Abstract
Agroforestry has the potential to provide multiple products and services from agricultural land, including bioenergy feedstock and habitat for wild bees. Our goal is to assess how variation in alley crop composition, landscape configuration, and total agroforestry area affects wild bee habitat in Illinois. First, different agroforestry crops may provide different floral and nesting resources for bees. Second, policy and economic factors may affect the total area and configuration of land devoted to agroforestry within a landscape. Third, farmers’ operational preferences will affect area and configuration; they may be more willing to convert entire fields to agroforestry than to convert small patches within fields. We use the Lonsdorf model, a spatially explicit assessment of bee abundance, to model how wild bee habitat in hypothetical alternatives to an Illinois landscape is affected by alley crop composition (willow and row crops or willow and prairie), landscape configuration (alley cropping in subfield patches or in entire fields), and total alley crop area (12, 24, or 29% of the agricultural land). Our results indicate that the alley crop composition and area are important influences on the modeled nesting bee abundance index at the scale of both the landscape and the field. Although the configuration of agroforestry plantings significantly predicts bee abundance at the field scale, it is not an important factor when assessing bee abundance at the level of the landscape.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alessandro P, Marta C (2012) Heterogeneity of linear forest formations: differing potential for biodiversity conservation. A case study in Italy. Agrofor Syst 86:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9511-y
Arbuckle JG Jr, Valdivia C, Raedeke A et al (2008) Non-operator landowner interest in agroforestry practices in two Missouri watersheds. Agrofor Syst 75:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-008-9131-8
Bennett AB, Meehan TD, Gratton C, Isaacs R (2014) Modeling pollinator community response to contrasting bioenergy scenarios. PLoS ONE 9:e110676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110676
Berges SA, Moore LAS, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC (2010) Bird species diversity in riparian buffers, row crop fields, and grazed pastures within agriculturally dominated watersheds. Agrofor Syst 79:97–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9270-6
Brandle JR, Hodges L, Zhou XH (2004) Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agrofor Syst 61:65–78
Christoffel R (2013) Agroforestry and wildlife. In: Gold MA, Cernusca M, Hall M (eds) Training manual for applied agroforestry practices. University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry, Columbia, pp 127–137
Gold MA, Hanover JW (1987) Agroforestry systems for the temperate zone. Agrofor Syst 5:109–121
Gopalakrishnan G, Negri MC, Wang M et al (2009) Biofuels, land, and water: a systems approach to sustainability. Environ Sci Technol 43:6094–6100
Graham JB (2016) Working landscapes: transdisciplinary research on bioenergy and agroforestry alternatives for an Illinois watershed. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Graham JB, Nassauer JI, Currie WS et al (2017) Assessing wild bees in perennial bioenergy landscapes: effects of bioenergy crop, landscape configuration, and bioenergy crop area. Landsc Ecol 32(5):1023–1037
Grünewald H, Böhm C, Quinkenstein A et al (2009) Robinia pseudoacacia L.: a lesser known tree species for biomass production. BioEnergy Res 2:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-009-9038-x
Holzmueller EJ, Jose S (2012) Biomass production for biofuels using agroforestry: potential for the North Central Region of the United States. Agrofor Syst 85:305–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9502-z
Jin Y, Yang L, Danielson P et al (2013) A comprehensive change detection method for updating the National Land Cover Database to circa 2011. Remote Sens Environ 132:159–175
Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7
Jose S, Gold MA, Garrett HE (2012) The future of temperate agroforestry in the United States. In: Nair PKR, Garrity D (eds) Agroforestry—the future of global land use. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 217–245
Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH et al (2011) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kennedy CM, Lonsdorf E, Neel MC et al (2013) A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agroecosystems. Ecol Lett 16:584–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12082
Klein A-M, Brittain C, Hendrix SD et al (2012) Wild pollination services to California almond rely on semi-natural habitat. J Appl Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02144.x
Kline KL, Dale VH, Lee R, Leiby PN (2009) In defense of biofuels, done right. Issues Sci Technol 25(3):75–84
Koh I, Lonsdorf EV, Williams NM et al (2016) Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:140–145. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517685113
Larcher F, Baudry J (2013) Landscape grammar: a method to analyse and design hedgerows and networks. Agrofor Syst 87:181–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-012-9534-4
Lassoie JP, Buck LE, Current DA (2009) The development of agroforestry as an integrated land use mangement system. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1–24
Lin BB (2011) Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental change. Bioscience 61:183–193. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.3.4
Lonsdorf E, Kremen C, Ricketts T et al (2009) Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes. Ann Bot 103:1589–1600. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp069
