Abstract
The influence of Al incorporation on the heavy fermion superconductor UBe13 was investigated to explain the sample dependence of physical properties. Clear evidence for incorporated Al in flux-grown UBe13 single crystals is presented by results from X-ray diffraction, nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray spectroscopy. The increase of the lattice parameter and the concomitant change of the superconducting properties are caused by substitution of Be in the compound by 1–2 at.% Al. The minute amounts of Al in the structure were located by atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy. Specific heat measurements reveal the strong influence of incorporated Al on the physical properties of UBe13. Upon long-term annealing, Al incorporated in single crystals can leave the structure, restoring properties of Al-free polycrystalline UBe13.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Unconventional superconductivity usually appears near a suppressed magnetic phase, as is the case for many families of compounds - iron pnictides1, electron doped-cuprates2, organic superconductors3, and heavy fermion materials4. In these systems, the Cooper pairing mechanism is believed to be related to fluctuations of the magnetic order parameter5. UBe13 is a heavy fermion superconductor that stands out from this scheme, as no magnetic phase has yet been identified6 and hence the origin of the non-Fermi liquid behaviour and unconventional superconductivity remains a mystery. UBe13 crystallizes in the cubic NaZn13 structure type (space group \(Fm\bar{3}c\)) with the reported lattice parameter a = 10.254 Å (Fig. 1)7,8. Uranium at 8a site (1/4, 1/4, 1/4) is coordinated by 24 Be2 atoms at 96i site (0, 0.1763(1), 0.1150(1)). Be1 at 8b (0, 0, 0) is at the centre of an icosahedron formed by Be2 atoms9. The established route to large single crystals of UBe13 is the growth in aluminium flux, while polycrystalline UBe13 is accessible via arc melting of the elements10.
Extensive specific heat measurements have been performed for UBe13 on both single-10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 and polycrystalline samples20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33, for pure as well as doped material34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47. Single crystal experiments have revealed an extremely complex and often contradictory behaviour of UBe13 in both the normal and superconducting state, evidenced by different shapes of the Hc2(T) dependence, and small anomalies at different places in the H - T phase diagram12,13,21,48. Moreover, drastic variations in the lattice parameter a, the critical temperature Tc, the normal state electronic specific heat coefficient γ, and the size of the specific heat anomaly ΔCp/γTc have been observed for single and polycrystalline materials (Fig. S1)49,50,51. The lattice parameter a is reported to range from a = 10.254 Å to 10.2656 Å and the critical temperature from Tc = 0.35 K to 0.94 K8,49,52. Furthermore, a tends to be larger and Tc tends to be lower in single crystals, compared to polycrystalline samples. While this has been recognized previously, the possibility of Al incorporation from flux was excluded49. Spectroscopic measurements on single crystals also gave no indication of incorporated Al in UBe1350,53.
However, investigations of H - T phase diagrams as well as pressure studies found systematic differences in the physical properties between single crystals and polycrystalline samples14,16,54. Furthermore, a clear correlation between the lattice parameter a and the Al content x in polycrystalline UBe13−xAlx was established52,55. Recent specific heat measurements revealed a decrease of Tc upon Al addition in polycrystalline samples56. Nonetheless, no conclusive answer about the possibility and effect of Al incorporation in UBe13 has yet been provided50,51. To address these contradictory experimental observations, it was suggested that two variants of UBe13 exist: “H-type” (high Tc, 0.85 K < Tc < 0.95 K) and “L-type” (low Tc, Tc < 0.75 K). The “L-type” behaviour was found to occur only in single crystals, suggesting Be content variation or possible Al incorporation as the underlying cause, while the “H-type” behaviour was found for both single crystals and polycrystalline materials13.
The aim of this investigation is to clarify the following issues: (i) is Al incorporated into the crystal structure of UBe13, and if so, what is the solubility limit of Al in UBe13−xAlx; (ii) where is Al located within the crystal structure; (iii) what is the influence of Al substitution on the physical properties of UBe13 and what is the effect of annealing on incorporated Al. These questions are addressed in the current study by means of powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments (SXRD), wavelength dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDX), 27Al nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), as well as specific heat measurements.
Results
Solubility of Al in UBe13−xAlx
A substitution series of polycrystalline UBe13−xAlx (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.60) samples was prepared in order to investigate the possible solubility of Al in UBe13. On addition of Al, the lattice parameter a of UBe13−xAlx increases linearly from 10.2566(1) Å (x = 0) up to 10.2736(1) Å (x = 0.31), where the increase starts to saturate (Fig. 2). For x > 0.07 and x > 0.31, small amounts of UAl2 and UAl3 are present in the powder diffraction data, respectively. Annealing of the UBe13−xAlx samples significantly decreases the lattice parameter for all compositions (Fig. 2, measured lattice parameters listed in Table S1). The relative amounts of UAl2 and UAl3, observed in PXRD, increase upon annealing. The increase of the lattice parameter with Al content indicates the incorporation of Al into UBe13, forming the substitutional solid UBe13−xAlx. The change in the slope of the curve a vs. Al content, together with the appearance of UAl2 and UAl3 reveals the non-equilibrium state of the material. At temperatures around the melting point, Al is incorporated into UBe13−xAlx, leading to a lattice expansion. As the temperature is lowered, the solubility decreases and, during annealing Al atoms diffuse and leave the crystal. It has been argued that the incorporated Al may be distributed statistically on the Be1 and Be2 sites in the as-cast state of the samples and then orders on the Be1 sites upon annealing, instead of leaving the structure55. Results of specific heat and WDX measurements after annealing speak against an ordering of Al in the structure (see below). The lattice parameter of flux-grown single crystals of UBe13−xAlx is significantly larger compared to Al-free polycrystalline samples (Table S2), indicating Al incorporation from flux.
Magic angle spinning (MAS) 27Al nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy on powdered single crystals of UBe13−xAlx reveals two sharp, strongly overlapping signals (Fig. 3). The signal with a Knight shift δ = 1915 ppm (T = 300 K) cannot be attributed to any of the known phases in the U–Be–Al system (cf. Fig. S3), and originates from Al incorporated in UBe13−xAlx. It overlaps with a strong signal from Al metal flux residue (δ = 1635 ppm). A clear temperature dependence of the isotropic Knight shift was found for the signal with δ = 1915 ppm, consistent with paramagnetism in UBe13 (inset of Fig. 3). Pulse length optimization for this signal reveals that about 2 to 3 times shorter pulses are needed for maximum intensity compared to the signal of Al metal, due to the spread out of the satellite transitions. This indicates non-zero quadrupolar coupling, which is a sign of non-cubic site symmetry for Al in UBe13−xAlx, excluding substitution on the Be1 site at the icosahedron center57,58. This is in contrast to B-substituted UBe13−yBy, where the smaller B atoms were reported to substitute exclusively at the cubic Be1 site59. Wavelength dispersive X-ray spectra (WDX), recorded on surfaces of freshly cleaved UBe13−xAlx single crystals, show the Al-Kα line (E = 1.49 keV), confirming the incorporation of Al in the crystal structure (Figs 4 and S4). After long term annealing, the Al signal is below the limit of detection, corroborating that Al leaves the crystal. Scanning electron microscopy of the cross section of the annealed crystal (inset to Fig. 4) reveals that a thin layer formed on the surface of the crystal. Unfortunately, the small dimensions have prevented a detailed investigation of the composition up to now.
Locating Al in the crystal structure of UBe13−xAlx
Refinement of high-quality single crystal diffraction data for as-grown UBe13−xAlx agrees well with the published structure model9. However, careful investigation of the residual electron density reveals additional peaks. The observed maxima are located at the Be-icosahedron face, close to the Be2 position (Fig. 5a). This residual density was accounted for by Al replacing 1.8% of the Be2 in the icosahedron, improving the figure of merit RF from 1.17% to 1.01% (Table 1). Thereby, the Al and Be position slightly differ due to the size difference between Be and Al (rBe = 1.12 Å, rAl = 1.43 Å60). The occupation of the Al position in this crystal yields 1 to 2 Al atoms per unit cell, on average (Fig. 5b). This scenario explains the reported disorder on the Be2 site, which manifests itself in strongly increased thermal parameters, observed by neutron powder diffraction of flux-grown UBe13−xAlx single crystals9,61.
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) was performed on single crystals of UBe13−xAlx after crystal growth and after two annealing steps to localize the Al incorporations. HRTEM images of as-grown UBe13−xAlx show a rather homogeneous crystal lattice (Fig. 6a). Detailed inspection reveals strong contrast variations between the U atoms due to Al substitution on the Be lattice. The Al substitution can be clearly assigned to the Be2 site, as confirmed by TEM image simulations. Residual Al incorporations in a uniform crystal lattice are still detectable after 38 d of annealing (Fig. 6b). After 76 d of annealing, the Be substructure is dominated by strong contrast variations, which can be explained by accumulation of Be vacancies (Fig. 6c). The vacancies arise from the expulsion of Al and Be from the crystal. Furthermore, an apparent degradation on the nano-scale was observed for several of the investigated crystallites in this sample (Fig. S5), in line with the sample degradation effects observed in specific heat data (see below).
Superconductivity and annealing effects of UBe13−xAlx
The effects of annealing on the low-temperature specific heat of UBe13−xAlx were investigated on three single crystals of different size (0.62 mg, 1.64 mg, 5.94 mg; cf. Methods Section). In as-grown state, the small, medium and large crystal show Tc = 0.78 K, Tc = 0.66 K and Tc = 0.70 K, respectively (Fig. 7). Upon annealing, the onset of the superconducting transition shifts toward T = 0.9 K for all three crystals, accompanied by a strong broadening of the transition and a decrease of the jump ΔCp/γTc. For the small crystal, the width of the superconducting transition decreases again upon further annealing and Tc increases to the high value of 0.94 K, in line with reports that the annealing of UBe13−xAlx single crystals increases Tc55,56. For the medium and large crystals several stages are distinguishable after 19 d, 38 d and 57 d. The broadened signal appears to reflect at least two overlapping transitions with a range of transition temperatures.
Upon annealing, the entropy associated with the low Tc transitions is reduced and transferred to the high Tc transitions. Integration of the peak in Cp/T up to 1 K reveals a nearly constant area up to 38 d for the small and medium and up to 76 d for the large crystal. The small and medium-sized crystals reach a final state after 38 d and 57 d of annealing, respectively, characterized by a single transition with a sharp onset. The ratio ΔCp/γTc and also the Sommerfeld coefficient γ of the normal conducting state are reduced compared to the as-grown state (cf. Fig. S6). The large crystal shows a slower change than the small and medium crystals and has not reached a comparable final state even after 76 d of annealing. The crystal-size dependence of the annealing effect corroborates the diffusion-based origin of the observed behaviour. The increased Tc and reduced specific heat anomaly ΔCp/γTc, observed for the final state, are concomitant with a decrease of the lattice parameter (from a = 10.2629(1) Å to a = 10.2579(2) Å) and Al depletion as evidenced by WDX spectroscopy on the medium-sized crystal (Fig. 4).
Considering the incorporated Al as an electron donor in UBe13−xAlx, the enhanced electronic specific heat in the as-grown state could be a result of an increased charge carrier concentration, in line with theoretical and experimental band structure studies62,63,64. In this respect, the reduced size of ΔCp/γTc ≈ 2.0–2.3 in the final state is comparable to reports of Al-free polycrystalline UBe1334,46. The increased jump ΔCp/γTc, observed in several UBe13−xAlx single crystals, is reminiscent of substitution experiments with the isoelectronic element B in UBe13−yBy, where the addition of B led to drastic changes in the low temperature behaviour of the electronic specific heat36,37,46,55. The observed changes of the critical temperature Tc, size of Cp/Tmax, Sommerfeld coefficient γ and lattice parameter a cover the range of reported values for various samples of UBe13 (Fig. 8). Therefore, the reported variations in the superconducting properties can be ascribed to the respective sample history, i.e. different annealing treatments and Al contents.
Annealing of the medium sized crystal to a total of 76 d did not increase Tc any further, but led to a decrease of the jump in specific heat, a decrease of the transition peak area and an even flatter decay towards lower temperatures. We take this as indication that prolonged annealing can lead, besides depletion of Al, to a partial disintegration of the crystal structure, accompanied by the accumulation of vacancies in the Be substructure. This is in agreement with the observed variations of the lattice parameter in Al-free, off-stoichiometric, polycrystalline samples, ranging from a = 10.2564(2) Å (UBe11) to a = 10.2592(1) Å (UBe15).
