Abstract
We investigate the influence of gas pore pressure in granular flows through numerical simulations on horizontal and low-angle inclined surfaces. We present a two-phase formulation that allows a description of dam-break experiments considering high-aspect-ratio collapsing columns and depth-dependent variations of flow properties. The model is confirmed by comparing its results with data from analogue experiments. The results suggest that a constant, effective pore pressure diffusion coefficient can be determined in order to reproduce reasonably well the dynamics of the studied dam-break experiments, with values of the diffusion coefficient consistent with experimental estimates from defluidizing static columns. The discrepancies between simulations performed using different effective pore pressure diffusion coefficients are mainly observed during the early acceleration stage, while the final deceleration rate, once pore pressure has been dissipated, is similar in all the studied numerical experiments. However, these short-lasting discrepancies in the acceleration stage can be manifested in large differences in the resulting run-out distance. We also analyze the pore pressure at different distances along the channel. Although our model is not able to simulate the under-pressure phase generated by the sliding head of the flows in experiments and measured beneath the flow-substrate interface, the spatio-temporal characteristics of the subsequent over-pressure phase are compatible with experimental data. Additionally, we studied the deposition dynamics of the granular material, showing that the timescale of deposition is much smaller than that of the granular flow, while the time of the deposition onset varies as a function of the distance from the reservoir, being strongly controlled by the surface slope angle. The simulations reveal that an increment of the surface slope angle from 0° to 10° is able to increase significantly the flow run-out distance (by a factor between 2.05 and 2.25, depending on the fluidization conditions). This has major implications for pyroclastic density currents, which typically propagate at such gentle slope angles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balay S, Abhyankar S, Adams M, Brown J, Brune P, Buschelman K, Dalcin L, Dener A, Eijkhout V, Gropp W, Karpeyev D, Kaushik D, Knepley M, May D, McInnes LC, Mills R, Munson T, Rupp K, Sanan P, Smith B, Zampini S, Zhang H (2018) PETSc Users Manual Revision 3.10 (Technical Report ANL-95/11 - Revision 3.10). Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States).
Balay S, Abhyankar S, Adams MF, Benson S, Brown J, Brune P, Buschelman K, Constantinescu EM, Dalcin L, Dener A, Eijkhout V, Gropp WD, Hapla V, Isaac T, Jolivet P, Karpeev D, Kaushik D, Knepley MG, Kong F, Kruger S, May DA, McInnes LC, Mills RT, Mitchell L, Munson T, Roman JE, Rupp K, Sanan P, Sarich J, Smith BF, Zampini S, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang H, Zhang J (2021) PETSc Web page. https://petsc.org/
Benage M, Dufek J, Mothes P (2016) Quantifying entrainment in pyroclastic density currents from the Tungurahua eruption, Ecuador: integrating field proxies with numerical simulations. Geophys Res Lett 43(13):6932–6941. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069527
Bernard J, Kelfoun K, Le Pennec J, Vallejo Vargas S (2014) Pyroclastic flow erosion and bulking processes: comparing field-based vs modeling results at Tungurahua volcano. Ecuador. Bulletin of Volcanology 76(9):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-014-0858-y
Bouchut F, Fernández-Nieto E, Mangeney A, Narbona-Reina G (2016) A two-phase two-layer model for fluidized granular flows with dilatancy effects. J Fluid Mech 801:166–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.417
Bouchut F, Fernández-Nieto E, Mangeney A, Narbona-Reina G (2021) Dilatancy in dry granular flows with a compressible μ(I) rheology. J Comput Phys 429:110013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.110013
Brand B, Mackaman-Lofland C, Pollock N, Bendaña S, Dawson B, Wichgers P (2014) Dynamics of pyroclastic density currents: conditions that promote substrate erosion and self-channelization—Mount St Helens, Washington (USA). J Volcanol Geoth Res 276:189–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2014.01.007
Branney M, Kokelaar P (2002) Pyroclastic density currents and the sedimentation of ignimbrites. Geological Society of London.
