Skip to main content
Log in

Purification and characterization of aβ-glucosidase (linamarase) from the haemolymph ofZygaena trifolii Esper, 1783 (Insecta, Lepidoptera)

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A β-glucosidase (linamarase) was purified 52-fold with a recovery of 27% from the haemolymph of the larvae ofZygaena trifolii, ESPER, 1783 (Lepidoptera, Zygaenidae). The final enzyme preparation was found to be nearly homogeneous on both disc polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The molecular weight of the enzyme was determined to be about 130 kDa; it consisted of two subunits of about 66 kDa. The enzyme showed an optimum between pH 4.5 and 5 with linamarin and a broad optimum between pH 3.5 and 6.5 for p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucoside; the temperature optimum was 40°C. The β-glucosidase showed a high specificity for its endogenous substrates linamarin and lotaustralin. Among the other natural and artificial substrates tested, only prunasin and p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucoside were hydrolyzed by the enzyme, whereas linustatin, salicin, cellobiose and trehalose were not. The enzyme is strongly inhibited by β-glucosylpiperidine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones, D. A., in: Cyanide in Biology, p. 509. Eds B. Vennesland et al. Academic Press, New York 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nahrstedt, A., Pl. Syst. Evol.150 (1985) 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Compton, S. G., Newsome, D., and Jones, D. A., Oecologia60 (1983) 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eisner, Th., and Meinwald, J., Science153 (1966) 1341.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conn, E. E., in: The Biochemistry of Plants, p. 479. Ed. E. E. Conn. Academic Press, New York 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thayer, S. S., and Conn, E. E., Plant Physiol.67 (1981) 617.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kojima, M., Poulton, J. E., Thayer, S. S., and Conn, E. E., Plant Physiol.63 (1979) 1022.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kakes, P., and Eeltink, H., Z. Naturforsch.40c (1985) 509.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frehner, M., and Conn, E. E., Plant Physiol.84 (1987) 1296.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hösel, W., and Conn, E. E., Trends. Biochem.7 (1982) 219–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, R. H., and Nahrstedt, A., in: Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, vol. 11, p. 635. Eds G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nahrstedt, A., in: Cyanide Compounds in Biology, p. 131. Ciba Foundation Symp. 140. Wiley, Chichester 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davis, R. H., and Nahrstedt, A., Comp. Biochem. Physiol.64B (1979) 395.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Franzl, S., and Naumann, C. M., Tissue Cell17 (1985) 267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Franzl, S., and Naumann, C. M., Ent. Abh. Mus. Tierk. Dresden48 (1985) 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bradford, M. M., Analyt. Biochem.72 (1976) 248.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Selmar, D., Lieberei, R., Biehl, B., and Voigt, J., Plant Physiol.83 (1987) 557.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Slein, M. W., in: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, p. 117. Ed. H. U. Bergmeyer, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Andrews, P., Biochem. J.91 (1964) 222.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Laemmli, U. K., Nature227 (1970) 680.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maurer, H. R., Disc Electrophoresis, 2nd edn. Gruyter, Berlin/New York 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Evans, S. V., Fellows, L. E., Shing, T. K., and Fleet, G. W., Phytochemistry24 (1985) 1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Poulton, J. E., in: Cyanide Compounds in Biology, p. 67. Ciba Foundation Symp. 140. Wiley, Chichester 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Legler, G., Biochim. biophys. Acta524 (1978) 94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dixon, M., and Webb, E. C., Enzymes, 3rd edn. Academic Press, New York 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Martin, M. M., Comp. Biochem. Physiol.75A (1983) 313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schliemann, W., Biol. Rdsch.21 (1983) 333.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ahmed, R. F., Hopkins, T. L., and Kramer, K. J., Insect Biochem13 (1983) 641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Dunn, M. A., Hughes, M. A., and Sharif, A. L., Archs Biochem. Biophys.260 (1988) 561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Itoh-Nashida, T., Hiraiwa, M., and Uda, Y., J. Biochem.101 (1987) 847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fan, T. W.-M., and Conn, E. E., Archs Biochem. Biophys.243 (1985) 361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical Co., Jap. Kokai Tokkyo Koho (JP) 107176 (1983) 389–391.

  33. Hewitt, P. H., Retief, L. W., and Nel, J. J. C., Insect Biochem.4 (1974) 197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Cooper, T. G., Biochemische Arbeitsmethoden, p. 345. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Scopes, R. K., Protein Purification, 2nd edn, p. 251. Springer, New York 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franzl, S., Ackermann, I. & Nahrstedt, A. Purification and characterization of aβ-glucosidase (linamarase) from the haemolymph ofZygaena trifolii Esper, 1783 (Insecta, Lepidoptera). Experientia 45, 712–718 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01974565

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01974565

Key words

Navigation