Skip to main content
Log in

A Contribution to Relationship Between Volumetric Joint Count (Jv) and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) in Three-Dimensional (3-D) Space

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Abbreviations

N :

Number of joint sets

i :

Joint set order number

S mi :

Average true spacing of the i-th joint set

λ mi :

1-D density of the i-th set along the average normal vector of the set

Lx, Ly, Lz :

Three perpendicular scanlines

Nx, Ny, Nz :

Number of joints intersecting the three perpendicular scanlines Lx, Ly, and Lz

S :

Mean joint spacing

N rl :

Random joint number along a scanline of 5 m

A :

Investigated area in m2

N ra :

Random joint number in the investigated location

λx, λy, λz :

1-D densities along the directions of the x, y, and z axes

E(·):

Expected value of the function within “()”

n i :

Unit upper normal vector of join

l :

A direction vector

RQD l :

RQD in the l direction

λ vi :

3-D densities of the joints from set i

V(·):

Variance of the function within “()”

K i :

Fisher constant of the i-th set joint

References

  • Azimian A (2016) A new method for improving the RQD determination of rock Core in borehole. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:1559–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baecher GB, Lanney NA, Einstein HH (1977) Statistical description of rock properties and sampling. In: The 18th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association, 5C1-1–5C1-8

  • Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterisation and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NR, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech Rock Eng 6(4):189–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1973) Engineering classification of rock masses. Trans S Afr Inst Civ Eng 15:335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieniawski ZT (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. Proceedings of the symposium on explorer for rock engineering, Johannesburg, 97–106

  • Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai M, Kaiser PK, Uno H, Tasaka Y, Minami M (2004) Estimation of rock mass strength and deformation modulus of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(1):3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Q, Yin T (2019) Should the use of rock quality designation be discontinued in the rock mass rating system? Rock Mech Rock Eng 52:1075–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CRSRI (Changjiang River Scientific Research Institute of Changjiang Water Resources Commission) (2015) GB/T 50218-2014 Standard for engineering classification of rock masses. China Planning Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deer DU, Hendron AJ, Patton FD, Cording EJ (1967) Design of surface and near-surface construction in rock. Failure and breakage of rock. In: Fairhurst C (ed) Society of mining engineers of AIME, New York, pp 237–302

  • Deere DU, Deere DW (1988) The rock quality designation (RQD) index in practice. Rock classification systems for engineering purposes, ASTM STP 984. In: Kirkaldie L (ed) American society for testing and materials, Philadelphia, pp 91–101

  • Delisio A, Zhao J (2014) A new model for TBM performance prediction in blocky rock conditions. Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 43:440–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates of rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Brown ET (2019) The Hoek-Brown failure criterion and GSI–2018 edition. J Rock Mech Geotechn Eng 11(3):445–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek-Brown criterion – 2002 edition. Proceedings of the 5th North American rock mechanics symposium and 17th tunnelling association of Canada conference. Toronto, Canada. University of Toronto, Toronto, pp 267–273

  • ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses. International society for rock mechanics, commission on standardization of laboratory and field tests. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15:319–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karzulovic A, Goodman RE (1985) Determination of principal joint frequencies. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22(6):471–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake PHSW, Wathugala DN, Stephansson O (1993) Joint network modelling with a validation exercise in Stripa mine, Sweden. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30(5):503–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos V, Carter TG (2018) Maintaining geological reality in application of GSI for design of engineering structures in rock. Eng Geol 239:282–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinos P, Hoek E (2000) GSI – a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength. In: Proceedings Geo Eng 2000, International conference on geotechnical and geological engineering, Technomic Publishing Co, Melbourne, pp 1422–1440

  • Palmström A (1974) Characterization of jointing density and the quality of rock masses. Internal report, A.B. Berdal, Norway, p 26 (in Norwegian)

  • Palmström A (1995) RMi-a rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes. Ph.D. Thesis, Oslo University, Norway

  • Palmström A (2000) Block size and block size distribution. In: Proc. Workshop on “Reliability of Classification Systems” in Connection with the GeoEng 2000 Conference, Melbourne, p 12 (on CD)

  • Palmström A (2005) Measurements of and correlations between block size and rock quality designation (RQD). Tunn Undergr Sp Tech 20(4):362–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD (1985) Hemispherical projection methods in rock mechanics. Allen & Unwin, Sydney

  • Priest SD (2004) Determination of discontinuity size distributions from scanline data. Rock Mech Rock Eng 37(5):347–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priest SD, Hudson JA (1976) Discontinuity spacings in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 13(5):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şen Z (1984) RQD models and fracture spacing. J Geotech Eng 110(2):203–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şen Z, Eissa EA (1991) Volumetric rock quality designation. J Geotech Eng 117(9):1331–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Ulusay R (1999) Modifications to the geological strength index (GSI) and their applicability to stability of slopes. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(6):743–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonmez H, Ulusay R (2002) A discussion on the Hoek-Brown failure criterion and suggested modifications to the criterion verified by slope stability case studies. Yerbilimleri 26:77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2005) Engineering properties of rocks. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Einstein HH (2000) Estimating the intensity of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37(5):819–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Deng J, Zhang G, Yang X (2015) Validation of Monte Carlo simulation for discontinuity locations in space. Comput Geotech 67:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Kulatilake PHSW, Shu B (2017a) Improved probabilistic kinematic analysis procedure based on finite size discontinuities and its application to a rock slope at open pit mine in US. Int J Geomech 17(2):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Zhao Y, Lü Q, Deng J, Chen R (2017b) Estimation of the three-dimensional density of discontinuity systems based on one-dimensional measurements. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 94:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng J, Yang X, Lü Q, Zhao Y, Deng J, Ding Z (2018) A new perspective for the directivity of Rock Quality Designation (RQD) and an anisotropy index of jointing degree for rock masses. Eng Geol 240:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1505005), the National Natural Science Foundation Projects (41972264, 41772322 and 41772287), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (017182419), and the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation Project (LY18E090002). The authors would also like to thank Professor Harun Sonmez and one other anonymous referee for reviewing the paper and providing some valuable suggestions and comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianfeng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, J., Wang, X., Lü, Q. et al. A Contribution to Relationship Between Volumetric Joint Count (Jv) and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) in Three-Dimensional (3-D) Space. Rock Mech Rock Eng 53, 1485–1494 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01986-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01986-3

Keywords

Navigation