Next Article in Journal
Dietary Patterns Independent of Fast Food Are Associated with Obesity among Korean Adults: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2014
Previous Article in Journal
The Importance of Lactose in the Human Diet: Outcomes of a Mexican Consensus Meeting
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/nu11112738
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nutritional Content According to the Presence of Front of Package Marketing Strategies: The Case of Ultra-Processed Snack Food Products Purchased in Costa Rica

by
Tatiana Gamboa-Gamboa
1,*,
Adriana Blanco-Metzler
2,
Stefanie Vandevijvere
3,
Manuel Ramirez-Zea
4 and
Maria F. Kroker-Lobos
4
1
School of Public Health, Universidad de Costa Rica, Montes de Oca, San Jose 11501, Costa Rica
2
Costa Rican Institute of Research and Teaching in Nutrition and Health (INCIENSA), Curridabat, Cartago 4-2250, Costa Rica
3
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
4
INCAP Research Center for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City 1188, Guatemala
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2019, 11(11), 2738; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112738
Submission received: 11 September 2019 / Revised: 15 October 2019 / Accepted: 22 October 2019 / Published: 12 November 2019
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The industry uses nutrition and health claims, premium offers, and promotional characters as marketing strategies (MS). The inclusion of these MS on ultra-processed products may influence child and adolescent purchase behavior. This study determined the proportion of foods carrying claims and marketing strategies, also the proportion of products with critical nutrients declaration, and nutritional profile differences between products that carry or not claims and MS on the front-of-package (FoP) of ultra-processed food products sold in Costa Rica. Data were obtained from 2423 photographs of seven food groups consumed as snacks that were sold in one of the most widespread and popular hypermarket chains in Costa Rica in 2015. Ten percent of products lacked a nutrition facts panel. Sodium was the least reported critical nutrient. Energy and critical nutrients were significantly highest in products that did not include any nutrition or health claim and in products that included at least one MS. Forty-four percent and 10% of all products displayed at least one nutrition or at least one health claim, respectively, and 23% displayed at least one MS. In conclusion, regulations are needed to restrict claims and marketing on ultra-processed food packages to generate healthier food environments and contribute to the prevention of childhood and adolescent obesity in Costa Rica.

1. Introduction

North, Central, and South America have the highest prevalence of childhood obesity in the world [1,2]. Specifically, the proportion of Latin American children with excess weight is more than 20% in more than one third of the countries [2]. Costa Rica is no exception, where 34% of children between 6 to 12 years old are overweight or obese [3]. An obesogenic food environment, characterized by ultra-processed food products highly available and advertised, is one of the significant drivers of obesity that could be preventable [4,5,6].
Evidence suggests a strong association between the rise of childhood and adolescent obesity and an increase in daily snacking [7]. Snacking is associated with a greater intake of high energy dense ultra-processed food products such as sweetened caloric beverages, salty snacks, breakfast cereals, muffins, cookies, cereal bars, and confectionery [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Snacks are often ultra-processed products containing high calories content, added sugars, sodium, and saturated fat, and a small quantity of fiber and micronutrients [14,15,16].
Food and beverage packages are used as valuable marketing tools to motivate people to buy and consume them [17]. Nutrition and health claims, premium offers, and promotional characters are common marketing strategies (MS) used by the food industry. The front-of-package (FoP) labeling is the most visible part of the package. It displays pictorial and, symbolic elements, and short text claims in a place where they are more likely to receive consumers’ attention [18,19]. The inclusion of these MS on ultra-processed products may influence child and adolescent purchasing requests and food preferences [20,21]. A meta-analysis concluded that health and nutrition claims have substantial effects on dietary choices, but studies agree that it depends on the type of product [22].
Additionally, premium offers and promotional characters encourage and motivate children to think that products are healthier and funny than others [23]. Many studies confirm the vulnerability of children because of their inability to understand the persuasive intent or such marketing strategies [24,25,26,27]. These strategies may lead to excessive consumption of ultra-processed foods with the corresponding high intake of added sugars, saturated fats, trans fat, sodium, and calories [20,24,28].
Recommended actions for overweight and obesity prevention in children and adolescents include the improvement of policies and regulations to decrease the consumption of unhealthy foods. FoP labeling and healthy school food environments (food provision in school cafeterias) are among the recommended actions [13]. The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) has developed a Nutrient Profile to determine the criteria for acceptable amounts of critical nutrients such as salt, added sugars, saturated fats, and trans fats, which can be helpful when designing such policies [14].
Policies that regulate food advertising and FoP labeling have being implemented in different countries [21]. At the regional level, Chile is a pioneer country where all forms of promotion aimed at children under 14 years of age, are prohibited. Moreover, a FoP warning label system has been established to inform consumers when a product exceeds thresholds for sodium, saturated fat, added sugars, and energy [21,28].
In Costa Rica, the food industry follows the Central American Technical Regulation for General Labelling of Food Products and the Central American Technical Regulation of Nutrition Labeling, which is based on the CODEX Alimentarius. However, this last regulation establishes voluntary declaration of critical nutrients such as added sugars, sodium, or fat, except when a health or nutrition claim is displayed, and no effort has been made to implement a base-evidence FoP labeling systems or marketing regulation targeted to children [29,30,31].
A previous study in Costa Rica found that 79% of breakfast cereals and 79% of dairy products displayed a nutrition claim, and 22.3% of products displayed at least one promotional character [21].
Food packages can serve as a tool for consumers to make informed decisions about their food choices. Little is known about the information on ultra-processed food products commonly consumed among children and adolescents in Costa Rica. That is why the results of this research could be valuable evidence for future improvements in the regulation of food labeling practices.
Therefore, this study aims to determine: (1) the proportion of foods carrying claims and marketing strategies, (2) proportion of products with critical nutrients declaration and (3) nutritional profile differences between products that carry or not claims and MS on the FoP of ultra-processed food products sold in Costa Rica.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Procedure

This study was a cross-sectional analysis of food label information from a database of photographs of all the food and beverage (n = 7953) sold in one of the most widespread and popular supermarket chains in Costa Rica. Since 88% of Costa Rican consumers purchase their foods in supermarkets [32], it is likely that a large proportion of products commonly purchased was captured. The database was done in 2015 as part of the National Salt Reduction Program [33,34]. Trained research assistants visited the supermarket (researchers selected the location by convenience) and photographed all packaged products with a smartphone application designed for this purpose. They included the information in the database system administered by the George Institute for Global Health in Australia [35]. Photographs included FoP, nutrient content, and ingredient information.

2.2. Selection of Food Categories to Be Included in the Analysis

We selected ultra-processed food and beverage products commonly consumed as snacks by children and adolescents, including: non-alcoholic beverages with and without added sugars, savory snacks, sweetened milk beverages, breakfast cereals, muffins, cookies, cakes, pastries, cereal bars and confectionery (Figure 1). These categories were selected because they are energy-dense, low-nutrient foods commonly consumed as snacks by children and adolescents and also due to their association with overweight, obesity [9,10,11,13,14,15,16,36,37].
We excluded fresh, culinary ingredients and, minimally processed and processed food products. Food groups excluded were: convenience foods, bread and bakery, edible oils and oil emulsions products, eggs, fruit and vegetables, sauces and spreads, fish and seafood products, processed fish, meat and meat products, sugar, honey, and related products. From 7953 products included in the database, 5496 were excluded because they were not from the selected food groups. Fifty-five additional products were excluded due to unreadable picture information, duplicate products, or missing packages, including a total of 2402 products for the present analysis.

2.3. Data and Measures

Nutritional composition information (energy, total fat, trans fat, saturated fat, added sugars, and sodium) was obtained from the nutritional facts panel (NFP) captured in the pictures of the products. The nutrition and health claims and the presence of marketing strategies such as promotional characters and premium offers were obtained from the FoP label. All variables were assessed and classified according to the standardized international methodology of the International Network for Food and Obesity/NCDs Research, Monitoring and Action Support (INFORMAS) [38].
For claim and MS identification and classification, two research assistants were trained by the first author using the INFORMAS protocol (Supplementary Materials shows examples of the classification of claims and MS). After the training, double data entry was performed in forty randomly selected products. In case of discrepancies, the first author discussed the results with the research assistants to reach a consensus. Cohen’s kappa statistic was used to test interrater reliability. A k value higher than 0.8 was achieved.

2.3.1. Nutrition and Health Claims

Nutrition claims are any representation, which states, suggests or implies that a food has particular nutritional property including but not limited to the energy value and the content of protein, fat, and carbohydrates, as well as the content of vitamins and minerals [31,38]. Nutrition claims include health-related ingredient claims, nutrient content claims, and nutrient comparison claims.
Health claims are any representation that states, suggests, or implies that a relationship exists between a food or a constituent of that food and health [31,38]. Health claims include general health claims, nutrient and other function claims and reduction of disease risk claims.

2.3.2. Marketing Strategies

Marketing strategies were classified as promotional strategies and premium offers. Promotional strategies included: cartoon or company owned character, licensed character, amateur sports person, celebrity, movie tie-in, famous sports person or team, on-sports, historical events or festivals, and characters for kids. Premium offers included: game and app downloads, contests, buy two get one free, 20% extra or similar, limited edition, social charity, gift or collectable.

2.4. Declaration of Critical Nutrients and Nutritional Content

The percentage of products that reported critical nutrients for each food category was calculated, estimating the number of products that reported critical nutrients divided into the total number of products per food category. Additionally, we extracted the nutritional content of energy, total fat, saturated fat, trans fat, sugar, and sodium from the NFP.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

We estimated the proportion of products reporting critical nutrients in each food category, and compared energy and nutrient density (per 100 g or 100 mL) for products with and without claims and marketing strategies on the FoP. Variables with a non-parametric distribution, such as energy and nutrient composition of food products were expressed in medians and interquartile ranges (25th–75th percentile). Additionally, the total number of claims, claim type and the number of products carrying claims for each claim type was determined.
The Mann Whitney test (95%CI) was used to determine differences of nutritional content by the presence or not of claims and marketing strategies. The Marascuillo procedure was used to test the differences between the proportion of products that included claims and marketing strategies on the FoP of the seven different food categories. A Chi square test (95%CI) was performed to compare the content of energy and critical nutrients, of products with or without at least one claim or marketing strategy in the FoP. STATA 14.0 (StataCorp, Texas, USA) and Excel 15.13.3 (Microsoft Corporation, Washington, DC, USA) were used for all statistical analyses. We hypothesized that products that displayed claims and marketing strategies have higher critical nutrient content than the rest.

3. Results

A total of 2042 (97%) products representing seven food categories were included in the analysis (Figure 2). The food categories with more products were non-alcoholic beverages with added sugar (27%) and bakery products (cakes, sweet biscuits, and pastries) (26%).

3.1. Nutritional Content

Table 1 shows the nutritional content of food and beverage products. The categories with the highest energy density (≥400 kcal/100 g) were savory snacks (500 kcal/100 g), cakes (440 kcal/100 g), sweet biscuits, and pastries, and confectionary products (400 kcal/100 g). Total fat was higher in savory snacks (26.0 g/100 g) than in cakes, sweet biscuits, and pastries (16.7 g/100 g). These two groups and confectionary products had the highest content of saturated fat (>6.5 g/100 g). Total added sugars content (>25 g/100 g) was highest in confectionery products (53.2 g/100 g), breakfast cereals (28.8 g/100 g), cakes, sweet biscuits and pastries (25.9 g/100 g). Finally, sodium (>300 mg/100 g) was the highest in savory snacks (571 mg/100 g), breakfast cereals (367 g/100 g), and cakes, sweet biscuits and pastries (333 mg/100 g). Since trans fats content was 0 grams in products, trans fats were excluded from all the statistical analysis.

3.2. Declaration of Critical Nutrients

Table 1 shows the proportion of food products that declare critical nutrients in their NFP. Total fat (78%), saturated fat (74%), and sodium (77%) were less-commonly reported on packages of cakes, sweet biscuits, and pastries than on those of other food categories. Total added sugars were the least often reported on packages of savory snacks (67%). The least reported critical nutrient in all food categories were total added sugars (79%) and saturated fat (83%). Energy (90%) and total fat (90%) were the nutrients most reported in all food groups, and sugar (79%) was the least reported critical nutrient.

3.3. Claims

Table 2 shows claims included on FoP. Across all food categories, nutrition claims were more prevalent than health claims (43% of products with at least one nutrition claim versus 9% with at least one health claim). Only 7% of sweetened milk beverages and drinks without added sugar and 15% of breakfast cereals did not carry any nutrition claim on the FoP. Regarding health claims, sweetened milk beverages (53%) and breakfast cereals (19%) were the categories with most products with at least one health claim on the FoP. Products with the lowest number of nutrition and health claims were cakes, sweet biscuits, and pastries (13% and, 3% respectively) and confectionary products (24% and 2% respectively).
Overall, nutrient content claims referring to vitamin, minerals, and sugar were most prevalent (44%) (Figure 3). Moreover, 62% of sweetened milk beverages and 33% of breakfast cereals displayed more than four nutrition or health claims in their FoP. General health claims were the most common type of health claim on the FoP (73%). Claims that referred to a “healthy product” that use words like “goodness”, “nutritious” or “super” to describe the product, and claims that referred to low glycemic index or energy density were the most commonly used general health claims (50% and 15%, respectively.
Table 3 shows a comparison between energy content and critical nutrients between products with and without at least one claim in the FoP. Energy and critical nutrients were significantly higher in products that do not include any nutrition or health claim.

3.4. Promotional Marketing Strategies

The presence of promotional characters on the FoP was highest in breakfast cereals (45%) and savory snacks (43%) and lowest in non-alcoholic drinks without sugar and with added sugars (3 and 11% respectively). The presence of premium offers on FoP was highest in breakfast cereals (15%), drinks without added sugar did not include premium offers in their FoP (Table 2).
Promotional characters commonly displayed on these products were cartoons and company-owned characters (74%), promotional characters for kids (13%). Premium offers commonly used were collectible gifts (34%) and contest (32%) (for example, keep two packages and change for one product or active codes).
Table 3 shows that the content of critical nutrients was significantly higher in products that displayed at least one promotional character on their FoP, compared to products that did not. Sodium (p = 0.00) and added sugar content (p = 0.01) were significantly higher in products that included at least one premium offer, compared to products that did not include premium offers in the FoP. No significant differences were found in the rest of the nutrients.

4. Discussion

This study is the first in Costa Rica to determine differences in critical nutrient and energy content of snacking products according to the presence or absence of specific claims and MS on the FoP labels of ultra-processed snack food products from Costa Rica.
Our main finding is that the nutritional profile of products that included promotional characters and premium offers in their FoP were less healthy than those products that did not include them. Similar results were found in other studies in which they concluded that products that try to engage children with their packaging design are less nutritious than foods that do not. Meanwhile, product packages that suggest nutritional benefits with their claims have more nutritious content [25,39,40], and nutrient profiles were healthier in products that displayed nutrition and health claims in their FoP. These results are similar to a Canadian study, in which they found that nutrient profile was poorer in those foods and beverages that did not include nutrition claims [41].
In our study, marketing strategies and claims were displayed on all ultra-processed snack food products. Our findings are consistent with recent studies performed in New Zealand, Ireland, United Kingdom, Brazil, showing widespread use of claims in food products targeted to children. Findings suggest that a lack of regulations could be the reason for this situation [42,43,44,45].
A lack of critical nutrient declaration on the most purchased products is a matter a concern, as an excess of critical nutrient consumption including sodium, fat, energy and added sugars are strongly associated with the onset of obesity and non-communicable diseases such as hypertension, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases [46,47,48,49,50].
In 2011, Blanco-Metzler analyzed the display of energy, total fat, saturated fat, and sodium on prepackaged food marketed in Costa Rica. From 2011 to 2015 the percentage of critical nutrients reported in the NFP has increased by 25% according to our study and the study mentioned before [51].
The proportion of sweetened milk beverages, breakfast cereals, drinks with and without added sugars with nutrition claims were higher than for the other food categories. Additionally, breakfast cereals and sweetened milk beverages were the categories with the highest number of claims (nutrition and health claims) on the FoP label. Nutrient content claims were the most popular type of claim use in food products. Findings from a recent study in Canada show that nutrient content claim was the most common claim used [41]. Additionally, sweetened milk beverages was the category with the highest number of health claims. Similar results were observed in previous studies in Costa Rica [21,51]. Consistent with other studies, products with at least one nutrition or health claim had a lower content of critical nutrients compared to those without such claims [43].
Breakfast cereals and savory snacks were the food categories with the highest proportion of promotional strategies on FoP labeling. These data are relevant because according to our nutrient profiles analyses, breakfast cereals is the food category with a higher content of added sugars and sodium. These results are consistent with a New Zealand study that analyzed the nutritional composition of some food categories and found that 58% of breakfast cereals for children were classified as less healthy [52]. Similarly, the savory snacks category is one of the categories with a higher content of saturated fat and sodium, implying that products with higher use of MS are less healthy. Additionally, it is well known that these strategies directly affect the selection of products in children [23,24,25,26,27]. Experimental studies showed that the presence of promotional characters could increase children’s appetite, preference for, choice of, and intake of less healthy foods [24]. Regarding parents’ influence, an experimental study found that parents believe the product was healthier based on the presence of health claims [18].
In Costa Rica, the food industry follows the Central American Technical Regulation of Nutrition Labeling, which is based on the CODEX Alimentarius voluntary guidelines [31]. However, this regulation has some weaknesses as reporting of critical nutrients such as added sugars, sodium, or fat is not mandatory, except when a health or nutrition claim is displayed [30]. In addition, there is no regulation about the veracity of claims included on food product packages; therefore, many health claims are confusing and can motivate consumers to buy some products [50].
This evidence suggests the importance of including a national regulation. In Latin America, some countries have already introduced regulations for unhealthy food marketing targeted to children. The Law of Nutritional Composition of Food and Advertising from Chile could be a model for Costa Rica. This regulation classifies food products as high or low content of calories, saturated fat, added sugars, and sodium content, and restricts all kinds of promotional strategies of food products with a high content of those critical nutrients. Another advantage of the law is that all food products exceeding these limits have to include a black and white nutritional warning system in the FoP [28,53]. Similar examples are being followed by Uruguay and Peru [54,55].

5. Conclusions

This study has some limitations. Firstly, the information about food products came from only one supermarket; nonetheless, it is one of the most popular and largest supermarket chains in the country. Another limitation is that there was not a nutrient profile, with established limits for the food categories selected, in order to classify them as healthy and unhealthy. The nutrient profile from PAHO and WHO classified all products as unhealthy, so we were unable to make comparisons between healthier and unhealthier products within the same categories. Lastly, some photographs of food packages were incomplete and therefore, the package could not be analyzed thoroughly.
Our study provides evidence of the abundant use of marketing strategies in ultra-processed food products commonly targeted to children and adolescents in Costa Rica. Additionally, our results highlight the use of promotional characters and premium offers as MS in the FoP of snacking products, particularly in foods and beverages with poorer nutritional profiles. These results can be used for taking action against obesity in the country. Further, there is an urgent need for health authorities to develop regulations that restrict or ban the use of these strategies in unhealthy snacks and beverages products. These regulations have to be useful for verifying the accuracy and veracity of health and nutrition claims displayed on labels. Finally, the inclusion of an evidence-based FoP labelling system, easy to understand for the population, should be included in legislation to generate healthier food environments and contribute to the prevention of childhood and adolescent obesity in Costa Rica.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/11/2738/s1, Supplementary material: Definition and example of nutrition and health claims (30, 31).

Author Contributions

T.G.-G. adjusted the research protocol from INFORMAS. A.B.-M. led the project were the food packages information was collected and database created. T.G.-G., M.F.K.-L. outlined the plan for the analysis. T.G.-G. conducted the data organization and analysis and wrote the initial version of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by International Development Research Centre (M.R.-Z., grant number 107213-002), (A.B.-M., grant number 106 888).

Acknowledgments

To Melissa Jensen and Alvaro Carrascal who critically revised the final manuscript. To project IDRC 106 888 “Implementation of a population-wide program to reduce salt/sodium consumption in Costa Rica for the database”. The opinions expressed in this article are of the authors’ own and do not reflect the opinion of the IDRC or their board of governors (Memorandum of Grant Conditions IDRC-FUNDEVI project # 106888001, 14 Feb 2012).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Olds, T.; Maher, C.; Zumin, S.; Peneau, S.; Lioret, S.; Castetbon, K.; Bellisle; De Wilde, J.; Hohepa, M.; Maddison, R.; et al. Evidence that the prevalence of childhood overweight is plateauing: Data from nine countries. Int. J. Pediatr. Obes. 2011, 6, 342–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Cai, W. Nutritional challenges for children in societies in transition. Curr. Opin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2014, 17, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ministerio de Salud & Ministerio de Educación Pública. Informe Ejecutivo Censo Escolar Peso/Talla. 2016. Available online: https://www.mep.go.cr/sites/default/files/page/adjuntos/informe-ejecutivo-censo-escolar-peso-cortofinal.pdf (accessed on 13 March 2019).
  4. Bustos, N.; Kain, J.; Leyton, B.; Voi, F. Cambios en el patrón de consumo de alimentos en escolares chilenos con la implementación de un kiosco saludable. Arch. Latinoam. Nutr. 2011, 61, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Becker, M.W.; Bello, N.M.; Sundar, R.P.; Peltier, C.; Bix, L. Front-of-pack labels enhance attention to nutrition information in novel and commercial brands. Food Policy 2015, 56, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Swinburn, B.A.; Sacks, G.; Hall, K.D.; McPherson, K.; Finegood, D.T.; Moodie, M.L.; Gortmaker, S.L. The global obesity pandemic: Shaped by global drivers and local environments. Lancet 2011, 378, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Blaine, R.E.; Kachurak, A.; Davison, K.K.; Klabunde, R.; Fisher, J.O. Food parenting and child snacking: A systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017, 14, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Dunford, E.K.; Popkin, B.M. 37 years snacking trends for US children 1977–2014. Pediatr. Obes. 2017, 13, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Piernas, C.; Popkin, B.M. Trends in Snacking Among, U.S. Children. Health Affairs 2010, 29, 398–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ocampo, P.R.; Prada, G.E.; Herrán, O.F. Patrones de consumo alimentario y exceso de peso infantil; encuesta de la situación nutricional en Colombia, 2010. Rev. Chil. Nutr. 2014, 41, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Medina, R.; Moreno, V.; Romero, E. Comparación del consumo de alimentos durante el horario escolar en niños de 6 a 11 años de edad con sobrepeso u obesidad y con peso saludable. Rev. Salud Pública Nutr. 2012, 13. [Google Scholar]
  12. Monteiro, C.A.; Levy, R.B.; Claro, R.M.; De Castro, I.R.R.; Cannon, G. A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing. Cadernos Saúde Pública 2010, 26, 2039–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pan American Health Organization. Ultra-Processed Food and Drink Products in Latin America: Trends, Impact on Obesity, Policy Implications; PAHO: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pan American Health Organization. Modelo de Perfil de Nutrients de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud; PAHO: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  15. Castañeda-Castaneira, E.; Ortiz-Perez, H.; Robles-Pinto, G.; Molina-Frechero, N. Consumo de alimentos chatarra y estado nutricio en escolares de la Ciudad de México. Rev. Mex. Pediatr. 2016, 83, 15–19. [Google Scholar]
  16. Malik, V.S.; Pan, A.; Willett, W.C.; Hu, F.B. Sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2013, 98, 1084–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lado, N.; Martos, M.; Martinez, E. The power of a package. Product claims drive purchase decisions. J. Advert. Res. 2012, 52, 364–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abrams, K.M.; Evans, C.; Duff, B.R. Ignorance is bliss. How parents of preschool children make sense of front-of-package visuals and claims on food. Appetite 2014, 87, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Kleef, E.F.; Dagevos, H. The growing role of front-of-pack nutrition profile labelling. A consumer perspective on key issues and controversies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 55, 291–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lapierre, M.A.; Vaala, S.E.; Linebarger, D.L. Influence of licensed spokescharacters and health cues on children’s ratings of cereal taste. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2011, 165, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. INSP; UNICEF. Review of Current Labelling Regulations and Practices for Food and Beverage Targeting Children and Adolescents in Latin America Countries (Mexico, Chile, Costa Rica and Argentina) and Recommendations for Facilitating Consumer Information. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/ecuador/english/20161122_UNICEF_LACRO_Labeling_Report_LR(3).pdf (accessed on 3 April 2017).
  22. Kaur, A.; Scarborough, P.; Rayner, M. A systematic review, and meta-analyses, of the impact of health-related claims on dietary choices. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2017, 14, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Roberto, C.A.; Baik, J.; Harris, J.L.; Brownell, K.D. Influence of Licensed Characters on Children’s Taste and Snack Preferences. Pediatrics 2016, 126, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Arrúa, A.; Vidal, L.; Antúnez, L.; Machin, L.; Martinez, J.; Curutchet, M.R.; Gimenez, A.; Ares, G. Influence of Label Design on Children’s Perception of 2 Snack Foods. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2016, 10, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kraak, V.I.; Story, M. Influence of food companies ‘brand mascots and entertainment companies’ cartoon media characters on children’s diet and health: A systematic review and research needs. Obes. Rev. 2015, 15, 107–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zamora, I.; Jensen, M.; Vandevijvere, S.; Ramírez-Zea, M.; Kroker-Lobos, M.F. Television food and beverage marketing to children in Costa Rica: Current state and policy implications. Public Health Nutr. 2019, 22, 2509–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Dixon, H.; Scully, M.; Niven, P.; Kelly, B.; Chapman, K.; Donovan, R.; Martin, J.; Baur, L.A.; Crawford, D.; Wakefiels, M. Effects of nutrient content claims, sports celebrity endorsements and premium offers on pre-adolescent children’s food preferences. Pediatr. Obes. 2013, 9, 47–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rodríguez, L.; Pizarro, T. Ley de Etiquetado y Publicidad de Alimentos: Chile innovando en nutrición pública una vez más. Rev. Chil. Pediatr. 2018, 89, 579–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Sistema Costarricense de Información Jurídica. Decreto 37280. Resolución N 280-2012 (COMIECO-LXII) de Fecha 14 de Mayo de 2012 y su Anexo: Reglamento Técnico Centroamericano RTCA 67.01.07:10 Etiquetado General de los Alimentos Previamente Envasados” (Preenvasados). Available online: http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=53829&nValor3=90443&strTipM=TC (accessed on 22 October 2018).
  30. Sistema Costarricense de Información Jurídica. Decreto Ejecutivo 37100. Resolución N 277-2011 (COMIECO-LXI) de Fecha 2 de Diciembre de 2011. Reglamento Técnico Centroamericano RTCA 67.01.60:10 Etiquetado Nutricional de Productos Alimenticios Preenvasados para Consumo Humano para la Población a partir de los 3 años de Edad. Available online: http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=72456&nValor3=99677&param2=1&strTipM=TC&lResultado=3&strSim=simp (accessed on 1 October 2019).
  31. CODEX Alimentarius. Guidelines for Use of Nutrition and Health Claims (CAC/GL 23-1997). Available online: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/es/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXG%2B1-1979%252FCXG_001s.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2019).
  32. Dichter & Neira. Los Shoppers y Su Interacción Con el Canal. 2016. Available online: http://www.dichter-neira.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/DN_Insider-Compras_2016-VF-Mayo-2.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2018).
  33. Diario Oficial La Gaceta N 49 del 11 de Marzo del 2013. Declaratoria de Interés Público y Nacional-El Programa Para Reducir el Consumo de Sal/Sodio en Costa Rica. Decreto DM-MG-1083-2013. 2013. Available online: https://www.imprentanacional.go.cr/pub/2014/03/11/COMP_11_03_2014.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2018).
  34. Blanco-Metzler, A. Project IDRC 106 888 Implementation of a Population-Wide Program to Reduce Salt/Sodium Consumption in Costa Rica. (2012–2016). Available online: https://www.idrc.ca/en/project/implementation-population-wide-program-reduce-salt-and-sodium-consumption-costa-rica (accessed on 1 November 2018).
  35. Skaczkowski, G.; Durkin, S.; Kashima, Y.; Wakefield, M. The effect of packaging, branding and labeling on the experience of unhealthy food and drink: A review. Appetite 2016, 99, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pan American Health Organization; World Health Organization. Plan de Acción Para la Prevención de la Obesidad en la Niñez y la Adolescencia; PAHO: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; Available online: https://www.paho.org/hq/dmdocuments/2015/Obesity-Plan-Of-Action-Child-Spa-2015.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2018).
  37. Juul, F.; Hemmingsson, E. Trends in consumption of ultra-processed foods and obesity in Sweden between 1960 and 2010. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 3096–3107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. INFORMAS. Monitoring health-related labelling and promotional characters/premium offers on packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverage in retail outlets. Obes. Rev. 2015, 14, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lapierre, M.A.; Brown, A.M.; Houtzer, H.V.; Thomas, T.J. Child-directed and nutrition-focused marketing cues on food packaging: Links to nutritional content. Public Health Nutr. 2016, 20, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Pulker, C.E.; Scott, J.A.; Pollard, C.M. Ultra-processed family foods in Australia: Nutrition claims, health claims and marketing techniques. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Franco-Arellano, B.; Kim, M.A.; Vandevijvere, S.; Bernstein, J.T.; Labonté, M.-È.; Mulligan, C.; L’Abbé, M.R. Assessment of Packaged Foods and Beverages Carrying Nutrition Marketing against Canada’s Food Guide Recommendations. Nutrients 2019, 11, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Al-Ani, H.H.; Devi, A.; Eyles, H.; Swinburn, B.; Vandevijvere, S. Nutrition and health claims on healthy and less-healthy packaged food products in New Zealand. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 116, 1087–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Kaur, A.; Scarborough, P.; Matthews, A.; Payne, S.; Mizdrak, A.; Rayner, M. How many foods in the UK carry health and nutrition claims, and are they healthier than those that do not? Public Health Nutr. 2015, 19, 988–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Brecher, S.J.; Bender, M.M.; Wilkening, V.L.; McCabe, N.M.; Anderson, E.M. Status of nutrition labeling, health claims, and nutrient content claims for processed foods: 1997 food label and package survey. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2010, 100, 1057–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rodrigues, V.M.; Rayner, M.; Fernandes, A.C.; De Oliveira, R.C.; Proença, R.P.D.C.; Fiates, G.M.R. Comparison of the nutritional content of products, with and without nutrient claims, targeted at children in Brazil. Br. J. Nutr. 2016, 115, 2047–2056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. World Cancer Research Fund; American Institute for Cancer Research. Continuous Update Project Report: Diet, Nutrition, Physical Activity and Stomach Cancer; World Cancer Research Fund: London, UK, 2016; Available online: wcrf.org/stomach-cancer-2016 (accessed on 24 October 2018).
  47. Skeaff, C.M.; Miller, J. Dietary Fat and Coronary Heart Disease: Summary of Evidence from Prospective Cohort and Randomised Controlled Trials. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2009, 55, 173–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mozaffarian, D.; Micha, R.; Wallace, S. Effects on coronary heart disease of increasing polyunsaturated fat in place of saturated fat: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS Med. 2010, 7, e1000252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Imamura, F.; Micha, R.; Wu, J.H.; Otto, M.C.D.O.; Otite, F.O.; Abioye, A.I.; Mozaffarian, D. Effects of Saturated Fat, Polyunsaturated Fat, Monounsaturated Fat, and Carbohydrate on Glucose-Insulin Homeostasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Feeding Trials. PLoS Med. 2016, 13, e1002087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Mozaffarian, D.; Fahimi, S.; Singh, G.M.; Micha, R.; Khatibzadeh, S.; Engell, R.E.; Lim, S.; Danaei, G.; Ezzati, M.; Powles, J. Global Sodium Consumption and Death from Cardiovascular Causes. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 624–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Blanco-Metzler, A.; Roselló, M.; Núñez, H.P. Situación basal de la Información Nutricional Declarada en las Etiquetas de los Alimentos Comercializados en Costa Rica. Available online: http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-06222011000100012&lng=es (accessed on 8 December 2018).
  52. Devi, A.; Eyles, H.; Rayner, M.; Ni Mhurchu, C.; Swinburn, B.; Lonsdale-Cooper, E.; Vandevijvere, S. Nutritional quality, labelling and promotion of breakfast cereals on the New Zealand market. Appetite 2014, 81, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Pan American Health Organization. Ecuador, Chile y Bolivia Defienden en la OPS el Etiquetado de Alimentos Procesados. 2016. Available online: http://www.paho.org/bol/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1925:etiqalimentosoct16&Itemid=488 (accessed on 8 December 2018).
  54. Food Agriculture Organization Uruguay. Luego del Etiquetado Frontal de Alimentos, Uruguay va Por Más. 2018. Available online: http://www.fao.org/uruguay/noticias/detail/en/c/1151702 (accessed on 10 December 2018).
  55. Pan American Health Organization Perú. Gobierno Peruano Publica Manual de Advertencias de Productos Procesados que Pone en Vigor Ley 30021. 2018. Available online: https://www.paho.org/per/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4049:gobierno-peruano-publica-manual-de-advertencias-de-productos-procesados-que-pone-en-vigor-ley-30021&Itemid=900 (accessed on 10 December 2018).
Nutrients 11 02738 g001 550
Figure 1. INFORMAS taxonomy for the classification of nutrition and health claims [38].
Figure 1. INFORMAS taxonomy for the classification of nutrition and health claims [38].
Nutrients 11 02738 g001
Nutrients 11 02738 g002 550
Figure 2. Overall proportion of ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, according to the INFORMAS food categories classification (34), Costa Rica 2015 (n = 2402).
Figure 2. Overall proportion of ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, according to the INFORMAS food categories classification (34), Costa Rica 2015 (n = 2402).
Nutrients 11 02738 g002
Nutrients 11 02738 g003 550
Figure 3. Percentage of different types of nutrition and health claims by food category included in FoP of ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, Costa Rica 2015.
Figure 3. Percentage of different types of nutrition and health claims by food category included in FoP of ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, Costa Rica 2015.
Nutrients 11 02738 g003
Table
Table 1. Proportion of declared and content of critical nutrients a,b in ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, Costa Rica 2015 (per 100 g/mL).
Table 1. Proportion of declared and content of critical nutrients a,b in ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, Costa Rica 2015 (per 100 g/mL).
Food Categories cEnergyTotal FatSaturated FatTrans FatTotal Free SugarSodium
n (%)(kcal)n (%)(g)n (%)(g)n (%)(g)n (%)(g)n (%)(mg)
Confectionery458 (94)400 (337.0–506.9)451 (92)6.2 (0.0–27.8)363 (74)8.3 (0.0–16.3)206 (42)0 (0.0–0.0)446 (91)53.2 (39.0–61.2)444 (91)50 (0.0–100.0)
Cakes, sweet biscuits and pastries493 (78)440 (382.4–492.5)493 (78)16.7 (10.2–22.2)475 (75)6.5 (3.6–10.0)474 (75)0 (0.0–0.0)458 (72)25.9 (11.1–35.0)486 (77)333 (214.3–608.7)
Breakfast cereals151 (98)387 (366.7–400.0)151 (99)6.1 (3.3–9.1)145 (94)1.1 (0.0–3.0)139 (90)0 (0.0–0.0)142 (92)28.8 (16.7–34.3)148 (96)367 (126.8–486.8)
Drinking milk products87 (100)61 (52.9–66.7)87 (100)1.8 (1.3–2.4)78 (90)0.7 (0.2–1.0))42 (48)0 (0.0–0.0)72 (83)5.5 (4.0–8.3)81 (93)43 (35.4–66.7)
Savory Snacks290 (94)500 (461.0–535.7)290 (94)26.0 (20.0–32.1)274 (89)8.4 (4.0–12.0)264 (85)0 (0.0–0.0)206 (67)0.1 (0.0–3.6)283 (92)571 (321.4–815.8)
Beverages with sugar593 (93)39 (23.5–50.0)589 (93)0 (0.0–0.0)573 (90)0 (0.0–0.0)569 (89)0 (0.0–0.0)512 (81)7.8 (4.9–11.6)548 (86)8 (3.0–15.3)
Beverages without added sugar94 (100)2 (0.0–11.2)94 (100)0 (0.0–0.0)88 (94)0 (0.0–0.0)87 (93)0 (0.0–0.0)72 (77)0 (0.0–1.6)85 (90)10 (4.4–14.6)
Al food categories2166 (90)366.7 (46.0–468.7)2155 (90)3.7 (0.0–21.0)1996 (83)1.0 (0.0–8.3)1781 (74)0 (0.0–0.0)1908 (79)11.6 (3.6–37.2)2075 (86)70 (8.8–354.2)
a IQR: interquartile range, b Data expressed in median and 25th–75th percentile. c INFORMAS food categories classification.
Table
Table 2. Proportion of products included claims and marketing strategies on the front of package of ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, Costa Rica 2015.
Table 2. Proportion of products included claims and marketing strategies on the front of package of ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, Costa Rica 2015.
Food Categoriesb aFront of Pack with at Least One
Nutrition Claim
n (%)		Health Claim
n (%)		Nutrition or Health Claim
n (%)		Promotional Characters
n (%)		Premium Offers
n (%)		Promotional Characters or Premium Offers
n (%)
Confectionery (n = 488)119 (24)12 (2) A119 (24)100 (20) A12 (2) A107 (22) A
Cakes, sweet biscuits and pastries (n = 634)80 (13)17 (3) A83 (13)89 (14) A,B27 (4) A114 (18) A,B
Breakfast cereals (n = 154)131 (85) A30 (19) B131 (85) A73 (47) C25 (16)85 (55) C
Drinking milk products (n = 87)81 (93) A46 (53)85 (98) B 22 (25) A,D,E3 (3) A23 (26) A,D
Savoury snacks (n = 309)142 (46)42 (14) B148 (48)134 (43) C,D8 (3) A136 (44) C,D
Drinks with added sugar (n = 636)402 (63)74 (12) B427 (67)67 (11) B,E,F11 (2) A74 (12) B
Drinks without added sugar (n = 94)87 (93) A6 (6) A,B87 (93) A,B3 (3) F0 B3 (3)
Total of products (2402)1042 (43)227 (9)1080 (45)488 (20)86 (4)542 (23)
a INFORMAS food categories classification. A, B, C, D, E, F Percentages with the same superscript letters weren’t significantly different between the column percentages, based on Marascuillo procedure.
Table
Table 3. Energy and critical nutrient content a in 100 g of product with and without claims and marketing strategies on the front of the package of ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, Costa Rica 2015.
Table 3. Energy and critical nutrient content a in 100 g of product with and without claims and marketing strategies on the front of the package of ultra-processed food products commonly consumed as a snack by children and adolescents, Costa Rica 2015.
Nutrients bFront of Pack with at Least One
Nutrition Claim Health ClaimNutrition or Health ClaimPromotional CharactersPremium OffersPromotional Characters or Premium Offers
YesNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYesNoYesNo
Energy60.0 (24.4–396.3) *427.0 (333.3–500.0)65.2 (48.0–400.0) *372.1 (45.8–475.0)60.0 (24.4–394.5) *431.9 (340.0–500.0)380.0 (318.0–500.0) *355.0 (40.0–466.7)372.0 (347.8–406.2)366.7 (45.1–470.0)380.0 (326.7–480.2) *352.9 (39.8–466.7)
Total fat0.0 (0.0–8.7) *14.5 (0.0–25.0)1.8 (0.0–7.8) *5.0 (0.0–21.6)0.0 (0.0–8.0) *15.0 (0.0–25.07.5 (0.0–25.0) *2.6 (0.0–20.0)4.0 (1.0–9.7)3.8 (0.0–21.4)7.0 (0.1–24.0) *2.0 (0.0–20.1)
Satured fat0.0 (0.0–2.0) *5.4 (0.0–10.9)0.3 (0.0–2.0) *1.5 (0.0–8.9)0.0 (0.0–2.0) *5.7 (0.0–11.1)3.3 (0.0–9.2) *0.4 (0.0–7.91.2 (0.0–2.7)1.0 (0.0–8.4)2.3 (0.0–9.0) *0.0 (0.3–8.0)
Free Sugars6.5 (1.8–14.2) *28.6 (7.7–50.0)5.8 (2.4–13.3) *12.5 (3.6–39.8)6.6 (1.9–14.0) *30.0 (7.9–50.0)16.6 (3.9–40.6) *10.7 (3.3–33.7)30.0 (6.7–41.9) *11.2 (3.5–35.0)16.7 (4.2–41.9) *10.4 (3.0–33.3)
Sodium25 (5.2–271.4) *138.9 (22.0–420.0)45.8 (8.8–219.0) *76.5 (8.8–375.0)25.0 (5.5–260) *150.0 (25.0–423.1)222.5 (32.0–507.1) *51.0 (7.1–308.4)383.3 (120.0–666.7) *66.7 (8.3–333.3)265.5 (35.8–533.3) *47.9 (6.7–284.3)
a Data expressed in median and 25th–75th percentile. b A Man Whitney test (95%CI) was used to determine differences in nutritional content between products without claims and marketing strategies. * p < 0.05.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gamboa-Gamboa, T.; Blanco-Metzler, A.; Vandevijvere, S.; Ramirez-Zea, M.; Kroker-Lobos, M.F. Nutritional Content According to the Presence of Front of Package Marketing Strategies: The Case of Ultra-Processed Snack Food Products Purchased in Costa Rica. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112738

AMA Style

Gamboa-Gamboa T, Blanco-Metzler A, Vandevijvere S, Ramirez-Zea M, Kroker-Lobos MF. Nutritional Content According to the Presence of Front of Package Marketing Strategies: The Case of Ultra-Processed Snack Food Products Purchased in Costa Rica. Nutrients. 2019; 11(11):2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112738

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gamboa-Gamboa, Tatiana, Adriana Blanco-Metzler, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Manuel Ramirez-Zea, and Maria F. Kroker-Lobos. 2019. "Nutritional Content According to the Presence of Front of Package Marketing Strategies: The Case of Ultra-Processed Snack Food Products Purchased in Costa Rica" Nutrients 11, no. 11: 2738. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11112738

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop