Abstract
Antenna near-field effects are one of the accuracy limiting factors on GNSS-based distance measurements. In order to analyse these influences, a measurement campaign at an EDM calibration baseline site with optimum GNSS conditions was performed. To vary the distance between the antenna mount and the absolutely calibrated antennas, spacers with different lengths were used. Due to the comparison of the resulting GNSS-based distance measurements to a reference solution, the influences of the antenna near-field could be analyzed.
The standard deviations of the differences to the reference solution, i. e., 0.31 mm for the distance and 0.46 mm for the height component, indicate that equal spacer and antenna combinations at both stations lead to a very high accuracy level. In contrast, different spacer and antenna combinations decrease the accuracy level. Thus, an identical set-up at both antenna stations and the usage of individually calibrated antennas minimize the near-field effects during the double-differencing process. Hence, these aspects can be identified as a prerequisite for highly accurate GNSS-measurements.
In addition to near-field effects, the influence of satellite obstructions is investigated. Four realistic shadowing scenarios are numerically simulated on the basis of the observations, which were collected in the optimum surrounding of the EDM calibration baseline site. The comparison to nominal values indicates that a shadowing leads only to a slight decreasing of the accuracy. Consequently, there is a strong suspicion that multipath effects and signal distortions seem to have a greater influence on the accuracy of GNSS-based distance measurements than the satellite constellation.
Acknowledgement
These investigations are performed within the joint research project SIB60 “Surveying” of the European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP). The EMRP is jointly funded by the EMRP participating countries within EURAMET and the European Union.
References
[1] Baire, Q., Bruyninx, C., Legrand, J., Pottiaux, E., Aerts, W., Defraigne, P., Bergeot, N., Chevalier, J. M., (2014). Influence of different GPS receiver antenna calibration models on geodetic positioning. GPS Solutions, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 529–539.10.1007/s10291-013-0349-1Search in Google Scholar
[2] Dilssner, F., Seeber, G., Wübbena, G., Schmitz, M., (2008). Impact of Near-Field Effects on the GNSS Position Solution. In: Proceedings of the 21st International technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GNSS 2008), Savannah, Georgia, September 16–19, pp. 612–624.Search in Google Scholar
[3] Geiger, A., (1988). Einfluss und Bestimmung der Variabilität des Phasenzentrums von GPS-Antennen. Mitteilung des IGP der ETH Zürich, No. 43, Zurich, Institut für Geodäsie und Photogrammetrie an der ETH-Zürich.Search in Google Scholar
[4] Groves, P., (2011). Shadow matching: A new GNSS positioning technique for urban canyons. Journal of Navigation,Vol. 64, Nr. 3, pp. 417–430.10.1017/S0373463311000087Search in Google Scholar
[5] Heister, H., (2012). Die neue Kalibrierbasis der UniBW München. Allgemeine Vermessungsnachrichten (AVN), Vol. 10, pp. 336–343.Search in Google Scholar
[6] Heunecke, O., (2012). Auswertung des Ringversuchs auf der neuen Kalibrierbasis der UniBW München zur Bestimmung der Sollstrecken. Allgemeine Vermessungsnachrichten (AVN), Vol. 11–12, pp. 380–385.Search in Google Scholar
[7] Hofmann-Wellenhof, B., Lichtenegger, H., Wasle, E., (2008). GNSS-Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo & more. Springer, Wien.Search in Google Scholar
[8] Schmitz, M., (2004). Near-Field Effects of a Car Roof on TPSHIPER_PLUS Phase Variations. GEO++ White Paper, Garbsen, Germany.Search in Google Scholar
[9] Seeber, G., (2003). Satellite Geodesy, 2nd edn, Walter deGruyter, Berlin.10.1515/9783110200089Search in Google Scholar
[10] Spilker, J., (1996). Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Volume II, AIAA, Washington DC.10.2514/4.866388Search in Google Scholar
[11] Wübbena , G., Schmitz, M., Menge, F., Böder, V., Seeber, G., (2000). Automated Absolute Field Calibration of GPS Antennas in Real-Time. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS 2000), Salt Lake City, UT, September 19–22, pp. 2512–2522.Search in Google Scholar
[12] Wübbena, G., Schmitz, M., Boettcher, G., (2006). Near-Field Effects on GNSS Sites: Analysis using Absolute Robot Calibrations and Procedures to Determine Corrections. In: Proceedings of the IGS Workshop 2006 Perspectives and Visions for 2010 and beyond, Darmstadt, Germany, May 8–12.Search in Google Scholar
[13] Wübbena, G., Schmitz, M., Matzke, N., (2010). On GNSS In-Situ Calibration of Near-Field Multipath. In: International Symposium on GNSS space-based and ground-based Augmentation Systems and Applications 2010, Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar
[14] Zeimetz, P., Kuhlmann, H., (2008). On the Accuracy of Absolute GNSS Antenna Calibration and the Conception of a New Anechoic Chamber. In: Proceedings of the FIG Working Week 2008, Stockholm, Sweden, June, 14–19.Search in Google Scholar
© 2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston
