Skip to main content
Log in

Intercastes, intermorphs, and ergatoid queens: who is who in ant reproduction?

  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary:

The terminology for ant females which are morphologically intermediate between “normal”, originally winged queens and workers teems with ill-defined terms, such as “ergatogyne”, “apterogyne”, or “gynaecoid worker”. The terminology proposed by Peeters (1991a) gets rid of most of these terms but fails to distinguish between sporadically occurring “intercastes”, reared due to “mistakes” in caste differentiation, and “intermorphic queens”, which are the ordinary female reproductives in many colonies of formicoxenine ants. A detailed examination of development, morphology, and occurrence of the latter suggests that intermorphic queens are more similar to ergatoid queens (sensu Peeters, 1991a) than to “intercastes”, and should not be comprised under the latter term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received 9 May 1997; revised 20 October 1997; accepted 31 October 1997.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heinze, J. Intercastes, intermorphs, and ergatoid queens: who is who in ant reproduction? . Insectes soc. 45, 113–124 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s000400050073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s000400050073

Navigation