Skip to main content
Log in

A fluorescence-based microplate assay to quantify DOM-induced catabolic activity

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This note describes a novel method to quickly quantify the dissolved organic matter (DOM)-induced catabolic activity from low-volume samples. The concept is based on the catabolic response profiles (CRP) assay and is described as an inverse CRP, where the reactivity of a complex and diverse mixture of organic compounds towards single strains of bacteria is quantified. A strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens was grown and then transferred to an organic carbon-free mineral salt medium. 90 μL of a fluorogenic redox indicator was added to 90 μL of the bacterial suspension in a well on a 96-well microplate. The DOM sample (90 μL) was added to the well and the fluorescence emitted by the reduced indicator was read over the period of incubation. Only 0.8 mL of the DOM sample, including controls and replicates, was required to quantify the activity of each sample. Results are presented for a surface soil DOM sample and they were compared to glucose samples of various concentrations. The detection limit was reached for samples containing as little as 55 μM of glucose (0.3 mg C L−1). The assay showed that only 9% of the total carbon of the soil surface DOM sample was readily biodegradable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Leenheer JA, Croué J-P (2003) Environ Sci Technol 37:18A–26A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy JF (2001) In: Clapp CE, Hayes MHB, Senesi N, Griffith SM (eds) Humic substances and chemical contaminants. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 429–448

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bending GD, Putland C, Rayns F (2000) Biol Fertil Soils 31:78–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Degens BP, Schipper LA, Sparling GP, Vojvodic-Vukovic M (2000) Soil Biol Biochem 32:189–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaillard V, Chenu C, Recous S (2003) Soil Biol Biochem 35:93–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ohtonen R, Väre H (1998) Microb Ecol 36:328–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pietikäinen J, Hiukka R, Fritze H (2000) Soil Biol Biochem 32:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Herbert BE, Bertsch PM (1995) In: McFee WW, Kelly JM (eds) Carbon forms and functions in forest soils. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp 63–88

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zsolnay A (1996) In: Piccolo A (ed) Humic substances in terrestrial ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 171–223

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stevenson FJ (1994) Humus chemistry. Genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marschner B, Kalbitz K (2003) Geoderma 113:211–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kalbitz K, Schwesig D, Schmerwitz J, Kaiser K, Haumaier L, Glaser B, Ellerbrock R, Leinweber P (2003) Soil Biol Biochem 35:1129–1142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalbitz K, Schmerwitz J, Schwesig D, Matzner E (2003) Geoderma 113:273–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Soest PJ (1963) J AOAC 46:829

    Google Scholar 

  15. Servais P, Anzil A, Ventresque C (1989) Appl Environ Microb 55:2732–2734

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Qualls RG, Haines BL (1992) Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:578–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van der Kooij D, Visser A, Hijnen WAH (1982) J Am Water Works Ass 74:540–545

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bochner BR (1989) Nature 339:157–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghiglione J-F, Richaume A, Philippot L, Lensi R (2002) FEMS Microbiol Ecol 39:121–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Greer LE, Shelton DR (1992) Appl Environ Microb 58:1459–1465

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Denizot F, Lang R (1986) J Immunol Methods 89:271–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chii-Shiarng C, Gee KR (2000) Free Radical Biol Med 28:1266–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pagé B, Pagé M, Noël C (1993) Int J Oncol 3:473–476

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fields RD, Lancaster MV (1993) Am Biotechnol Lab 11:48–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Abe T, Takahashi S, Fukuuchi Y (2002) Neurosci Lett 326:179–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gloeckner H, Jonuleit T, Lemke H-D (2001) J Immunol Methods 252:131–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuda T, Yano T (2003) Food Control 14:455–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Biosource Int. (2005) Biosource website. Biosource International, Camarillo, CA (see http://www.biosource.com, last viewed 5th October 2005)

  29. Lennon JT, Pfaff LE (2005) Aquat Microb Ecol 39:107–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen J, LeBoeuf EJ, Dai S, Gu B (2003) Chemosphere 50:639–647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Burdige DJ, Kline SW, Chen W (2004) Mar Chem 89:289–311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Coble PG (1996) Mar Chem 51:325–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Microbial Ecology Laboratory in Lyon, and more specifically Dr. Agnès Richaume, Dr. Patrick Potier and Dr. Lucile Jocteur-Monrozier for sharing the bacterium strain and for providing information about the bacteria. The authors also wish to thank Dr. Pierre Renault for interesting discussions on the assay, and Ghislain Sévenier for the carbon analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Dudal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dudal, Y., Holgado, R., Knoth, K. et al. A fluorescence-based microplate assay to quantify DOM-induced catabolic activity. Anal Bioanal Chem 384, 175–179 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0140-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0140-4

Keywords

Navigation