Abstract
From the events synthesized from the one-dimensional dynamical mass-spring model proposed byBurridge andKnopoff (1967), the relation between rupture length Δ and earthquake momentM is studied for various model parameters. The earthquake moment is defined to be the total displacement of a connected set of mass elements which slide during an event. A parameter stiffness ratios is defined as the ratio of the spring constant between the two mass elements to that between one mass element and the moving plate. The velocity-dependent friction law (including weakening and hardening processes) is taken to control the sliding of a mass element. The distribution of the breaking strengths over the system is considered to be a fractal function. The cases for severals values and different velocity-dependent friction laws with different decreasing ratesr w of the frictional force with sliding velocity are studied numerically. The weakening process of the frictional force from the static one to the dynamic one obviously affects theM−Δ relation. Meanwhile, a rapid weakening process rather than a slow weakening process can result in aM−Δ relation, which is comparable to the observed one. Although an increase in thes value can yield an increase in the upper bound of the Δ value and the number of events with largeM and Δ values, the scaling of theM−Δ relation is not affected by the change of thes value. For the cases in this study, the theoretical Δ−M relations for small events withM<1 are almost in the form: Δ∼M 1/2, while those for large events withM>1 have a scaling exponent less than but close to 1. In addition, the fractal dimension, the friction drop ratio and the roughness of the distribution of the breaking strengths over the fault surface are the minor parameters influencing the Δ−M relation. A comparison between the theoreticalM−Δ relation and the observed one for strike-slip earthquakes shows that for large events the theoreticalM−Δ relation is quite consistent with the observed one, while for small events there is a one-order difference in the two relations. For the one-dimensional model, the decreasing rate of the dynamic frictional force with velocity is the main factor in affecting the characteristic value of the earthquake moment, at which the scaling of theM−Δ relation changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aki, K. (1992),Higher-order Interrelations between Seismogenic Structures and Earthquake Processes, Tectonophys.211, 1–12.
Aviles, C. A., Scholz, C. H., andBoatwright, J. (1987),Fractal Analysis Applied to Characteristic Segments of the San Andreas Fault, J. Geophys. Res.92, 331–344.
Brown, S. R., andScholz, C. H. (1970),Bandwidth Study of the Topography of Natural Rock Surface, J. Geophys. Res.90, 12575–12582.
Burridge, R., andKnopoff, L. (1967),Model and Theoretical Seismicity, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.57, 341–371.
Carlson, J. M., andLanger, J. S. (1989),Mechanical Model of an Earthquake Fault, Phys. Rev. A40, 6470–6484.
Carlson, J. M., Langer, J. S., Shaw, B. E., andTang, C. (1991),Intrinsic Properties of a Burridge-Knopoff Model of an Earthquake Fault, Phys. Rev. A44, 884–897.
Das, S., andAki, K. (1977),Fault Planes with Barriers: A Versatile Earthquake Model, J. Geophys. Res.82, 5648–5670.
Dieterich, J. H. (1979),Modelling of Rock Friction, 1. Experimental Results and Constitutive Equations, J. Geophys. Res.84, 2161–2168.
Hanks, T. C. (1977),Earthquake Stress-drops, Ambient Tectonic Stresses, and Stresses that Drive Plates, Pure and Appl. Geophys.115, 441–458.
Huang, J., andTurcotte, D. L. (1988),Fractal Distributions of Stress and Strength and Variations of b-value, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.91, 223–230.
Iio, Y. (1986),Scaling Relation between Earthquake Size and Duration of Faulting for Shallow Earthquakes in Seismic Moment between 1010 and 1025 dyne-cm, J. Phys. Earth.34, 127–169.
Kanamori, H., andStewart, G. S. (1978),Seismological Aspects of the Guatemala Earthquake of February 4, 1976, J. Geophys. Res.83, 3422–3434.
Kanamori, H., andAnderson, D. L. (1975),Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.65, 1073–1095.
Mandelbrot, B. B.,The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, San Francisco 1983).
Matsuzaki, M., andTakayasu, H. (1991),Fractal Features of the Earthquake Phenomenon and Simple Mechanical Model, J. Geophys. Res.96, 19925–19931.
Nur, A. (1978),Nonuniform Friction as a Physical Basis for Earthquake Mechanics, Pure and Appl. Geophys.116, 964–989.
Okubo, P. G., andAki, K. (1987),Fractal Geometry in the San Andreas Fault System, J. Geophys. Res.92, 345–355.
Romanowicz, B. (1992).Strike-slip Earthquakes on Quasi-vertical Transcurrent Faults: Inferences for General Scaling Relations, Geophy. Res. Lett.19, 481–484.
Ruina, A. (1983),Slip Instability and State Variable Friction Laws, J. Geophys. Res.88, 10359–10370.
Saupe, D.,Algorithms for random fractals, Chapter 2. InThe Science of Fractal Images (eds. Peitgen, H. O. and Saupe, D.) (Springer Verlag, New York 1988).
Scholz, C. H. (1982),Scaling Laws for Large Earthquakes: Consequences for Physical Models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.72, 1–14.
Scholz, C. H. (1994),A Reappraisal of Large Earthquake Scaling, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.84, 215–218.
Scholz, C. H., andAviles, C. A.,The fractal geometry of faults and faulting. InEarthquake Source Mechanics, Geophys. Mono. Ser. Vol. 37 (eds. Das, S., Boatwright J., and Scholz, C. H.) (AGU, Washington, D.C. 1986) pp. 147–155.
Scholz, C. H., Aviles, C., andWesnousky, S. (1986)Scaling Differences between Large Intraplate and Interplate Earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.76, 65–70.
Shimamoto, T. (1986),Transition between Frictional Slip and Ductile Flow for Halite Shear Zones at Room Temperature, Science231, 711–714.
Shimazaki, K.,Small and large earthquakes: The effects of the thickness of seismogenic layer and the free surface. InEarthquake Source Mechanics, Geophysical Monograph Vol. 37 (AGU, Washington, D.C. 1986) pp. 209–216.
Turcotte, D. L. (1989),Fractal in Geology and Geophysics, Pure and Appl Geophys.131, 171–196.
Wang, J. H. (1991),A Note on the Correlation between b-value and Fractal Dimension from Synthetic Seismicity, Terr. Atmo. Ocean.2, 317–329.
Wang, J. H. (1993),The Source Rupture Duration of Earthquakes Synthesized from an One-dimensional Lattice Model, J. Phys. Earth41, 391–404.
Wang, J. H. (1994),Scaling of Synthetic Seismicity from a One-dimensional Dissipative, Dynamic Lattice Model, Phys. Lett. A191, 398–4022.
Wang, J. H. (1995),Effect of Seismic Coupling on the Scaling of Seismicity, Geophys. J. Int. (in press).
Wang, J. H., andKnopoff, L. (1991),Dynamic Simulation of Seismicity by One-dimensional Massspring Model with Fractal Breaking Strength (Abst.), EOS Trans. Suppl., AGU, April, 279.
Wesnousky, S. G., Scholz, C. H., andShimazaki, K. (1982),Deformation of an Island Arc: Rate of Moment-release and Crustal Shortening in Intraplate Japan Determined from Seismicity and Quaternary Fault Data, J. Geophys. Res.87, 6829–6852.
Wyss, M., andBrune, J. N. (1968),Seismic Moment, Stress, and Source Dimensions for Earthquakes in the California-Nevada Region, J. Geophys. Res.73, 4681–4694.
Wyss, M., andMolnar, P. (1972),Efficiency, Stress Drop, Apparent Stress, Effect Stress and Frictional Stress of Denver, Colorado, Earthquakes, J. Geophys. Res.77, 1433–1438.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, JH. A study of rupture length vs. moment for synthetic earthquakes. PAGEOPH 144, 211–228 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00878632
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00878632