Combinatorics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borkowski, J.J. Network inclusion probabilities and Horvitz-Thompson estimation for adaptive simple Latin square sampling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 6, 291–311 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009635530700

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009635530700

Navigation