Lonsdorf E, Ricketts T, Kremen C et al (2011) Crop pollination services. In: Kareiva P, Tallis H, Ricketts TH et al (eds) Natural capital: theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 168–187
Love BJ, Nejadhashemi AP (2011) Water quality impact assessment of large-scale biofuel crops expansion in agricultural regions of Michigan. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2200–2216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.041
Lovell ST, Mendez VE, Erickson DL et al (2010) Extent, pattern, and multifunctionality of treed habitats on farms in Vermont, USA. Agrofor Syst 80:153–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-010-9328-5
M’Gonigle LK, Ponisio LC, Cutler K, Kremen C (2015) Habitat restoration promotes pollinator persistence and colonization in intensively managed agriculture. Ecol Appl 25:1557–1565. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1863.1
Mattia CM, Lovell ST, Davis A (2016) Identifying barriers and motivators for adoption of multifunctional perennial cropping systems by landowners in the Upper Sangamon River Watershed, Illinois. Agrofor Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0053-6
Meehan TD, Gratton C, Diehl E et al (2013) Ecosystem-service tradeoffs associated with switching from annual to perennial energy crops in riparian zones of the US Midwest. PLoS ONE 8:e80093. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080093
Morandin LA, Kremen C (2013) Hedgerow restoration promotes pollinator populations and exports native bees to adjacent fields. Ecol Appl 23:829–839
Nair PKR, Allen S, Bannister M (2005) Agroforestry today: an analysis of the 750 presentations to the 1st World Congress of Agroforestry, 2004. J For 103:417–421
Olsson O, Bolin A, Smith HG, Lonsdorf EV (2015) Modeling pollinating bee visitation rates in heterogeneous landscapes from foraging theory. Ecol Modell 316:133–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.08.009
Ostaff DP, Mosseler A, Johns RC et al (2015) Willows (Salix spp.) as pollen and nectar sources for sustaining fruit and berry pollinating insects. Can J Plant Sci 95:505–516. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2014-339
Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C et al (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007
Qureshi N, Liu S, Ezeji TC (2013) Cellulosic Butanol production from agricultural biomass and residues: recent advances in technology. In: Lee JW (ed) Advanced biofuels and bioproducts. SE - 15. Springer, New York, pp 247–265
R Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Ricketts TH, Regetz J, Steffan-Dewenter I et al (2008) Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns? Ecol Lett 11:499–515. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01157.x
Robertson GP, Dale VH, Doering OC et al (2008) Sustainable biofuels redux. Science 322:49–50
Rowe RL, Hanley ME, Goulson D et al (2011) Potential benefits of commercial willow Short Rotation Coppice (SRC) for farm-scale plant and invertebrate communities in the agri-environment. Biomass Bioenergy 35:325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.046
Schultz RC, Isenhart TM, Simpkins WW, Colletti JP (2004) Riparian forest buffers in agroecosystems—lessons learned from the Bear Creek Watershed, central Iowa, USA. Agrofor Syst 61–62:35–50. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:AGFO.0000028988.67721.4d
Smith J, Pearce BD, Wolfe MS (2012a) Reconciling productivity with protection of the environment: is temperate agroforestry the answer? Renew Agric Food Syst 28:80–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170511000585
Smith J, Pearce BD, Wolfe MS (2012b) A European perspective for developing modern multifunctional agroforestry systems for sustainable intensification. Renew Agric Food Syst 27:323–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170511000597
Smith VH, McBride RC, Shurin JB et al (2015) Crop diversification can contribute to disease risk control in sustainable biofuels production. Front Ecol Environ 13:561–567. https://doi.org/10.1890/150094
Ssegane H, Negri MC, Quinn J, Urgun-Demirtas M (2015) Multifunctional landscapes: site characterization and field-scale design to incorporate biomass production into an agricultural system. Biomass Bioenergy 80:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.04.012
Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1998) Plant diversity and arthropod communities: implications for temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 39:73–89
Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133306
Tomich TP, Brodt S, Ferris H et al (2011) Agroecology: a review from a global-change perspective. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:193–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012110-121302
Valdivia C, Gold MA, Zabek L et al (2009) Human and institutional dimensions of agroforestry. In: Garrett HE (ed) North American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 339–366
Varah A, Jones H, Smith J, Potts SG (2013) Enhanced biodiversity and pollination in UK agroforestry systems. J Sci Food Agric 93(9):2073–2075. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6148
Wolz KJ, DeLucia EH (2018) Alley cropping: global patterns of species composition and function. Agric Ecosyst Environ 252:61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.005
Acknowledgements
This project was funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technologies Office. We would like to thank WS Currie, J Vandermeer, MC Negri, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier draft.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Graham, J.B., Nassauer, J.I. Wild bee abundance in temperate agroforestry landscapes: Assessing effects of alley crop composition, landscape configuration, and agroforestry area. Agroforest Syst 93, 837–850 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0179-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0179-1