Skip to main content
Log in

Humidity preferences of four species of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae:Solenopsis)

Les préférences d'humidité chez quatre espèces de fourmis de feu (Hymenoptera: Formicidae:Solenopsis)

  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The responses of the four fire ant species found in Texas (Solenopsis aurea Wheeler,Solenopsis geminata Fabricius,Solenopsis invicta Buren, andSolenopsis xyloni McCook) to varied relative humidities were examined. Humidity preferences of worker ants were determined with a linear gradient chamber. Workers alone did not exhibit any hydrokinetic responses, whereas brood tending workers of all species tested showed a marked preference (negative hydrokinesis) for saturated atmospheres (near 100 % RH). The responses are presumably due to the broods' hogher susceptibility to desiccation.

Resume

Les réponses variées à l'humidité relative chez quatre espèces de fourmis de feu qui se trouvent au Texas (Solenopsis aurea, S. geminata, S. invicta, etS. xyloni) ont été examinées avec une chambre gradient linéaire. Seuls les ouvriers n'ont pas montré de réponse hydrokinétique, tandis que les ouvrières soigneuses de toutes les espèces examinées ont montré une préférence marquée (hydrokinesis négative) pour les atmosphères saturées (près de 100 % d'humidité relative). Les réponses sont probablement causées par la sensibilité plus élevée de la couvée à la dessication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banks W. A., Lofgren C. S., Jouvenaz D. P., Stringer C. E., Bishop P. M., Williams D. F., Wojcik D. P., Glancey B. M., 1981. — Techniques for Collecting, Rearing and Handling Imported Fire Ants. U.S.D.A. Science and Education Administration.Adv. Agric. Tech., South. Ser., No.21, 9 p.

  • Bull E., Mitchell R. W., 1972. — Temperature and Relative Humidity Responses of Two Texas Cave-adapted Millipedes,Cambala speobia (Cambalida: Cambalidae) andSpeodesmus bicornourus (Polydesmida: Vanhoeffeniidae).Int. J. Speleol., 4, 365–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursell E., 1964. —Environmental aspects: humidity, p. 323–361. InThe physiology of Insecta, Rockstein M. (Ed.), Academic Press, New York, Vol. 1, 640 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloudsley-Thompson J. L., 1975. — Adaptations of arthropods to arid environments.Ann. Rev. Entomol., 20, 261–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edney E. B., Franco P., Wood R., 1978. — The responses ofArenivaga investigata (Dictyoptera) to gradients of temperature and humidity in sand studied by tagging with Technetium 99m.Physiol. Zool., 51, 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francke O. F., Cokendolpher J. C., Horton A. H., Phillips Jr. S. A., Potts L. R., 1983. — Distribution of fire ants in Texas.Southwest. Entomol., 8, 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley N. F., 1974. — Adaptational biology of desert scorpions.J. Arachnol., 2, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helwig J. T., Council K. A. (Eds.), 1979, — SAS User's Guide, 1979 Edition.Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, 494 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormondy E. J., 1976. —Concepts of Ecology (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 238 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKay W. P., 1981. — A comparison of the Nest Phenologies of Three Species ofPogonomyrmex Harvester Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).Psyche, 88, 25–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnies W. G., Goldman B. J., Paylore P. (Eds.), 1968. —Deserts of the World. Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 788 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosting H. J., 1956. —The Study of Plant Communities (2nd ed.). W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco, 440 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips J. S., 1934. —The Biology and Distribution of Ants in Hawaiian Pineapple Fields. Univ. Hawaii Exp. Sta. Pineapple Producers Coop. Assoc., Bull., No. 15, 57 p.

  • Pinson C., 1980. —The temperature regime in the Solenopsis invictamound and its effect on behavior. M. S. Thesis Entomology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, 74 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherba G., 1959. — Moisture Regulation in Mound Nests of the Ant,Formica ulkei Emery.Am. Midland Nat., 61, 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T., Heinrich B., 1981. —Regulation of temperature in the nests of social insects, p. 159–234. In Heinrich B. (Ed.),Insect Thermoregulation. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 326 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S., 1956. —Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Mc-Graw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 312 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E. O., 1971. —The Insect Societies. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, 548 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

A portion of the senior authors' M. S. thesis, Dept. of Entomology, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, Texas 79409.

This study was supported by the Texas Department of Agriculture Interagency Agreements IAC (80-81)-0463, IAC (81-82)-0806 and IAC (82-83)-1651. Contribution No. T-10-142, College of Agricultural Sciences, Texas Tech Univ.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potts, L.R., Francke, O.F. & Cokendolpher, J.C. Humidity preferences of four species of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae:Solenopsis). Ins. Soc 31, 335–340 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223616

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02223616

Keywords

Navigation