Erratum • The following article is Open access

Erratum: The 'pause' in global warming in historical context: II. Comparing models to observations (2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 123007)

, , , , , and

Published 26 March 2019 • © 2019 © 2018 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd
, , Citation Stephan Lewandowsky et al 2019 Environ. Res. Lett. 14 049601 DOI 10.1088/1748-9326/aafbb7

Download Article PDF
DownloadArticle ePub

You need an eReader or compatible software to experience the benefits of the ePub3 file format.

This is a correction for 2018 Environ. Res. Lett. 13 123007

Article metrics

1145 Total downloads

Share this article

Author e-mails

stephan.lewandowsky@bristol.ac.uk

Author affiliations

1 University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom

2 University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia

3 CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia

4 Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, United Kingdom

5 Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, State College, United States of America

6 Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Large Lakes Observatory, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, United States of America

7 Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States of America

8 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, D-14473, Germany

9 University of Potsdam, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, Potsdam, Germany

ORCID iDs

Dates

  1. Received 3 January 2019
  2. Accepted 3 January 2019
  3. Published

Check for updates using Crossmark

Peer review information

Method: Single-anonymous
Screened for originality? Yes

Buy this article in print

Journal RSS
Sign up for new issue notifications
1748-9326/14/4/049601

Export citation and abstract BibTeX RIS

Previous article in issue
Next article in issue

Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.

Figure 9 mistakenly duplicated figure 10 in the published article. This reflected a technical error during production. The correct figure 9 should be as follows:

Figure 9.

Figure 9. Monte Carlo comparison of broken GMST trends (GISTEMP) to a reference distribution of synthetic realizations of internal variability. Cell entries refer to the percentage of synthetic trends lower than that observed. See text for how trends are computed. Values below 5% are circled in yellow to indicate statistical significance. Vantage years refer to the end point of the trends being examined and both models and observations are historically-conditioned for that time.

Download figure:

Standard image High-resolution image
10.1088/1748-9326/aafbb7