Abstract
Previous studies suggested that the power of unit root and stationarity tests can be improved by augmenting a testing regression model with stationary covariates. However, one practical problem arises since such procedures require finding the variables that satisfy certain conditions. The difficulty of finding satisfactory covariate has hindered using such desired tests. In this paper, we suggest using non-normal errors to construct stationary covariates in testing for stationarity. We do not need to look for outside variables, but we utilize the distributional information embodied in a time series of interest. The terms driven from the information on non-normal errors can be employed as valid stationary covariates. For this, we adopt the framework of stationarity tests of Jansson (Jansson, M. 2004. “Stationarity Testing with Covariates.” Econometric Theory 20: 56–94). We show that the tests can achieve much-improved power. We then present the response surface function estimates to facilitate computing the critical values and the corresponding p-values. We investigate the nature of shocks to the US macro-economic series using the updated Nelson–Plosser data set through our new testing procedure. We find stronger evidence of non-stationarity than their univariate counterparts that do not use the covariates.
-
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
Bai, J., and J. L. Carrion-I-Silvestre. 2009. “Structural Changes, Common Stochastic Trends, and Unit Roots in Panel Data.” The Review of Economic Studies 76 (2): 471–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00530.x.Search in Google Scholar
Carrion-i-Silvestre, J. L., A. S. Rosselló, and M. A. Ortuño. 1999. “Response Surface Estimates for the Dickey–Fuller Unit Root Test with Structural Breaks.” Economics Letters 63 (3): 279–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(99)00044-0.Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Y., R. Sickles, and W. Wong. 2017. “Bootstrapping Unit Root Tests with Covariates.” Econometric Reviews 36: 136–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2015.1114279.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Y. W., and K. S. Lai. 1995a. “Lag Order and Critical Values of the Augmented Dickey–Fuller Test.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 13 (3): 277–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1995.10524601.Search in Google Scholar
Cheung, Y. W., and K. S. Lai. 1995b. “Lag Order and Critical Values of a Modified Dickey–Fuller Test.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 57 (3): 411–19.10.1111/j.1468-0084.1995.mp57003008.xSearch in Google Scholar
Dickey, D. A., and W. A. Fuller. 1979. “Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (366a): 427–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531.Search in Google Scholar
Elliott, G., and M. Jansson. 2003. “Testing for Unit Roots with Stationary Covariates.” Journal of Econometrics 115: 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00093-9.Search in Google Scholar
Elliott, G., T. J. Rothenberg, and J. Stock. 1996. “Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root.” Econometrica 64 (4): 813–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2171846.Search in Google Scholar
Fossati, S. 2012. “Covariate Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 56: 3070–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2011.05.019.Search in Google Scholar
Hansen, B. 1995. “Rethinking the Univariate Approach to Unit Root Testing: Using Covariates to Increase Power.” Econometric Theory 11: 1148–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600009993.Search in Google Scholar
Im, K. S., and P. Schmidt. 2008. “More Efficient Estimation under Non-Normality when Higher Moments Do Not Depend on the Regressors, Using Residual Augmented Least Squares.” Journal of Econometrics 144 (1): 219–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.01.003.Search in Google Scholar
Im, K. S., J. Lee, and M. A. Tieslau. 2014. “More Powerful Unit Root Tests with Non-normal Errors.” In Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, 315–42. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_10Search in Google Scholar
Jansson, M. 2004. “Stationarity Testing with Covariates.” Econometric Theory 20: 56–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266466604201037.Search in Google Scholar
Jarque, C. M., and A. K. Bera. 1987. “A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals.” International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique 55 (2): 163–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403192.Search in Google Scholar
Juhl, T. 2004. “A Lagrange Multiplier Stationarity Test Using Covariates.” Economics Letters 85: 321–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.04.021.Search in Google Scholar
Kwiatkowski, D., P. C. B. Phillips, P. Schmidt, and Y. Shin. 1992. “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity against the Alternative of a Unit Root: How Sure are We that Economic Time Series Have a Unit Root?.” Journal of Econometrics 54: 159–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90104-y.Search in Google Scholar
Lee, J., and M. C. Strazicich. 2003. “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (4): 1082–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1255(199611)11:6<601::aid-jae417>3.0.co;2-t.10.1162/003465303772815961Search in Google Scholar
Leybourne, S. J. 1995. “Testing for Unit Roots Using Forward and Reverse Dickey–Fuller Regressions.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics 57 (4): 559–71.10.1111/j.1468-0084.1995.tb00040.xSearch in Google Scholar
Li, J., and J. Lee. 2015. “Improved Autoregressive Forecasts in the Presence of Non-Normal Errors.” Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 85: 2936–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109136.Search in Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, R. L., and D. H. Papell. 1997. “Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit-Root Hypothesis.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (2): 212–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(82)90012-5.Search in Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J. G. 1991. “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests.” In Long-Run Economic Relationship: Readings in Cointegration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J. G. 1996. “Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (6): 601–18. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815961.Search in Google Scholar
Meng, M., K. S. Im, J. Lee, and M. A. Tieslau. 2014. “More Powerful LM Unit Root Tests with Non-normal Errors.” In Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, 343–57. New York, NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_11Search in Google Scholar
Nazlioglu, S., and J. Lee. 2020. “Response Surface Estimates of the LM Unit Root Tests.” Economics Letters 192: 109136. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2014.945930.Search in Google Scholar
Nelson, C. R., and C. R. Plosser. 1982. “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications.” Journal of Monetary Economics 10 (2): 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465397556791.Search in Google Scholar
Otero, J., and J. Smith. 2012. “Response Surface Models for the Leybourne Unit Root Tests and Lag Order Dependence.” Computational Statistics 27 (3): 473–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00180-011-0268-y.Search in Google Scholar
Perron, P. 1988. “Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Further Evidence from a New Approach.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12 (2-3): 297–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90043-7.Search in Google Scholar
Perron, P. 1989. “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis.” Econometrica 57 (6): 1361–401. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913712.Search in Google Scholar
Sephton, P. S. 1995. “Response Surface Estimates of the KPSS Stationarity Test.” Economics Letters 47 (3-4): 255–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(94)00561-f.Search in Google Scholar
Zivot, E., and D. W. K. Andrews. 1992. “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 10 (3): 251–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/1391541.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/snde-2019-0038).
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
