Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:11:32.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Studies on Micas: A Synthesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Hatten S. Yoder Jr.
Hatten S. Yoder Jr.*
Affiliation:
Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C., USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The principal end members of the micas believed to be common in sediments have been synthesized and some of their stability relations determined. The polymorphs of muscovite and paragonite, the principal dioctahedral end members, obtained were 1Md, 1M and 2M1, and those of phlogopite and annite, the principal trioctahedral end members, 1Md and 1M or 3T. The range of stability of each of the polymorphs could not be fixed accurately because of the slow rate of transformation; however, the transformations 1Md → 1M → 2M1 were effected for muscovite and paragonite and 1M → 1Md or 3T and 2M1 → 1M or 3T for phlogopite. The growth characteristics of these micas in the laboratory are believed to be analogous to the formation of micas in sediments.

Knowledge of the synthetic mica.s contributes greatly to an understanding of the natural materials called illite, hydromica, and high-silica sericite. The dioctahedral members of these materials and related minerals may be delineated accurately in the system muscovite—Al-celadonite—pyrophyllite and their iron analogues. The trioctahedral members of some of the same materials may be outlined in the system phlogopite— eastonite—tale and their iron analogues. The postulated substitution schemes in these systems are mainly MgSi ⇌ AlVIAlIV, KAl ⇌ Si, and H3O ⇌ K. In materials intermediate between these systems, such as most biotites and vormiculites, the substitution of 3Mg ⇌ 2AlVI is of major importance. The mixed-layer structures involving micas are elucidated.

Type
Article
Information
Clays and Clay Minerals (National Conference on Clays and Clay Minerals) , Volume 6 , February 1957 , pp. 42 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Clay Minerals Society 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abelson, P. H. (1954) Annual report of the Director of the Geophysical Laboratory, 1953-1954: Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book No. 53, pp. 95–145.Google Scholar
Abelson, P. II. (1955) Annual report of the Director of the Geophysical Laboratory, 1954-1955: Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book No. 54, pp. 95–152.Google Scholar
Abelson, P. H. (1956) Annual report of the Director of the Geophysical Laboratory, 1955-1956: Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book No. 55, pp. 153–229.Google Scholar
Abelson, P. H. (1957) Annual report of the Director of the Geophysical Laboratory, 1956-1957: Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book No. 56, pp. 151–252.Google Scholar
Amelinckx, Séverin and Dekeyser, Willy (1953) Le polytypisme des minéraux micacés et argileux. I. Observations et leurs interprétations: C. B. 19th Session Congr. Géol. Int., C.I.P.E.A., fascicule 18, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
Axelrod, J. M. and Grimaldi, F. S. (1949) Muscovite with small optic axial angle Amer. Min., v. 34, pp. 559–572.Google Scholar
Barshad, I. (1948) Vermieulite and its relation to biotite as revealed by base exchange reactions, x-ray analyses, differential thermal curves, and water content: Amer. Min., v. 33, pp. 655–678.Google Scholar
Bragg, W. L. (1937) Atomic Structure of Minerals: Cornell University Pi-ess, Ithaca, N.Y., 292 pp.Google Scholar
Brindley, G. W. (1951) Z-Eay Identification and Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals: The Mineralogical Society, London, 345 pp.Google Scholar
Dietrich, R. V. (1956) Trigonal paragonite from Campbell and Franklin Counties, Virginia: Amer. Min., v. 41, p. 940–942.Google Scholar
Eugster, H. P. (1956) Muscovite-paragonite join and its use as a geologic thermometer: Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., v. 67, p. 1693 (abstract).Google Scholar
Eugster, H. P. (1956a) Synthesis and phase relations of the biotites: Amer. Geophys. Union Program Abstracts, p. 42 (abstract).Google Scholar
Eugster, H. P. (1957) Heterogeneous reactions involving oxidation and reduction at high pressures and temperatures: J. Chem. Plvys., v. 26, p. 1760.Google Scholar
Eugster, H. P. and Yoder, H. S. (1954) Stability and occurrence of paragonite: Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., v. 65, p. 1248 (abstract).Google Scholar
Foster, M. D. (1957) Interpretation of the composition of the “trioctahedral” micas: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull, (in press).Google Scholar
Gower, J. A. (1957) x-ray measurement of the iron-magnesium ratio in biotites: Amer. J. Sci., v. 255, pp. 142–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R. E. (1953) Clay Mineralogy: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York, 384 pp.Google Scholar
Grootemaat, T. B. and Holland, H. D. (1955) Sodium and potassium content of muscovites from the Peerless pegmatite, Black Hills, South Dakota: Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., v. 66, p. 1569 (abstract).Google Scholar
Hendricks, S. B. and Jefferson, M. E. (1939) Polymorphism of the micas, with optical measurements: Amer. Min., v. 26, pp. 729–771.Google Scholar
Hendricks, S. B. and Ross, C. S. (1941) Chemical composition and genesis of glauconite and celadonite: Amer. Min., v. 26, pp. 683–708.Google Scholar
Levinson, A. A. (1953) Studies in the mica group; relationship between polymorphism and composition in the muscovite—lepidolite series: Amer. Min., v. 38, pp 88–107.Google Scholar
Morey, G. W. (1953) Annual report of the Director of the Geophysical Laboratory, 1952–1953: Carnegie Institution of Washington Year Book No. 52, pp. 39–96.Google Scholar
Rosenfeld, J. L. (1956) Paragonite in the schist of Glebe Mountain, southern Vermont: Amer. Min., v. 41, pp. 144r–147.Google Scholar
Ross, C. S. and Hendricks, S. B. (1945) Minerals of the montmorillonite group, their origin and relation to soils and clays: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 205-B, pp. 23–79.Google Scholar
Schaller, W. T. (1950) An interpretation of the composition of high-silica serieites: Min. Mag., v. 29, pp. 406–415.Google Scholar
Schaller, W. T. and Stevens, R. E. (1941) The validity of paragonite as a mineral species: Amer. Min., v. 26, pp. 541–545.Google Scholar
Smith, J. V. and Yoder, H. S. (1956) Experimental and theoretical studies of the mica polymorphs: Min. Mag., v. 31, pp. 209–235.Google Scholar
Stevens, R. E. (1938) New analyses of lepidolites and their interpretation: Amer. Min., v. 23, pp. 607–628.Google Scholar
Walker, G. F. (1950) Trioetahedi-al minerals in the soil-clays of northeast Scotland: Min. Mag., v. 29, pp. 72–84.Google Scholar
Winchell, A. N. (1925) Studies in the mica group—Part I: Amer. J. Sei., ser. 5, v. 9, pp. 309–327.Google Scholar
Yoder, H. S. and Eugster, H. P. (1954) Phlogopite synthesis and stability range: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 6, pp. 157–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, H. S. and Eugster, H. P. (1955) Synthetic and natural muscovites: Geochim. Gosmochim. Acta, v. 8, pp. 225–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar