Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing seismic response of a 2D roller-compacted concrete dam under variable reservoir lengths

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite element method (FEM) is effectively used for evaluating roller-compacted concrete (RCC) dams, especially in high seismicity zones. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of various reservoir lengths on the seismic response of a selected RCC dam under strong ground motion effects. Six different reservoir lengths, the lengths varies from h/2 to 10h (h, the height of dam), are used within finite element models. The hydrodynamic pressure of the reservoir water is modelled with the 2D fluid finite elements based on the Lagrangian approach. The horizontal and vertical components of the 1989 Mw 6.9 Loma Prieta earthquake are utilized in numerical analyses. The non-linear time-history analyses of those six models are investigated by using Drucker-Prager material model. According to the numerical analysis, it is obvious that the seismic behavior of the RCC dams is considerably dependent on the reservoir length. By increasing the length, we have obtained higher displacement values, which exist until the reservoir length reaches the 3h; at increased lengths, the values remain stable. This result proposes that 3h reservoir length is adequate to assess the seismic response of RCC dams. The principal tensile stresses are relatively lower in non-linear analysis compared to linear analyses. However, the principal compression stresses are close to each other in linear and non-linear analyses. The results imply that the non-linear response is influential on the total seismic response of a dam, which cannot be neglected in numerical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFAD (2016) Disaster and Emergency Management Authority, earthquake department catalogue, 2007–2016. http://www.deprem.gov.tr

  • Akkas N, Akay HU, Yilmaz C (1979) Applicability of general-purpose finite element programs in solid-fluid interaction problems. Comput Struct 10(5):773–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akköse M, Şimşek E (2010) Non-linear seismic response of concrete gravity dams to near-fault ground motions including dam-water-sediment-foundation interaction. Appl Math Model 34(11):3685–3700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alembagheri M, Ghaemian M (2013) Seismic assessment of concrete gravity dams using capacity estimation and damage indexes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 42:123–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2196

  • Alves SW, Hall JF (2006) Generation of spatially non-uniform ground motion for non-linear analysis of a concrete arch dam. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35:1339–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathe KJ (1996) Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayraktar A, Türker T, Akköse M, Ateş Ş (2010) The effect of reservoir length on seismic performance of gravity dams to near- and far-fault ground motions. Nat Hazards 52:257–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calayir Y (1994) Dynamic analysis of concrete gravity dams using the Eulerian and the Lagrangian approaches. Ph. D. Dissertation. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University

  • Calayir Y, Karaton M (2005) Seismic fracture analysis of concrete gravity dams including dam–reservoir interaction. Comput Struct 83(19-20):1595–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong-shi G, Huai-zhi S, Hong Z (2005) Study on coupling model of seepage-field and stress-field for rolled control concrete dam. Appl Math Mech 26(3):355–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02440086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra AK (1966) Hydrodynamic pressures on dams during earthquakes. Berkeley, Structures and Materials. Report no. 66-2A. University of California Berkeley, California, 45p

  • Chopra (2006) Dynamics of structure theory and applications to Earthquake engineering (3rd Edition). Pearson Publishing, London

  • Chopra AK (2007) Dynamics of structures, theory and applications to earthquake engineering. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China

  • Chopra AK, Wang JT (2010) Earthquake response of arch dams to spatially varying ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:887–906

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of structures, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker DC, Prager W (1952) Soil mechanics and plastic analysis of limit design. Q Appl Math 10(2)

  • DSI (2015) The general directorate of state hydraulic works, official statistical reports, http://www.dsi.gov.tr/dsi-resmi-istatistikler

  • Duman et al (2016) Seismotectonic database of Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9965-9

  • EUROCODE 2 (2004) EN 1992-1-1: Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures—part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings. CEN, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli M (1992) Dynamic characterization of Talvacchia dam: experimental activities, numerical modelling and monitoring, Bergamo, Italy: Istituto sperimentale modelli e strutture, ISMES publication; 334. c.1 00258 6292

  • Fenves G and Chopra AK (1984) EAGD-84 a computer program for earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams. Berkeley, Earthquake Engineering Research Centre report no. UCB/EERC-84/11. University of California Berkeley, California, 92p

  • Fok KL and Chopra AK (1985) Earthquake analysis and response of concrete arch dams. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre. Report no. UCB/EERC-85/07. University of California Berkeley, California, 151p

  • Ghaedi K, Jameel M, Zainah I, Khanzaei P (2016) Seismic analysis of Roller Compacted Concrete (RCC) dams considering effect of sizes and shapes of galleries. KSCE J Civ Eng 20(1):261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0538-2

  • Hall JF (1988) The dynamic and earthquake behaviour of concrete dams: review of experimental behaviour and observational evidence. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 7(2):58–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kartal ME (2012) Three-dimensional earthquake analysis of roller-compacted concrete dams. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(7):2369–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kummu M, Ward PJ, de Moel H, Varis O (2010) Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia. Environ Res Lett 5:034006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/3/034006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei X (2010) Possible roles of the Zipingpu reservoir in triggering the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. J Asian Earth Sci 40(4):844–854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lia MC, Guoa XY, Shib J, Zhua ZB (2015) Seepage and stress analysis of anti-seepage structures constructed with different concrete materials in an RCC gravity dam. Water Sci Eng 8(4):326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maeso O, Aznarez JJ, Dominguez J (2002) Effects of space distribution of excitation on seismic response of arch dams. J Eng Mech ASCE 128:759–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arash Mazloumi, Ghaemian M and Noorzad A (2012) Non-linear seismic analysis of RCC dam considering orthotropic behaviour of layers. International Symposium on Dams for a Changing World, Need for Knowledge Transfer Across the Generations &The World, Kyoto, Japan.

  • Moaveni S (1999) Finite element analysis theory and application with ANSYS. Prentice Hall, ISBN 10: 8131529002 ISBN 13: 9788131529003, New Jersey, USA

  • Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dam and embankments. Geotechnique 15(2):139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State Hydraulic Works (DSI) (2017). Dams in Turkey II Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources, Ankara, Turkey

  • Rayleigh JWS, RB Lindsay (1945) The theory of sound. Dover Publications, New York

  • Westergaard HM (1933) Water pressures on dams during earthquakes. Am Soc Civ Eng Trans 98(2):418–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EL, Khalvati M (1983) Finite elements for the dynamic analysis of fluid-solid systems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 19(11):1657–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woessner J, Danciu L, Giardini D, Crowley H, Cotton F, Grünthal G, Valensise G, Arvidsson R, Basili R, Demircioglu MN, Hiemer S, Meletti C, Musson RW, Rovida AN, Sesetyan K, Stucchi M, the SHARE consortium (2015) The 2013 European Seismic Hazard Model: key components and results. Bull Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9795-1

  • Yeow et al., (2016) Wall building stiffness and strength effect on content sliding in Wellington seismic conditions, Earthq Eng Struct Dyn doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ege.2843

  • Yilmazturk SM, Arici Y, Binici B (2015) Seismic assessment of a monolithic RCC gravity dam including three-dimensional dam–foundation–reservoir interaction. Eng Struct 100:137–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang S, Wang G (2013) Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on non-linear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 53:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL (1989) The finite element method: basic formulation and linear problems. Mc Graw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayse Bengu Sunbul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kartal, M.E., Cavusli, M. & Sunbul, A.B. Assessing seismic response of a 2D roller-compacted concrete dam under variable reservoir lengths. Arab J Geosci 10, 488 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3271-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3271-y

Keywords

Navigation