Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of polyurethane foam, polypropylene, quartz fiber, and cellulose substrates for multi-element analysis of atmospheric particulate matter by ICP-MS

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional methods for the analysis of trace metals require particulate matter (PM) collected on specific filter substrates. In this paper, methods for elemental analysis of PM collected on substrates commonly used for organic analysis in air quality studies are developed. Polyurethane foam (PUF), polypropylene (PP), and quartz fiber (QF) substrates were first digested in a mixture of HNO3/HCl/HF/H2O2 using a microwave digestion system and then analyzed for elements by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Filter blanks and recoveries for standard reference materials (SRMs) on these substrates were compared with a cellulose (CL) substrate, more commonly used for trace metal analysis in PM. The results show concentrations of filter blanks in the order of QF > PUF > PP > CL with a high variability in PUF and PP blanks relative to QF. Percent recovery of most elements from the SRMs on all substrates are within ±20% of certified or reference values. QF substrates showed consistent blanks with a reproducibility better than ±10% for the majority of elements. Therefore, QF substrates were applied to ambient PM collected in a variety of environments from pristine to polluted. Concentrations of field blanks for ≥18 of 31 elements analyzed on a small section of QF substrate are ≤25% of the amounts present in samples for urban atmospheres. Results suggest that QF used in a high-volume sampler can be a suitable substrate to quantify trace elements, in addition to organic species and hence reduce logistics and costs in air pollution studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harrison RM, Smith DJT, Kibble AJ (2004) Occup Environ Med 61:799–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pope CA (2000) J Aerosol Med 13:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prahalad AK, Soukup JM, Inmon J, Willis R, Ghio AJ, Becker S, Gallagher JE (1999) Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 158:81–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison RM, Jones AM, Lawrence RG (2004) Atmos Environ 38:4531–4538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nriagu JO (1988) Environ Pollut 50:139–161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hochella MF (2002) Earth Planet Sci Lett 203:593–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Herner JD, Green PG, Kleeman MJ (2006) Environ Sci Technol 40:1925–1933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vallius M, Janssen NAH, Heinrich J, Hoek G, Ruuskanen J, Cyrys J, Van Grieken R, de Hartog JJ, Kreyling WG, Pekkanen J (2005) Sci Total Environ 337:147–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Witt M, Baker AR, Jickells TD (2006) Atmos Environ 40:5435–5451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Arimoto R, Duce RA, Ray BJ, Ellis WG, Cullen JD, Merrill JT (1995) J Geophy Res Atmos 100:1199–1213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pekney NJ, Davidson CI (2005) Anal Chim Acta 540:269–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Karthikeyan S, Joshi UM, Balasubramanian R (2006) Anal Chim Acta 576:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heal MR, Hibbs LR, Agius RM, Beverland LJ (2005) Atmos Environ 39:1417–1430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Swami K, Judd CD, Orsini J, Yang KX, Husain L (2001) Fresenius J Anal Chem 369:63–70

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cullen JT, Field MP, Sherrell RM (2001) J Anal At Spectrom 16:1307–1312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dams R, Rahn KA, Winchester JW (1972) Environ Sci Technol 6:441–448

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dillner AM, Shafer MM, Schauer JJ (2007) Aerosol Sci Technol 41:75–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Herckes P, Engling G, Kreidenweis SM, Collett JL (2006) Environ Sci Technol 40:4554–4562

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Engling G, Herckes P, Kreidenweis SM, Malm WC, Collett JL (2006) Atmos Environ 40:2959–2972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuduri L, Harner T, Hung H (2006) Environ Pollut 144:377–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fang GC, Wu YS, Chen MH, Ho TT, Huang SH, Rau JY (2004) Atmos Environ 38:3385–3391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Demokritou P, Kavouras IG, Ferguson ST, Koutrakis P (2002) Aerosol Sci Technol 36:925–933

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Demokritou P, Lee SJ, Ferguson ST, Koutrakis P (2004) J Aerosol Sci 35:281–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun Q, Alexandrova OA, Herckes P, Allen JO, Talanta (2009) (in press). doi 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.01.039

  25. Guo ZG, Feng JL, Fang M, Chen HY, Lau KH (2004) Atmos Environ 38:909–919

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Thermo Finnigan (2001) ELEMENT2 Operating Manual—Rev. 2—Issue 08/2001. San Jose, CA

  27. Rodushkin I, Axelsson MD (2000) Sci Total Environ 262:21–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. ADEQ (2005) http://www.azdeq.gov/environ/air/monitoring/download/ambosnogales.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2008

  29. Nizzetto L, Lohmann R, Gioia R, Jahnke A, Temme C, Dachs J, Herckes P, Di Guardo A, Jones KC (2008) Environ Sci Technol 42:1580–1585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Berg T, Royset O, Steinnes E (1993) Atmos Environ 27A:2435–2439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Arimoto R, Zeng T, Davis D, Wang Y, Khaing H, Nesbit C, Huey G (2008) Atmos Environ 42:2864–2876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank James Jones and Kristina Hausman for collecting samples on the ASU campus; Qinyue Sun and Dr. Jonathan O. Allen for their assistance in collecting samples in Nogales and for providing PUF and PP substrates; Lucca Nizetto and Rainer Lohmann (Rhode Island) for their assistance in collecting samples aboard the MS Polarstern during the research cruise in the Atlantic Ocean. We are grateful to Drs. Everett Shock and Ariel Anbar for providing access to ICP-MS and laboratory facilities. Funding for the Nogales research was provided by the Southwest Consortium for Environmental Research and Policy (SCERP) and Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871604, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1604, USA

    Nabin Upadhyay, Brian J. Majestic, Panjai Prapaipong & Pierre Herckes

Authors
  1. Nabin Upadhyay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian J. Majestic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Panjai Prapaipong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pierre Herckes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierre Herckes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Upadhyay, N., Majestic, B.J., Prapaipong, P. et al. Evaluation of polyurethane foam, polypropylene, quartz fiber, and cellulose substrates for multi-element analysis of atmospheric particulate matter by ICP-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 394, 255–266 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2671-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-009-2671-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation