Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of habitat on the spatial variation in fish assemblage composition in an unimpacted tropical River of Ganga basin, India

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Effects of local habitat variables on the structure of fish assemblage were evaluated from 50 sampling sites in a tropical River of Central India of the Ganges basin with limited anthropogenic disturbance covering premonsoon, monsoon and postmonsoon periods. Data were analyzed for 5,186 fish individuals of 24 freshwater fish species of conservation and fishery management interest. Out of the total fish species, seven belong to the ‘endangered’ and 8 belong to the vulnerable category. A Cyprinid, Puntius sarana, was the most widely distributed species (frequency of occurrence 76%) out of the total species in this study. We used canonical correspondence analyses to determine the influence of environmental conditions on species occurrences and assemblage characteristics. Regarding the microhabitat, hydromorphological parameters (depth and current velocity) followed by temperature, turbidity and total dissolve solid were of significant for the structure of the fish community. Conductivity was another important factor that explained the major proportion of the variability affecting fish in their habitat choice. The other local habitat variables like overhanging vegetation and land use were of secondary but significantly important for the assemblage of the fishes. Our results suggests the importance of local environment influences on the fishes of conservation importance and their assemblage characteristics in an unimpacted river and provide a framework and reference conditions to support restoration efforts of relatively altered fish habitats in tropical rivers of India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aadland LP (1993) Stream habitat types: their fish assemblages and relationship to flow. N Am J Fish Manag 13:790–806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam M (2000) Assemblage structure of stream fishes in the Western Ghats (India). Hydrobiol 430:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam M, Johnson JA, Sankaranarayanan A (1997) Fish diversity in Rivers of Northern Karnataka. Int J Ecol Environ Sci 23:327–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Bain MB, Knight JG (1996) Classifying stream habitat using fish community analysis. In: Leclerc M, Capra H, Valentin S, Boudreau A, Cote Z (eds) Ecohydraulics 2000, second International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics. Quebec City, Canada, pp 107–117

  • Bain MB, Stevenson NJ (1999) Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, p 216

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon PJ (2000) The development of integrated methods for assessing river conservation value. Hydrobiologia 422(423):413–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C, Collins AJ (1980) Introduction to multivariate analysis. Chapman and Hall, London, p 248

    Google Scholar 

  • Copp GH, Guti G, Rovny J (1994) Hierarchical analysis of habitat use by 0 + juvenile fish in Hungarian/Slovak flood plain of the Danube River. Environ Biol Fish 40:329–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis J, Sim L, Chamber J (2010) Multiple stressors and regime shifts in shallow aquatic ecosystems in antipodean landscapes. Freshw Biol 55:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edds DR (1993) Fish assemblage structure and environmental correlates in Nepal’s Gandaki River. Copeia 1:48–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer JR, Paukert CP (2008) Habitat relationships with fish assemblages in minimally disturbed Great Plains regions. Ecol Fresh Fish 17:597–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner P (1996) Microhabitat use and diet of 0 + cyprinid fish in a lentic, regulated reach of the River Great Ouse. J Fish Biol 48:367–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gido KB, Falke JA, Oakes RM, Hase KJ (2006) Fish-habitat relations across spatial scales in prairie streams. In: Hughes RM, Wang L, Seelbach PW (eds) Landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages. Proceedings of the symposium held in Madison (pp. 265–285). Wisconsin, USA, 25–26 August 2004, AFS Symposium, 48, Bethesda (American Fisheries Society)

  • Hecky RE, Muginne R, Ramlal PS, Talbot MR, Kling GW (2010) Multiple stressors cause rapid ecosystem change in Lake Victoria. Freshw Biol 55:19–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitke JD, Pierce CL, Gelwicks GT, Simmons GA, Siegwarth GL (2006) Habitat, land use, and fish assemblage relationships in Iowa streams: preliminary assessment in an agricultural landscape’. In: Hughes RM, Wang L, Seelbach PW (eds) Landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 287–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoggarth DD, Cowan VJ, Halls AS, Aeron-Thomas M, McGregor JA, Garaway CA, Payne AI, Welcomme RL (1996a) Management guidelines for Asian floodplain river fisheries. Part 1: a spatial, hierarchical and integratedstrategy for adaptive co-management. Fisheries technical paper 384/1, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • Hoggarth DD, Cowan VJ, Halls AS, Aeron-Thomas M, McGregor JA, Garaway CA, Payne AI, Welcomme RL (1996b) Management guidelines for Asian floodplain river fisheries. Part 2: summary of DFID research. Fisheries technical paper 384/2, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • Jackson DA, Peres-Neto PR, Oldenm JD (2001) What controls who is where in freshwater communities-the roles of biotic, abiotic and spatial factors. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:157–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram KC (1981) Freshwater fishes Indian region. Narendra Publishing House, New Delhi, p 551

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram KC (1999) The freshwater fishes of the Indian region. Narendra Publishing House, New Delhi, p 551

    Google Scholar 

  • Jhingran VG (1975) Fish and fisheries of India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, p 9540

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortmulder K, Padmanahan KC, DeSilva SS (1990) Patterns of distribution and endemism in some cyprinid fishes as determined by the geomorphology of south-west Sri Lanka and south Kerala. Ichthyol Explor Freshwat 1:97–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovach WL (1999) MVSP-A multivariate statistical Package for Windows, ver. 3.1. Kovach Computing Services, Pentraeth, Wales