Breard EC, Lube G, Jones JR, Dufek J, Cronin SJ, Valentine GA, Moebis A (2016) Coupling of turbulent and non-turbulent flow regimes within pyroclastic density currents. Nat Geosci 9(10):767–771. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2794
Breard E, Dufek J, Lube G (2018) Enhanced mobility in concentrated pyroclastic density currents: an examination of a self-fluidization mechanism. Geophys Res Lett 45(2):654–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075759
Breard EC, Dufek J, Roche O (2019a) Continuum modeling of pressure-balanced and fluidized granular flows in 2-D: comparison with glass bead experiments and implications for concentrated pyroclastic density currents. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 124(6):5557–5583. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016874
Breard EC, Jones JR, Fullard L, Lube G, Davies C, Dufek J (2019b) The permeability of volcanic mixtures—implications for pyroclastic currents. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 124(2):1343–1360. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016544
Burgisser A (2012) A semi-empirical method to calculate the permeability of homogeneously fluidized pyroclastic material. J Volcanol Geoth Res 243:97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2012.08.015
Burgisser A, Bergantz G (2002) Reconciling pyroclastic flow and surge: the multiphase physics of pyroclastic density currents. Earth Planet Sci Lett 202(2):405–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00789-6
Bursik MI, Woods AW (1996) The dynamics and thermodynamics of large ash-flows. Bull Volcanol 58:175–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004450050134
Cas R, Wright H, Folkes C, Lesti C, Porreca M, Giordano G, Viramonte J (2011) The flow dynamics of an extremely large volume pyroclastic flow, the 2.08-Ma Cerro Galán Ignimbrite, NW Argentina, and comparison with other flow types. Bull Volcanol 73(10):1583–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0564-y
Chalayer R, Chupin L, Dubois T (2018) A bi-projection method for incompressible Bingham flows with variable density, viscosity, and yield stress. SIAM J Numer Anal 56(4):2461–2483. https://doi.org/10.1137/17M113993X
Chédeville C, Roche O (2015) Influence of slope angle on pore pressure generation and kinematics of pyroclastic flows: insights from laboratory experiments. Bull Volcanol 77(11):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-015-0981-4
Chédeville C, Roche O (2018) Autofluidization of collapsing bed of fine particles: implications for the emplacement of pyroclastic flows. J Volcanol Geoth Res 368:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.11.007
Chupin L, Dubois T (2016) A bi-projection method for Bingham type flows. Comput Math Appl 72(5):1263–1286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2016.06.026
Chupin L, Dubois T, Phan M, Roche O (2021) Pressure-dependent threshold in a granular flow: numerical modeling and experimental validation. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 291:104529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2021.104529
Cole P, Neri A, Baxter P (2015) Hazards from pyroclastic density currents. In: The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes (pp. 943-956). Academic Press.
Druitt T (1998) Pyroclastic density currents. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 145(1):145–182
Druitt T, Avard G, Bruni G, Lettieri P, Maez F (2007) Gas retention in fine-grained pyroclastic flow materials at high temperatures. Bull Volcanol 69(8):881–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-007-0116-7
Dufek J (2016) The fluid mechanics of pyroclastic density currents. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 48:459–485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034252
Dufek J, Esposti Ongaro T, Roche O (2015) Pyroclastic density currents: processes and models. In: The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes (pp. 617-629). Academic Press
Esposti Ongaro T, Cerminara M, Charbonnier S, Lube G, Valentine G (2020) A framework for validation and benchmarking of pyroclastic current models. Bull Volcanol 82:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-020-01388-2
Farin M, Mangeney A, Roche O (2014) Fundamental changes of granular flow dynamics, deposition, and erosion processes at high slope angles: insights from laboratory experiments. J Geophys Res Earth Surf 119(3):504–532. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JF002750
Francis P, O’Callaghan L, Kretzschmar G, Thorpe R, Sparks R, Page R, De Barrio R, Gillou G, Gonzalez O (1983) The Cerro Galan ignimbrite. Nature 301(5895):51–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/301051a0
Fries A, Roche O, Carazzo G (2021) Granular mixture deflation and generation of pore fluid pressure at the impact zone of a pyroclastic fountain: experimental insights. J Volcanol Geoth Res 414:107226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2021.107226
Fullmer WD, Hrenya CM (2017) The clustering instability in rapid granular and gas-solid flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 49:485–510. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-010816-060028
Garres-Díaz J, Bouchut F, Fernández-Nieto E, Mangeney A, Narbona-Reina G (2020) Multilayer models for shallow two-phase debris flows with dilatancy effects. J Comput Phys 419:109699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109699
Gase A, Brand B, Bradford J (2017) Evidence of erosional self-channelization of pyroclastic density currents revealed by ground-penetrating radar imaging at Mount St. Helens, Washington (USA). Geophys Res Lett 44(5):2220–2228. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072178
Giordano G, Cas RAF (2021) Classification of ignimbrites and their eruptions. Earth Sci Rev 220:103697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103697
Goren L, Aharonov E, Sparks D, Toussaint R (2010) Pore pressure evolution in deforming granular material: a general formulation and the infinitely stiff approximation. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 115(B9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB007191
Gray J, Edwards A (2014) A depth-averaged µ(I)-rheology for shallow granular free-surface flows. J Fluid Mech 755:503–534. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2014.450
Gueugneau V, Kelfoun K, Roche O, Chupin L (2017) Effects of pore pressure in pyroclastic flows: numerical simulation and experimental validation. Geophys Res Lett 44(5):2194–2202. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072591
Ionescu I, Mangeney A, Bouchut F, Roche O (2015) Viscoplastic modeling of granular column collapse with pressure-dependent rheology. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech 219:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2015.02.006
Iverson R (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35(3):245–296. https://doi.org/10.1029/97RG00426
Iverson R, Denlinger R (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain: 1. Coulomb mixture theory. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 106(B1):537–552. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900329
Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O (2006) A constitutive law for dense granular flows. Nature 441(7094):727–730. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04801
Kelfoun K (2011) Suitability of simple rheological laws for the numerical simulation of dense pyroclastic flows and long‐runout volcanic avalanches. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 116(B8). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB007622
Lesti C, Porreca M, Giordano G, Mattei M, Cas R, Wright H, Folkes C, Viramonte J (2011) High-temperature emplacement of the Cerro Galán and Toconquis Group ignimbrites (Puna plateau, NW Argentina) determined by TRM analyses. Bull Volcanol 73(10):1535–1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0536-2
Lube G, Breard EC, Jones J, Fullard L, Dufek J, Cronin SJ, Wang T (2019) Generation of air lubrication within pyroclastic density currents. Nat Geosci 12(5):381–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0338-2
Lube G, Breard EC, Esposti Ongaro T, Dufek J, Brand B (2020) Multiphase flow behaviour and hazard prediction of pyroclastic density currents. Nat Rev Earth Environ 1(7):348–365. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0064-8
Marino B, Thomas L, Linden P (2005) The front condition for gravity currents. J Fluid Mech 536:49–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112005004933
Montserrat S, Tamburrino A, Roche O, Niño Y (2012) Pore fluid pressure diffusion in defluidizing granular columns. J Geophys Res: Earth Surface 117(F2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002164
Neri A, Esposti Ongaro T, Voight B, Widiwijayanti C (2015) Pyroclastic density current hazards and risk. In: Volcanic Hazards, Risks and Disasters (pp. 109-140). Elsevier
Osher S, Fedkiw R (2001) Level set methods: an overview and some recent results. J Comput Phys 169(2):463–502. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6636
Roche O (2012) Depositional processes and gas pore pressure in pyroclastic flows: an experimental perspective. Bull Volcanol 74(8):1807–1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-012-0639-4
Roche O, Montserrat S, Niño Y, Tamburrino A (2010) Pore fluid pressure and internal kinematics of gravitational laboratory air‐particle flows: insights into the emplacement dynamics of pyroclastic flows. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 115(B9). https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB007133
Roche O, Buesch D, Valentine G (2016) Slow-moving and far-travelled dense pyroclastic flows during the Peach Spring super-eruption. Nat Commun 7(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10890
Roche O, Azzaoui N, Guillin A (2021) Discharge rate of explosive volcanic eruption controls runout distance of pyroclastic density currents. Earth Planet Sci Lett 568:117017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117017
Rowley P, Roche O, Druitt T, Cas R (2014) Experimental study of dense pyroclastic density currents using sustained, gas-fluidized granular flows. Bull Volcanol 76(9):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-014-0855-1
Savage S, Iverson R (2003) Surge dynamics coupled to pore-pressure evolution in debris flows. In : Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment. Edited by: Rickenmann D, Chen CL. Millpress, Rotterdam (pp. 503-514)
Shimizu H, Koyaguchi T, Suzuki Y (2019) The run-out distance of large-scale pyroclastic density currents: a two-layer depth-averaged model. J Volcanol Geoth Res 381:168–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.03.013
Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Month Weather Rev 91(3):99–164
Sweeney M, Valentine G (2017) Impact zone dynamics of dilute mono- and polydisperse jets and their implications for the initial conditions of pyroclastic density currents. Phys Fluids 29(9):093304. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5004197
Valentine G (2019) Preface to the topical collection—pyroclastic current models: benchmarking and validation. Bull Volcanol 81:69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-019-1328-3
Valentine G (2020) Initiation of dilute and concentrated pyroclastic currents from collapsing mixtures and origin of their proximal deposits. Bull Volcanol 82(2):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-020-1366-x
Valentine G, Buesch D, Fisher R (1989) Basal layered deposits of the Peach Springs Tuff, northwestern Arizona, USA. Bull Volcanol 51(6):395–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01078808
Valentine G, Doronzo D, Dellino P, de Tullio M (2011) Effects of volcano profile on dilute pyroclastic density currents: numerical simulations. Geology 39(10):947–950. https://doi.org/10.1130/G31936.1
Valentine G, Sweeney M (2018) Compressible flow phenomena at inception of lateral density currents fed by collapsing gas-particle mixtures. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 123(2):1286–1302. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB015129
Wilson C (1984) The role of fluidization in the emplacement of pyroclastic flows, 2: experimental results and their interpretation. J Volcanol Geoth Res 20(1–2):55–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-0273(84)90066-0
Acknowledgements
We thank an anonymous referee, Dr. Gert Lube and Dr. Greg Valentine for their useful comments and suggestions to improve this work.
Funding
This research was financed by the French government IDEX-ISITE initiative 16-IDEX-0001 (CAP 20-25). This is Laboratory of Excellence ClerVolc contribution number 501. The numerical simulations have been performed on a DELL cluster with 32 processors Xeon E2650v2 (8 cores), 1 To of total memory, and an infiniband (FDR 56Gb/s) connecting network. This cluster has been financed by the French Government Laboratory of Excellence initiative n°ANR-10-LABX-0006.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: G.A. Valentine; Deputy Executive Editor: J. Tadeucci
This paper constitutes part of a topical collection: Pyroclastic current models: benchmarking and validation.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aravena, A., Chupin, L., Dubois, T. et al. The influence of gas pore pressure in dense granular flows: numerical simulations versus experiments and implications for pyroclastic density currents. Bull Volcanol 83, 77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-021-01507-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-021-01507-7