Skip to main content
Log in

Hypoxia as a negative reinforcing stimulus in the squirrel monkey

  • Physiologica
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Squirrel monkeys learned to avoid hypoxia by pressing a bar. Each bar-press replaced the noxious gas mixture with normal air for 3 sec. The data further indicated that O2 itself has no positive reinforcing effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. T. Kelleher and L. Cook, J. exp. Analysis Behav.6, 249 (1959).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. E. Parker, Psychon. Sci6, 111 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Hupfer and M. Maurus, Naturwissenschaften62, 42 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. J. B. Appel, Science133, 36 (1961).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. S. S. Kety, in: Selective vulnerability of the brain in hypoxaemia. Ed. J. P. Schade and W. H. McNemeny. Blackwell, Oxford 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. E. Blagbrough, J. B. Brierley and A. N. Nicholson, J. neurol. Sci.18, 475 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zwirner, P.P., Jäggi, U.H. Hypoxia as a negative reinforcing stimulus in the squirrel monkey. Experientia 33, 1180–1181 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922314

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922314

Keywords

Navigation