  • Lakra WS, Sarkar UK (2007) Freshwater fish diversity of central India. In: Proceeding of the workshop on “conservation assessment of freshwater fish diversity (CAFF) for Central India” organized by National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources on 25th November, 2006 at CIAE Bhopal

  • Lobb MD, Orth DJ (1991) Habitat use by an assemblage of fish in a large warm water stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magoulick DD (2004) Effects of predation risk on habitat selection by water column fish, benthic fish and crayfish in stream pools. Hydrobiologia 527:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh-Matthews E, Matthews WJ (2000) Geographic, terrestrial and aquatic factors: which most influence the structure of stream fish assemblages in the Midwestern United States. Ecol Freshw Fish 9:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon AGK (1992) Conservation of freshwater fishes of Peninsular India. Final report submitted to Ministry of Environment and Forests, pp 137 (Unpublished)

  • Munshi JSD, Srivastava MP (1988) Natural history of fishes and systematic of freshwater fishes in India. Narendra Publishing Co., Delhi, p 421

    Google Scholar 

  • NWDA (2005) (National water development agency)/Tech.III/122/17/2004. V. http://www.nwda.gov.in

  • Penczak T, Galicka W, Glowacki L, Koszaliński H, Kruk A, Zieba G, Kostrzewa J, Marszal L (2004) Fish assemblage changes relative to environmental factors and time in the Warta River, Poland, and its oxbow lakes. J Fish Biol 64:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pires AM, Cowx IG, Coelho MM (1999) Seasonal changes in fish community structure of intermittent streams in the middle reaches of the Guadiana basin. Portugal J Fish Biol 54:235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roni P, Liermann MC, Jordan C, Steel EA (2005) Steps for designing a monitoring and evaluation program for aquatic restoration. In: Roni P (ed) Monitoring stream and watershed restoration. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 13–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosso JJ, Quiros R (2010) Patterns in fish species composition and assemblage structure in the upper Salado River lakes, Pampa Plain, Argentina. Neotrop Ichthyol 8:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar UK, Bain MB (2007) Priority habitats for the conservation of large River fishes in the Ganges River basin. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 17:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar UK, Gupta BK, Lakra WS (2010) Biodiversity, ecohydrology, threat status and conservation priority of the freshwater fishes of River Gomti, a tributary of River Ganga (India). Environmentalist. doi:10.1007/s10669-009-9237-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemer F (2000) Fish as indicators for the assessment of the ecological integrity of large Rivers. Hydrobiol 422(423):271–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1982) Fish community structure and function along two habitat gradients in a headwater stream. Ecol Monogr 52:395–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1987) A conceptual framework for fish communities in small warmwater streams. In: Matthews WJ, Heins DC (eds) Community and evolutionary ecology of North American stream fishes. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, pp 17–2400

    Google Scholar 

  • Smol JP (2010) The power of the past: using sediments to track the effects of multiple stressors on lake ecosystems. Freshw Biol 55:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer JC, Goldstein RM, Newman RM (2000) Relationship of wooded riparian zones and runoff potential to fish community composition in agricultural streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 45:492–501

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer DL (2010) Alien species in fresh waters: ecological effects, interactions with other stressors, and prospects for the future. Freshw Biol 55:152–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P (2002) Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination, version 4.5. Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Tockner K, Pusch M, Borchardt D, Lorang MS (2010a) Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems. Freshw Biol 55:131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tockner K, Pusch M, Borchardt D, Lorang MS (2010b) Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems. Freshw Biol 55:131–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tongnunui S, William F, Beamish H (2009) Habitat and relative abundance of fishes in small rivers in eastern Thailand. Environ Biol Fish 85:209–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turak E, Linke S (2011) Freshwater conservation planning: an introduction. Freshw Biol 56:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Seelbach PW, Lyons J (2006) Effects of levels of human disturbance on the influence of catchment, riparian, and reach-scale factors on fish assemblages. In: Hughes RM, Wang L, Seelbach PW (eds) Landscape influences on stream habitats and biological assemblages. Am Fish Soc, Bethesda, pp 199–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Wang J, He Y, Cao W (2011) Fish assemblage structure in the Chishui River, a protected tributary of the Yangtze River. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst 400:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki Y, Haramato S, Fukasawa T (2006) Habitat uses of freshwater fishes on the scale of reach system provided in small streams. Environ Biol Fish 75:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India for providing financial assistance and Director, NBFGR for necessary facilities and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Bureau of Fish Genetic Resources, Canal Ring Road, P.O. Dilkusha, Lucknow, 226002, India

    Vineet Kumar Dubey, Uttam Kumar Sarkar, Ajay Pandey, Rupali Sani & Wazir Singh Lakra

Authors
  1. Vineet Kumar Dubey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Uttam Kumar Sarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ajay Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rupali Sani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wazir Singh Lakra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uttam Kumar Sarkar.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Thomas Mehner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dubey, V.K., Sarkar, U.K., Pandey, A. et al. The influence of habitat on the spatial variation in fish assemblage composition in an unimpacted tropical River of Ganga basin, India. Aquat Ecol 46, 165–174 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-012-9389-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-012-9389-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation