Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T19:10:25.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Iron I/IIA Transition in the Levant: A Reply to Mazar and Bronk Ramsey and a New Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Israel Finkelstein  and
Eli Piasetzky
Israel Finkelstein
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Civilizations, Tel Aviv University, Israel. Email: fink2@post.tau.ac.il.
Eli Piasetzky
Affiliation:
School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mazar and Bronk Ramsey (2008) recently proposed that the Iron I/IIA transition in the Levant took place during the first half of the 10th century. In the first part of this article, we challenge their method and conclusions. We argue against the inclusion of charcoal in their model, which could lead to an “old wood effect.” We also argue that in dealing with a transition date, all available data must be taken into consideration. In the second part of the article, we propose Bayesian Model I for the Iron I/IIA transition, which is based on 2 sets of data—for the periods immediately before and after this transition. Our model, along with the other 11 published Bayesian models for this transition that used only short-lived samples, agrees with the Low Chronology system for the Iron Age strata in the Levant and negates all other proposals, including Mazar's Modified Conventional Chronology. The Iron I/IIA transition occurred during the second half of the 10th century. In the third part of the article, we present a new insight on the Iron I/IIA transition. We propose that the late Iron I cities came to an end in a gradual process and interpret this proposal with Bayesian Model II.

Mazar and Bronk Ramsey (2008) recently challenged Sharon et al. (2007; also Boaretto et al. 2005) and us (e.g. Finkelstein and Piasetzky 2003, 2007a,b) regarding the date of transition from the Iron I to the Iron IIA in the Levant. While we and Sharon et al. placed this transition in the second half of the 10th century BCE, Mazar and Bronk Ramsey positioned it “during the first half of the 10th century BCE” and argued that “the second half of the 10th century BCE should be included in the Iron IIA” (Mazar and Bronk Ramsey 2008:178). We discuss some problems in the methodology of Mazar and Bronk Ramsey that may have influenced their results. In particular, we discuss 1) the exclusion of data; 2) the inclusion of data (charcoal samples); and 3) show that even according to Mazar and Bronk Ramsey, excluding these samples position the late Iron I/IIA transition in the late 10th century. Finally, we present our own 2 Bayesian models for the Iron I/IIA transition.

Type
Comments
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 4 , 2010 , pp. 1667 - 1680
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Arie, E. 2006. The Iron Age I pottery: Levels K-5 and K-4 and an intra-site spatial analysis of the pottery from Stratum VIA. In: Finkelstein, I, Ussishkin, D, Halpern, B, editors. Megiddo IV: The 1998–2002 Seasons. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University. p 191–298.Google Scholar
Beck, P, Kochavi, M. 1985. A dated assemblage of the late 13th century B.C.E. from the Egyptian residency at Aphek. Tel Aviv 12:29–42.Google Scholar
Boaretto, E, Jull, AJT, Gilboa, A, Sharon, I. 2005. Dating the Iron I/II transition in Israel: first intercomparison results. Radiocarbon 47(1):39–55.Google Scholar
Boaretto, E, Finkelstein, I, Shahack-Gross, R. 2010. Radiocarbon results from the Iron IIA site of Atar Haroa in the Negev Highlands and their archaeological and historical implications. Radiocarbon 52(1):1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2):425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Cahill, JM. 2006. The excavations at Tell el-Hammah: a prelude to Amihai Mazar's Beth-Shean Valley Regional Project. In: Maeir, AM, de Miroschedji, P, editors. I Will Speak the Riddles of Ancient Times”: Archaeological and Historical Studies in Honor of Amihai Mazar. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns. p 429–59.Google Scholar
Carmi, I, Ussishkin, D. 2004. 14C dates. In: Ussishkin, D. The Renewed Archaeological Excavations at Lachish (1973–1994), Volume V. Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology. p 2508–13.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, I. 1988. The Archaeology of the Israelite Settlement. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, I. 1996. The archaeology of the United Monarchy: an alternative view. Levant 28:177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, I, Piasetzky, E. 2003. Recent radiocarbon results and King Solomon. Antiquity 77(298):771–9.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, I, Piasetzky, E. 2006. 14C and the Iron Age chronology debate: Rehov, Khirbet en-Nahas, Dan, and Megiddo. Radiocarbon 48(3):373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelstein, I, Piasetzky, E. 2007a. Radiocarbon and Philistine chronology. Egypt and the Levant 17:74–82.Google Scholar
Finkelstein, I, Piasetzky, E. 2007b. Radiocarbon dating and the Late-Iron I in northern Canaan: a new proposal. Ugarit-Forschungen 39:247–60.Google Scholar
Gadot, Y. 2003. Continuity and change: cultural processes in the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages in Israel's central coastal plain [PhD dissertation]. Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Gadot, Y, Martin, M, Blockman, N, Arie, E. 2006. Area K (Levels K-5 and K-4, the 1998–2002 seasons). In: Finkelstein, I, Ussishkin, D, Halpern, B, editors. Megiddo IV: The 1998–2002 Seasons. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University. p 87–103.Google Scholar
Gilboa, A, Sharon, I. 2003. An archaeological contribution to the Early Iron Age chronological debate: alternative chronologies for Phoenicia and their effects on the Levant, Cyprus, and Greece. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 332:7–80.Google Scholar
Herzog, Z, Singer-Avitz, L. 2004. Redefining the centre: the emergence of state in Judah. Tel Aviv 31:209–44.Google Scholar
Herzog, Z, Singer-Avitz, L. 2006. Sub-dividing the Iron IIA in northern Israel: a suggested solution to the chronological debate. Tel Aviv 33:163–95.Google Scholar
Humbert, J-B. 1980. Les fouilles: objectifs, méthode, stratigraphie. In: Briend, J, Humbert, J-B, editors. Tell Keisan (1971–1976): une cité phénicienne en Galilée. Paris: Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis. p 13–29.Google Scholar
Kochavi, M. 1998. The eleventh century BCE tripartite pillar building at Tel Hadar. In: Gitin, S, Mazar, A, Stern, E, editors. Mediterranean Peoples in Transition. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society. p 468–78.Google Scholar
Mazar, A. 1980. Excavations at Tell Qasile Part One, The Philistine Sanctuary: Architecture and Cult Objects (Qedem 12). Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Mazar, A. 1981. Giloh: an early Israelite settlement site near Jerusalem. Israel Exploration Journal 31:1–36.Google Scholar
Mazar, A. 1985. Excavations at Tell Qasile Part Two, The Philistine Sanctuary: Various Finds, The Pottery, Conclusions, Appendixes (Qedem 20). Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Mazar, A. 2005. The debate over the chronology of the Iron Age in the Southern Levant: its history, the current situation, and a suggested resolution. In: Levy, TE, Higham, T, editors. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science. London: Equinox. p 15–30.Google Scholar
Mazar, A, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2008. 14C dates and the Iron Age chronology of Israel: a response. Radiocarbon 50(2):159–80.Google Scholar
Mazar, A, Bruins, HJ, Panitz-Cohen, N, van der Plicht, J. 2005. Ladder of time at Tel Rehov: stratigraphy, archaeological context, pottery and radiocarbon dates. In: Levy, TE, Higham, T, editors. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science. London: Equinox. p 193–255.Google Scholar
Mazar, A, Panitz-Cohen, N. 2001. Timnah (Tel Batash) II: The Finds from the First Millennium BCE, Text (Qedem 42). Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society.Google Scholar
Schiffer, MB. 1986. Radiocarbon dating and the “old wood” problem: the case of the Hohokam chronology. Journal of Archaeological Science 13(1):13–30.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P, Bryant, C, O'Donnell, D. 2007. A report on Phase 1 of the 5th International Radiocarbon Intercomparison (VIRI). Radiocarbon 49(2):409–26.Google Scholar
Shahack-Gross, R, Finkelstein, I. 2008. Subsistence practices in an arid environment: a geoarchaeological investigation in an Iron Age site, the Negev Highlands, Israel. Journal of Archaeological Science 35(4):965–82.Google Scholar
Sharon, I. 2001. ‘Transition dating’ – a heuristic mathematical approach to the collation of radiocarbon dates from stratified sequences. Radiocarbon 43(2A):345–54.Google Scholar
Sharon, I, Gilboa, A, Jull, AJT, Boaretto, E. 2007. Report on the first stage of the Iron Age Dating Project in Israel: supporting a Low Chronology. Radiocarbon 49(1):1–46.Google Scholar
Zarzecki-Peleg, A. 2005. Stratigraphy and architecture. In: Ben-Tor, A, Zarzecki-Peleg, A, Cohen-Anidjar, S. Yoqne'am II: The Iron Age and the Persian Period. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society. p 5–232.Google Scholar
Zimhoni, O. 1997. Studies in the Iron Age Pottery of Israel: Typological, Archaeological and Chronological Aspects. Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology.Google Scholar