Abstract
For many years of Japan’s long history, Japanese surnames have been handed down patrilineally. This study investigated relations between major surnames and Y chromosomal polymorphism among the Japanese male population. To analyze genetic phylogeny in namesakes, the Y-single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) plus Y-short tandem repeat (STR) approach was employed. A haplogroup based on SNPs and haplotypes at 17 STR loci were typed in 567 unrelated volunteers recruited in Kanagawa, Japan. Samples covered 27 common surnames such as Satoh and Suzuki, each name having 10–55 bearers. Significant difference was found for SNP haplogroup compositions and a multidimensional scaling plot using STR haplotypes in several surname groups. By contrast, these common surnames displayed wide diversity with phylogenetic networks, suggesting that no genetic drift event has occurred in their history. In all, 22 descent clusters were found, as judgcriteria ed by ad hoc of groups within five mutational steps in the 15 STR loci with the same haplogroup. The times of the most recent common ancestor ranged from 279 to over 2577 years. According to the approximate millennium span of Japanese surname history, descent criteria are expected to be reasonable for grouping within four step-neighbors. High heterogeneity of common surnames resembles that observed for England and Spain, but not for Ireland. Our results highlight that common Japanese surnames consist of descent clusters and many singletons, reflecting a mixture of long-term bearers and short-term bearers among the population. The genetic study of this population revealed characteristic features of Japanese surnames.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thomson R, Pritchard JK, Shen P, Oefner PJ, Feldman MW. Recent common ancestry of human Y chromosomes: evidence from DNA sequence data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:7360–5.
Jobling MA, Tyler-Smith C. Human Y-chromosome variation in the genome-sequencing era. Nat Rev Genet. 2017;18:485–97.
Hammer MF, Karafet TM, Park H, Omoto K, Harihara S, Stoneking M. Dual origins of the Japanese: common ground for hunter–gatherer and farmer Y chromosomes. J Hum Genet. 2006;51:47–58.
Purps J, Siegert S, Willuweit S, Nagy M, Alves C, Salazar R, et al. A global analysis of Y-chromosomal haplotype diversity for 23 STR loci. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;12:12–23.
Ballantyne KN, Goedbloed M, Fang R, Schaap O, Lao O, Wollstein A, et al. Mutability of Y-chromosomal microsatellites: rates, characteristics, molecular bases, and forensic implications. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87:341–53.
Wei W, Ayub Q, Xue Y, Tyler-Smith C. A comparison of Y-chromosomal lineage dating using either resequencing or Y-SNP plus Y-STR genotyping. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2013;7:568–72.
King TE, Jobling MA. Founders, drift, and infidelity: the relationship between Y chromosome diversity and patrilineal surnames. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26:1093–102.
Wang C, Yan S, Hou Z, Fu W, Xiong M, Han S, et al. Present Y chromosomes reveal the ancestry of Emperor Cao Cao of 1,800 years ago. J Hum Genet. 2012;57:216–8.
Wang C, Yan S, Yao C, Huang XY, Ao X, Wang Z, et al. Ancient DNA of emperor CAO Cao’s granduncle matches those of his present descendants. J Hum Genet. 2013;58:238–9.
Sykes B, Irven C. Surnames and the Y chromosome. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:1417–9.
Winney B, Boumertit A, Day T, Davison D, Echeta C, Evseeva I, et al. People of the British Isles: preliminary analysis of genotypes and surnames in a UK-control population. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:203–10.
McEvoy B, Bradley DG. Y-chromosomes and the extent of patrilineal ancestry in Irish surnames. Hum Genet. 2006;119:212–9.
King TE, Jobling MA. What’s in a name? Y chromosomes, surnames and the genetic genealogy revolution. Trends Genet. 2009;25:351–60.
Myoji-Yurai Net, Recstu Inc. https://myoji-yurai.net/. Accessed 30 Apr 2020.
Cheshire JA, Longley PA, Yano K, Nakaya T. Japanese surname regions. Pap Reg Sci. 2014;93:539–55.
Ochiai E, Minaguchi K, Nambiar P, Kakimoto Y, Satoh F, Nakatome M, et al. Evaluation of Y chromosomal SNP haplogrouping in the HID-Ion AmpliSeq™ Identity Panel. Leg Med. 2016;22:58–61.
Naitoh S, Kasahara-Nonaka I, Minaguchi K, Nambiar P. Assignment of Y-chromosomal SNPs found in Japanese population to Y-chromosomal haplogroup tree. J Hum Genet. 2013;58:195–201.
ISOGG (International Society of Genetic Genealogy): Y-DNA Haplogroup Tree 2019. http://www.isogg.org/tree/ Accessed 30 Apr 2020.
Ochiai E, Osawa M, Tamura T, Minaguchi K, Miyashita K, Matsushima Y, et al. Effects of using the GlobalFiler™ multiplex system on parent–child analyses of cases with single locus inconsistency. Leg Med. 2016;18:72–4.
Nei M, Tajima F. DNA polymorphism detectable by restriction endonucleases. Genetics 1981;97:145–63.
Martinez-Cadenas C, Blanco-Verea A, Hernando B, Busby GBJ, Brion M, Carracedo A, et al. The relationship between surname frequency and Y chromosome variation in Spain. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:120–8.
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL. Arlequin suite ver. 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10:564–7.
YHRD: Y-Chromosome STR Haplotype Reference Database. https://yhrd.org/ Accessed 30 Apr 2020.
The Center for Genetic Anthropology, University College London; www.ucl.ac.uk/tcga/software/ Accessed 30 Apr 2020.
Behar DM, Thomas MG, Skorecki K, Hammer MF, Bulygina E, Rosengarten D, et al. Multiple origins of Ashkenazi Levites: Y chromosome evidence for both Near Eastern and European ancestries. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;73:768–79.
Fenner JN. Cross-cultural estimation of the human generation interval for use in genetics-based population divergence studies. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;128:415–23.
Watahiki H, Fujii K, Fukagawa T, Mita Y, Kitayama T, Mizuno N. Polymorphisms and microvariant sequences in the Japanese population for 25 Y-STR markers and their relationships to Y-chromosome haplogroups. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;41:e1–7.
Helgason A, Hrafnkelsson B, Gulcher JR, Ward R, Stefánsson K. A population-wide coalescent analysis of Icelandic matrilineal and patrilineal genealogies: evidence for a faster evolutionary rate of mtDNA lineages than Y chromosomes. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72:1370–88.
Kim SH, Jung J, Cho NS, Hwang JH, Yoo SY, Seong KM, et al. Y-STR genetic structure of the most common surnames in Korea. Genes. Genomics 2009;31:243–9.
Shi CM, Li C, Ma L, Chi L, Zhao J, Yuan W, et al. Inferring Chinese surnames with Y-STR profiles. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;33:66–71.
Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013;339:321–4.
Kayser M. Forensic use of Y-chromosome DNA: a general overview. Hum Genet. 2017;136:621–35.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all sample donors. We also thank Akinori Takase and Dr Masayuki Tanaka, Support Center for Medical Research and Education, Tokai University School of Medicine, for their supporting bioinformatic analyses. This study was supported by the Tokai University General Research Organization Grant, and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (grant number 19K19489 to EO).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ochiai, E., Osawa, M., Satoh, S. et al. Y chromosome analysis for common surnames in the Japanese male population. J Hum Genet 66, 731–738 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-00884-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s10038-020-00884-9