Discussion
The dependence of the lattice parameter a on Al content for as-cast polycrystalline samples UBe13−xAlx confirms the incorporation of Al in UBe13. Wavelength dispersive X-ray spectroscopy on inner surfaces of cleaved UBe13−xAlx single crystals unequivocally shows the presence of aluminum in Al-flux grown crystals. The temperature dependence of the 27Al NMR signal (δ(300 K) = 1915 ppm) of a UBe13−xAlx single crystal corroborates the signal origin from Al in the UBe13 structure, while the pulse-length dependence of the 27Al signal indicates non-cubic site symmetry for Al in UBe13−xAlx. Additional electron density peaks at the Be icosahedron face close to the Be2 position were observed in single crystal X-ray diffraction, revealing that Al replaces Be2 in the structure (1–2 Al atoms per unit cell). Transmission electron microscopy images show indeed Al atoms substituting on the Be2 position. The decrease of the lattice parameter upon annealing of the polycrystalline samples UBe13−xAlx indicates a strong temperature dependence of the Al solubility. Al is incorporated and trapped during the solidification of UBe13−xAlx, but can diffuse and leave the structure upon long-term annealing, as reflected by the formation of binary U–Al compounds.
Annealing strongly influences the low temperature specific heat and superconducting transition of UBe13−xAlx single crystals. Long-term annealing leads to an increase of Tc above 0.9 K, where the transition seems to shift in several stages. The diffusion of Al to the surface of the crystal during annealing creates volumes with varying Al content which is reflected in a spread of transition temperatures Tc within one crystal. Annealing can therefore change the behaviour of an “L-type” crystal to “H-type”, equivalent to a decrease in Al content. Long-term annealing leads to a uniform Al depletion, as evidenced by a sharp transition in specific heat and WDX spectra of the annealed crystal. The low-temperature specific heat of annealed single crystals behaves similar to Al-free polycrystalline samples. The annealing time needed to reach the highest Tc is proportional to the crystal size, confirming that Al diffuses and leaves the crystal rather than ordering locally on a specific site. However, prolonged annealing may lead to a degradation of the structure due to the relatively high Be vapour pressure. This is evidenced by the decrease of superconducting phase fraction in specific heat and the formation of vacancies in the Be lattice observed in HRTEM.
Methods
The polycrystalline samples of UBe13−xAlx (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.60), as well as the binary compounds UAl2 and UAl3 (NMR reference material) were synthesized by arc melting of the elemental metals, using U (sheet, Good Fellow, >99.95 wt.%), Be (sheet, Heraeus, >99.9 wt.%), and Al (droplets, Chempur, 99.999 wt.%). A small excess of Be was added to compensate for the material loss due to evaporation (typically 1.5–1.7 wt.%). Complete sample preparation was performed in Ar-filled glove boxes (MBraun, p(H2O/O2) < 0.1 ppm), dedicated to the handling of U- and Be-containing samples65. The polycrystalline samples were annealed in alumina crucibles under Ar atmosphere.
Large, mm-sized, cube-shaped single crystals of UBe13−xAlx were grown using Al flux. Arc melted specimens of U with Be and Al (U:Be:Al atomic ratio of 1:18:35) were placed in a BeO crucible. The crucible was then sealed under Ar atmosphere in a tantalum tube and placed in a furnace (LORA, HTM Reetz). The samples were heated up and kept at 1500 °C for 72 h and then cooled at 3 °C h−1 to room temperature. The crystals were isolated by selective dissolution of the Al flux in an aqueous NaOH solution (2 mol L−1).
The effects of annealing were investigated on three single crystals of UBe13−xAlx. The smallest crystal (0.62 mg) was isolated from Al flux and the two larger pieces (1.64 mg and 5.94 mg) were cut from one large single crystal (Fig. S2). The crystals were repeatedly annealed at 900 °C for intervals of 10 d to 19 d and the low temperature specific heat was measured after each annealing step. The single crystals were annealed in BeO crucibles, with added polycrystalline powder of UBe13, covered with a Be lid and sealed in a tantalum tube to guarantee sufficient Be vapour pressure in order to avoid Be losses during the heat treatment.
X-ray powder diffraction was performed on a Huber G670 Image Plate Guinier Camera equipped with a Ge-monochromator (Cu-Kα1 radiation, λ = 1.54056 Å). Single crystal diffraction data were recorded on a Rigaku AFC7 diffractometer equipped with a Saturn724+ CCD detector (Mo-Kα) (Details in Table 1). Indexing of powder diffraction patterns, structure solution based on single crystal diffraction data and structure refinement were performed within the WINCSD program package66. Lattice parameters were determined from powder X-ray diffraction by a least-squares refinement of the peak positions using an internal standard (LaB6). The heat capacity Cp was measured by thermal-relaxation calorimetry on a Quantum Design PPMS, equipped with a 3He cooling system.
Magic angle spinning (MAS) 27Al nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments were performed on a Bruker Avance 500 spectrometer with a magnetic field of B0 = 11.74 T and a standard Bruker MAS probe for 2.5 mm ZrO2 rotors at a spinning frequency of 25 kHz. The samples were powdered and diluted with dry KCl in order to increase the accessible surface area and therefore the signal intensity, which is limited by the penetration depth of the oscillating magnetic field in metallic samples. The reference frequency for 27Al was 130.31572 MHz, corresponding to the signal of an Al(NO3)3 solution in D2O. The spectra were obtained from the echoes after two pulses (\({90}_{x}^{^\circ }\) − τ − (90° or 180°)y − τ − acquisition) and recovery times between 50 ms and 500 ms. The presented spectr°um in Fig. 3 is a sum of three spectra where the observation window was centered at the isotropic position of the signal and shifted for ±150 kHz in frequency. In this way, the rotational sidebands spreading from about −1000 ppm to about +3000 ppm could be observed. The isotropic line at δ = 1915 ppm was determined by varying the MAS spinning rate. The sample temperature was obtained from the measured temperature in the MAS probe and the estimated temperature increase due to the frictional heating of the spinning rotor. The temperature-independent Knight shift δ0, due to the conduction electrons, was evaluated by linear extrapolation of the isotropic shift δ vs. magnetic susceptibility to χ = 0.
Scanning electron microscopy was performed on a JEOL JSM-6610 scanning electron microscope (15 kV acceleration voltage) equipped with a secondary electron detector, an electron backscatter detector, a ThermoScientific UltraDry EDX detector and a ThermoScientific MagnaRay WDX spectrometer. Wavelength dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (WDX) was performed on several crystals from different synthesis batches as an independent method to prove the presence of Al in the crystals and to separate the Al line from the U-escape peak of the EDX-Si detector.
High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) analyses were performed on the JEM-ARM300F (Grand ARM, JEOL) with double correction. The spherical aberration of the condenser and the objective lens are corrected by dodecapole correctors in the beam and the image forming system. TEM resolution is 0.5–0.7 Å depending on resolution criterion applied. TEM images were recorded on a 4 k × 4 k pixel CCD array (Gatan US4000). Additional analysis was carried out on a FEI Tecnai F30-G2 with Super-Twin lens (FEI) with a field emission gun at an acceleration voltage of 300 kV. The point resolution amounted to 2.0 Å, and the information limit to about 1.2 Å. The microscope was equipped with a wide angle slow scan CCD camera (MultiScan, 2 k × 2 k pixels; Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA). The datasets generated or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Paglione, J. & Greene, R. L. High-temperature superconductivity in iron-based materials. Nat. Phys. 6, 645–658, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1759 (2010).
Jin, K., Butch, N., Kirshenbaum, K., Paglione, J. & Greene, R. Link between spin fluctuations and electron pairing in copper oxide superconductors. Nat. 476, 73–75, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10308 (2011).
Doiron-Leyraud, N. et al. Correlation between linear resistivity and T c in the bechgaard salts and the pnictide superconductor Ba(Fe1−xCox)As2. Phys. Rev. B 80, 214531, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.214531 (2009).
Knebel, G., Aoki, D. & Flouquet, J. Antiferromagnetism and superconductivity in cerium based heavy-fermion compounds. C. R. Phys. 5–6, 542–566, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2011.05.002 (2011).
Monthoux, P., Pines, D. & Lonzarich, G. G. Superconductivity without phonons. Nat. 450, 1177–1183, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06480 (2007).
De Visser, A. & Franse, J. J. M. Uranium-based heavy-fermion superconductors:an experimental survey. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 100, 204–217, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(91)90821-Q (1991).
Baenziger, N. C. & Rundle, R. E. The MBe13 compounds. Acta Crystallogr. 2, 258, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0365110X49000655 (1949).
