Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correcting surface loading at the observation level: impact on global GNSS and VLBI station networks

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Time-dependent mass variations of the near-surface geophysical fluids in atmosphere, oceans and the continental hydrosphere lead to systematic and significant load-induced deformations of the Earth’s crust. The Earth System Modeling group of Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum (ESMGFZ) provides vertical and horizontal surface deformations based on numerical models of the global geophysical fluids in atmosphere, oceans and the continental hydrosphere with a spatial resolution of \(0.5^\circ \) and a temporal sampling of down to 3 h (Dill and Dobslaw in J Geophys Res 118(9):5008–5017, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50353). The assessment of conventionally—i.e. without consideration of non-tidal loading models—processed global GNSS datasets reveals that large parts of the residual station coordinates are indeed related to surface loading effects. Residuals explained by the models often have a pronounced annual component, but variability at other periodicities also contributes to generally high correlations for 7-day averages. More than 10 years of observations from about 400 GNSS and 33 VLBI stations were specifically reprocessed for this study to incorporate non-tidal loading correction models at the observation level. Comparisons with the corresponding conventional processing schemes indicate that the coordinate repeatabilities and residual annual amplitudes decrease by up to 13 mm and 7 mm, respectively, when ESMGFZ’s loading models are applied. In addition, the standard deviation of the daily estimated vertical coordinate is reduced by up to 6.8 mm. The network solutions also allow for an assessment of surface loading effects on GNSS satellite orbits, resulting in radial translations of up to 4 mm and Earth orientation parameters (EOP). In particular, the VLBI-based EOP estimates are critically susceptible to surface loading effects, with root-mean-squared differences reaching of up to 0.2 mas for polar motion, and 10 µs for UT1-UTC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability Statement

All GNSS and VLBI data are available at IGS and IVS data centers, respectively. The ESMGFZ loading models are available at http://isdc.gfz-potsdm.de/esmdata/loading.

Notes

  1. https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/nndc/struts/form?t=101650s=1d=1, accessed June 2019.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank IGS and IVS for making publicly available GNSS and VLBI observations. All geophysical loading models evaluated herein can be accessed at https://isdc.gfz-potsdam.de/esmdata/loading/. We would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for their assistance in evaluating this paper and their helpful recommendations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HD, BM, and SG defined the study. BM and KB processed the GNSS and VLBI data. All authors contributed to the analysis, interpretation, and discussion of the results. BM prepared the manuscript with major contributions from RD, HD, SG, and KB and inputs from all authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Männel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Männel, B., Dobslaw, H., Dill, R. et al. Correcting surface loading at the observation level: impact on global GNSS and VLBI station networks. J Geod 93, 2003–2017 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01298-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01298-y

Keywords

Navigation