Alekseevskii, N. E., Nizhankovskii, V. I., Narozhnyi, V. N., Khlybov, E. P. & Mitin, A. V. Investigation of UBe13 and other beryllium and uranium compounds in normal and superconducting states. J. Low Temp. Phys. 64, 87–104, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00681544 (1986).
Goldman, A. I., Shapiro, S. M. & Cox, D. E. Neutron-diffraction studies of UBe13 and ThBe13. Phys. Rev. B 32, 6042–6044, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.6042 (1985).
Ott, H. R., Rudigier, H., Fisk, Z. & Smith, J. L. UBe13: An unconventional actinide superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1595–1598, https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.50.1595 (1983).
Gegenwart, P. et al. Non-fermi liquid normal state of the heavy-fermion superconductor UBe13. Phys. C: Supercond. 408–410, 157–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physc.2004.02.070 (2004).
Kromer, F. et al. Revision of the phase diagram of superconducting U1−xThxBe13. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4476–4479, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4476 (1998).
Langhammer, C. et al. Evidence for the existence of two variants of UBe13. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 177–181, 443–444, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(97)00690-2 (1998).
Miclea, C. et al. Unconventional superconductivity in UBe13 probed by uniaxial stress. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 312–313, 97–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(01)01071-7 (2002).
Ramirez, A. P., Varma, C. M., Fisk, Z. & Smith, J. L. Fermi-liquid renormalization in the superconducting state of UBe13. Philos. Mag. B 79, 111–117, https://doi.org/10.1080/13642819908206785 (1999).
Reinders, P. H. P. et al. Specific-heat measurements on UBe13 under uniaxial pressure. Europhys. Lett. 24, 619–624, https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/25/8/010 (1994).
Shimizu, Y. et al. Maki parameter and upper critical field of the heavy-fermion superconductor UBe13. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 80, 093701, https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.80.093701 (2011).
Shimizu, Y. et al. Heat capacity measurements on UBe13 in rotated magnetic fields: Anisotropic response in the normal state and absence of nodal quasiparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 400, 52–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.08.003 (2016).
Stewart, G. R., Fisk, Z., Smith, J. L., Willis, J. O. & Wire, M. S. New heavy-fermion system, NpBe13, with a comparison to UBe13 and PuBe13. Phys. Rev. B 30, 1249–1252, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.30.1249 (1984).
Brison, J. P. et al. Normal and superconducting properties of UBe13. J. Phys. France 50, 2795–2810, https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0198900500180279500 (1989).
Ellman, B., Rosenbaum, T. F., Kim, J. S. & Stewart, G. R. Thermodynamic features in the H-T plane of superconducting UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 44, 12074–12076, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.12074 (1991).
Fisk, Z., Ott, H. & Smith, J. Heavy-fermion uranium systems. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 47–48, 12–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(85)90345-2 (1985).
Graf, M. J., Fortune, N. A., Brooks, J. S., Smith, J. L. & Fisk, Z. Specific heat of pure and thoriated UBe13 at low temperatures in high magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 40, 9358–9361, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.9358 (1989).
Mayer, H. M. et al. Normal-state and superconducting properties of the heavy-fermion compound UBe13 in magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. B 33, 3168–3171, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.33.3168 (1986).
Ott, H. R. et al. p-wave superconductivity in UBe13. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1915–1918, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.1915 (1984).
Radovan, H. A., Zieve, R. J., Kim, J. S. & Stewart, G. R. Implications of T c-variation in UBe13 for a possible Fulde–Ferrell–Larkin–Ovchinnikov phase. J. Supercond. 16, 957–960, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026231121310 (2003).
Rauchschwalbe, U., Ahlheim, U., Bredl, C. & Mayer, H. S. F. Critical magnetic fields and specific heats of heavy fermion superconductors. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 63–64, 447–454, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-4832-2948-5.50132-5 (1987).
Rauchschwalbe, U., Bredi, C. D., Steglich, F., Maki, K. & Fulde, P. Phase diagram of the superconducting states of U1−xThxBe13. Europhys. Lett. 3, 757, https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/3/6/017 (1987).
Ravex, A., Flouquet, J., Tholence, J., Jaccard, D. & Meyer, A. Thermal conductivity and specific heat measurements on UBe13. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 63–64, 400–402, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(87)90621-4 (1987).
Renker, B. et al. Low-frequency einstein mode in the heavy-fermion compound UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 32, 1859–1861, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.1859 (1985).
Schuberth, E. A., Kloss, K., Schupp, J. & Andres, K. Specific heat and magnetic susceptibility of UPt3 and UBe13 at mK-temperatures. Z. Phys. B Con. Mat. 97, 55–58, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01317587 (1995).
Shimizu, Y., Pourret, A., Knebel, G., Palacio-Morales, A. & Aoki, D. Non-fermi-liquid nature and exotic thermoelectric power in the heavy-fermion superconductor UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 92, 241101, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.241101 (2015).
Tou, H., Ishida, K. & Kitaoka, Y. Quasiparticle spin susceptibility in heavy-fermion superconductors: An NMR study compared with specific heat results. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 1245–1254, https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.74.1245 (2005).
Beyermann, W. P. et al. Effects of boron substitution on the superconducting state of UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 51, 404–409, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.404 (1995).
Dalichaouch, Y. et al. Upper critical magnetic field of the heavy-electron superconductors U1−xThxBe13 (x = 0 and 2.9%) doped with paramagnetic Gd and other rare-earth ions. Phys. Rev. B 43, 299–308, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.299 (1991).
Heffner, R. H., Ott, H. R., Schenck, A., Mydosh, J. A. & MacLaughlin, D. E. Connections between magnetism and superconductivity in UBe13 doped with thorium or boron (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 70, 5782–5787, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.350160 (1991).
Heffner, R. H. et al. Thermodynamics and magnetism in U1−xThxBe13−yBy. J. Appl. Phys. 69, 5481–5483, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.347972 (1991).
Kim, J. S., Andraka, B., Jee, C. S., Roy, S. B. & Stewart, G. R. Single-ion effects in the formation of the heavy-fermion ground state in UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 41, 11073–11081, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.11073 (1990).
Kim, J. S. & Stewart, G. R. Observation of low-lying levels in UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 51, 16190–16193, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.16190 (1995).
Kromer, F. et al. Thermal expansion studies of superconducting U1−xThxBe13 (0 < x < 0.052): Implications for the interpretation of the T-x phase diagram. Phys. Rev. B 62, 12477–12488, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.62.12477 (2000).
Lang, M. et al. New results on the low-T phase diagram of u1−xthxbe13: A thermodynamic study. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 259, 608–613, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4526(98)00695-4 (1999).
Mayer, H. M., Rauchschwalbe, U., Steglich, F., Stewart, G. R. & Giorgi, A. L. Low temperature and high magnetic field study of UBe13, U0.97Th0.03Be13 and UBe12.94Cu0.06. Z. Phys. B Con. Mat. 64, 299–304, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303600 (1986).
Oeschler, N. et al. UBe13: Prototype of a non-fermi-liquid superconductor. Acta Phys. Polonica B 34, 255–274, http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/fulltext?series=Reg&vol=34&page=255 (2003).
Ott, H. R., Rudigier, H., Fisk, Z. & Smith, J. L. Phase transition in the superconducting state of U1−xThxBe13 (x = 0–0.06). Phys. Rev. B 31, 1651–1653, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.31.1651 (1985).
Ott, H. R., Rudigier, H., Felder, E., Fisk, Z. & Smith, J. L. Influence of impurities and magnetic fields on the normal and superconducting states of UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 33, 126–131, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.33.126 (1986).
Ott, H. R., Felder, E., Fisk, Z., Heffner, R. H. & Smith, J. L. Influence of boron impurities on the superconducting phase transition of U1−xThxBe13. Phys. Rev. B 44, 7081–7084, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.7081 (1991).
Zieve, R. J., Rosenbaum, T. F., Kim, J. S., Stewart, G. R. & Sigrist, M. Anomalous flux pinning in a torus of thoriated UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 51, 12041–12044, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.12041 (1995).
Shimizu, Y., Haga, Y., Ikeda, Y., Yanagisawa, T. & Amitsuka, H. Observation of an unusual magnetic anomaly in the superconducting mixed state of heavy-fermion compound UBe13 by precise dc magnetization measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 217001, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.217001 (2012).
Smith, J. et al. Impurity effects in UBe13. Phys. B + C 135, 3–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4363(85)90420-6 (1985).
Smith, J. L. Sample-dependent properties of the superconductors UBe13 and UPt3. Philos. Mag. B 65, 1367–1371, https://doi.org/10.1080/13642819208215103 (1992).
Steglich, F. et al. CeCu2Si2 and UBe13: New questions - old answers? J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59, 2190–2195, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3697(98)00212-1 (1998).
Kim, J. S. Doping experiments in heavy fermion superconductors. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, http://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00003274/00001 (1992).
Wolf, B. et al. Magnetoacoustic quantum oscillations in the heavy fermion superconductor UBe13. Z. Phys. B Con. Mat. 85, 159–160, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313215 (1991).
Ott, H. Chapter 5: Characteristic features of heavy-electron materials. In Brewer, D. (ed.) Progress in Low Temperature Physics, vol. 11 of Progress in Low Temperature Physics, 215–289, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6417(08)60034-7 (Elsevier, 1987).
Thomas, S. G. An investigation of some unusual single crystals of the heavy fermion superconductor UBe 13. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, http://uf.catalog.fcla.edu/uf.jsp?st=UF030040436&ix=pm&I=0&V=D&pm=1&fl=ba (1998).
Wu, B. Unconventional Superconductivity in the Ferromagnetic Superconductor UCoGe. Ph.D. thesis, Université de Grenoble, https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01628467 (2016).
Kentgens, A. A practical guide to solid-state NMR of half-integer quadrupolar nuclei with some applications to disordered systems. Geoderma 80, 271–306, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00056-6 (1997).
Man, P. P. Quadrupole couplings in nuclear magnetic resonance, general. In Meyers, R. A. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470027318 (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 2000).
Ahrens, E. T. et al. Nmr determination of the B substitutional site in UBe13−xBx. Phys. Rev. B 48, 6691–6694, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.6691 (1993).
Pauling, L. Atomic radii and interatomic distances in metals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 69, 542–553, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01195a024 (1947).
Shapiro, S. et al. A neutron scattering study of the heavy fermion system UBe13. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 52, 418–420, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(85)90320-8 (1985).
Yaresko, A. N., Antonov, V. N. & Harmon, B. N. Electronic structure and x-ray magnetic circular dichroism in uranium compounds. III. Heavy-fermion compounds. Phys. Rev. B 68, 214426, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.68.214426 (2003).
Wuilloud, E., Baer, Y., Ott, H. R., Fisk, Z. & Smith, J. L. High-energy spectroscopic study of the electronic structure of UBe13. Phys. Rev. B 29, 5228–5231, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.29.5228 (1984).
Takegahara, K., Harima, H. & Kasuya, T. Electronic structure of UBe13. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 47–48, 263–265, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(85)90410-X (1985).
Leithe-Jasper, A., Borrmann, H. & Hönle, W. Scientific Report of the Max-Planck-Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids. Dresden, http://www.cpfs.mpg.de/2120871/C_2006-2008.pdf, 25 (2006).
Akselrud, L. & Grin, Y. WinCSD-software package for crystallographic calculations. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 47, 803–805, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576714001058 (2014).
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to Jean-Pascal Brison (CEA, Grenoble, France), Christoph Geibel (MPI CPfS, Dresden, Germany) and Wilder Carrillo (MPI CPfS, Dresden) for fruitful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.L.-J., E.H. and Y.G. developed the concept of this study. A.A. wrote the manuscript, performed synthesis, crystallographic and metallographic characterization as well as single crystal growth together with A.L.-J. P.S. and I.Z. made TEM investigations. H.B. performed single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments. Y.G. performed crystal structure refinements. M.B. performed NMR measurements. U.B. performed WDX measurements. M.N., E.S., F.A. and W.S. performed physical property measurements and data evaluation. All authors have reviewed the manuscript and given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Amon, A., Zelenina, I., Simon, P. et al. Tracking aluminium impurities in single crystals of the heavy-fermion superconductor UBe13. Sci Rep 8, 10654 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28991-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28991-w
This article is cited by
-
Single thermodynamic transition at 2 K in superconducting UTe2 single crystals
Communications Materials (2022)
-
Non-centrosymmetric superconductor Th\(_4\)Be\(_{{33}}\)Pt\(_{{16}}\) and heavy-fermion U\(_4\)Be\(_{{33}}\)Pt\(_{{16}}\) cage compounds
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
UBe13 and U1−xThxBe13: Unconventional Superconductors
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.