Abstract
The EU, Japan, and the US now share many environmental norms, laws, and institutions and cooperate on international environmental matters through numerous bilateral and multilateral channels. They disagree, however, on how to deal with some of the most serious issues facing the global environment and the quality of human life including wide-scale biodiversity loss, climate change, the use of genetically modified (GM) organisms; the trans-boundary movement of hazardous wastes, and chemical safety. As these are all issues that require the involvement of developing countries if global environmental protection efforts are to be effective, the discord that exists among the Northern states is of tremendous significance. The US has pulled out of the Kyoto Protocol arguing that the treaty is poorly designed and would be detrimental to the US economy. Japan and the EU have had to try to find a way to bring the treaty into force without the participation of the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases and to convince participating countries to meet their targets even though this may put them at a competitive disadvantage. In the case of biodiversity loss, although the US initiated international negotiations on biodiversity preservation, it has refused to join the EU and Japan in ratifying the Convention on Biological Diversity. There are also differences between the US, on the one side, and Japan and the EU on the other, regarding the use of GM organisms. This article analyses the reasons for the differences that have emerged among northern states in their international environmental policy positions and what the implications of this northern policy divide are for the effectiveness and legitimacy of international environmental protection efforts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
14th Governing Council, United Nations Environment Programme, Rationalization of International Conventions on Biological Diversity, Decision 14/26, June 1987
Arata, E. (2004), ‚Japan’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions up 2% in ‘02; First Rise in Two Years’, Japan Times, May 19, 2004
T. Bernauer (2003) Genes, Trade, and Regulation: The Seeds of Conflict in Food Biotechnology Princeton University Press Princeton
A. Christiansen J. Wettestad (2003) ArticleTitle‘The EU as a Frontrunner on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading: How Did it Happen and Will the EU Succeed?’ Climate Policy 3 IssueID1 3–18 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1469-3062(02)00096-7
Clark, W. C. (2004), ‘A Global Environmental Divide?’ Environment 46(3), editorial
W.C. Clark N.M. Dickson (2001) ‘Civic Science: America’s Encounter with Global Environmental Risks?’ BibInstitutionalEditorNameSocial Learning Group (Eds) Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks Vol. 1. A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain, MIT Press Cambridge, MA 259–294
The Committee on the Environment and the Northeast International Committee on Energy of the Conference of New England Governors and Eastern Canadian Premiers, ‘New England Governors/Eastern Canadian Premiers Climate Change Action Plan 2001’, August 28, 2001
Davis, G. (2002), ‘California Takes on Air Pollution’, Washington Post, July 22, 2002, A 15
E. R. DeSombre (2005) ‘Understanding United States Unilateralism: Domestic Sources of U.S. International Environmental Policy’ R.S. Axelrod D.L. Downie N.J. Vig (Eds) The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy Congressional Quarterly Press Washington D.C. 181–199
Earth Negotiations Bulletin (1994), ‘A Brief History of the Convention on Biological Diversity’, ENB: 09:18, http://www.iisd.ca/vol09/09180001.html
European Community (2004), ‘Emissions Trading: Community Clears Over 5,000 Plants to Enter Emissions Market Next January’, IP/04/862, Brussels, 7 July 2004, http://europa.eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/04/861&format=HTML&aged= 0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
European Community. (2004), ‘Emissions Trading: Community Takes Legal Action to Speed Up Member States Preparations’, IP/04/861, Brussels, 7 July 2004, http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/climat/eccp.htm
European Environment Agency (2003), ‘Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends and Projections in Europe 2003’, January 2003, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Community, http://reports.eea.eu.int/environmental_issue_report_2003_36/en/tab_summary_RLR
European Environment Agency. 2004. The State of Biological Diversity in Europe, MALAHIDE/INF 2, (pp. 25–27), Stakeholders’ Conference, Biodiversity and the EU-Sustaining Life. Sustaining Livelihoods, Grand Hotel, Malahide, Ireland
European Parliament (2004), ‘Climate Change: EP Vote Paves the Way for Global Fight Against Climate Change’, IP/04/505, Brussels/Strasbourg 20 April 2004, http://europa. eu.int/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/04/505&format=HTML&aged=0& language=EN&guiLanguage=en
European Union Fact Sheet (2004), ‘EU-US Cooperation in the Development of the Hydrogen Economy’, June 2004, http://europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/us/sum06_04/fact/hydrogen.pdf
M. Faure J. Lefevere (2005) ‘Compliance with Global Environmental Policy’ R. S. Axelrod D. L. Downie N. J. Vig (Eds) The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy Congressional Quarterly Press Washington, D.C. 163–180
Fletcher, S. R. (1995), ‘Biological Diversity: Issues Related to the Biodiversity Convention’, Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, 95–598 ENR, May 15, 1995, http://www.ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/Biodiversity/biodv-2.cfm?&CFID=17320719& CFTOKEN=20693219
The Greens/EFA in the European Parliament (2004), ‘EU Again Leads the Way in Fight Against Greenhouse Gas Emissions’, Press Release, Strasbourg, April 20, 2004, http://www.eel.nl/legislation/presrel.pdf
P. Harris (Eds) (2000) Climate Change and American Foreign Policy St. Martin’s Press New York
J. Hovi T. S. Skodvin Andresen (2003) ArticleTitle‘The Persistence of the Kyoto Protocol: Why Other Annex I Countries Move on Without the United States’ Global Environmental Politics 3 IssueID4 1–23 Occurrence Handle10.1162/152638003322757907
M. Huber A. Liberatore (2001) ‘Regional Approaches to the Management of Global Environmental Risks: The Case of the European Union’ in Social Learning Group, ed., Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks Vol. 1 – A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain MIT Press Cambridge, MA 295–322
H. K. Jacobson (2002) ‘Climate Change, Unilateralism, Realism, and Two-Level Games’ S. Forman S. Patrick (Eds) Multilateralism and U.S. Foreign Policy: Ambivalent Engagement Lynne Rienner Boulder, CO 415–436
The Japan Times (2004), ‘Japan, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trade Market Set for 2005’, August 4
Y. Kameyama (2003) ‘Climate Change as Japanese Foreign Policy: From Reactive to Proactive’ P.G. Harris (Eds) Global Warming and East Asia Routledge London 135–151
J. Kauffman (1997) ‘Domestic and International Linkages in Global Environmental Politics: A Case Study of the Montreal Protocol’ M. A. Schreurs E. Economy (Eds) The Internationalization of Environmental Protection Cambridge University Press Cambridge 74–96
Keidanren (2003), ‘Results of the Fiscal 2003 Follow-Up to the Keidanren Voluntary Action Plan in the Environment-Section on Global Warming Measures’, November 21, 2003, http://www.keidanren.or.jp/english/policy/2003/113/report.pdf
Keilbach, P. ‘TransAtlantic Food Fights in an Era of Globalization: Impacts on Democracy, Equity, Sovereignty and Sustainability’, in M. Schreurs, H. Selin, and Stacy VanDeveer, eds., Enlarging TransAtlantic Relations: Environment, Agriculture, and Trade Politics across the Atlantic (manuscript)
K. T. Litfin (1994) Ozone Discourse Columbia University Press New York
Marland, G., T. A. Boden and R. J. Andres (2003), ‘Global, Regional and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions’,http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/trends/emis/em_cont.htm
Ministry of Environment, Japan (2003), ‘Feasibility Studies on Climate Change Mitigation Projects for Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Implementation in 2003’, http://www.env.go.jp/en/topic/cc/030828.pdf
Mossinghoff, G. J. (1998), ‘The Biodiversity Convention and Intellectual Property Rights: Conflict or Harmony? Presentation made at the 37th World Congress of the International Association for the Protection of Industry Property’, Rio de Janeiro, May 28, 1998,http://www.oblon.com/Ip/display.php?biodiversityconvention.html
Myers, S. L. (2004), ‘Russian Legislators Vote to Ratify Kyoto Protocol’, New York Times, October 22, 2004
National Energy Policy Development Group (2001), ‘Reliable, Affordable, and Environmentally Sound Energy for America’s Future’, May 2001
New Rules Project, Democratic Energy: Communities and Government working on our Energy Future, “Automobile Greenhouse Gas Emissions-California”,http://www.newrules.org/environment/climateca.html
The New York Times (2001). ‘In President‘s words: “A Leadership Role on the Issue of Climate change”, June 12, p.12
Natural Resources Defense Council, (2001), ‘Second Analysis Confirms Greenhouse Gas Reductions in China’, October 2001, http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/achinagg.asp
Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, (2003), ‘U.S.-EU Summit: Cooperation on the Development of a Hydrogen Fuel Economy’, June 25, 2003,http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/fs/21929.htm
E. A. Parson (2003) Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy Oxford University Press Oxford
Pew Center on Global Climate Change (2002), ‘Climate Change Activities in the United States’, June 2002
B. G. Rabe (2004) Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C.
K. Raustiala (1997) ArticleTitle‘Domestic Institutions and International Regulatory Cooperation: Comparative Responses to the Convention on Biological Diversity’ World Politics 49 IssueID4 482–509
Schaper, M. (2004), ‘The U.S., Europe, and National Interest: Environmental Standard-Setting When Trade Interests Collide’, in M. Schreurs, H. Selin, and S. VanDeveer, eds., Enlarging TransAtlantic Relations: Environment, Agriculture, and Trade Politics across the Atlantic (Manuscript)
M. A. Schreurs (2002) Environmental Politics in Japan, Germany, and the United States Cambridge University Press Cambridge
United Nations Development Programme, Millenium Development Goals, 2002, http://www.undp.org/mdg/abcs.html
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, FCCC/SAI/2001. Synthesis and Assessment Report of the Greenhouse Gas Inventories Submitted in 2001, http://unfccc.int/programs/mis/ghg/sai2001.pdf
U.S. Department of State (2002), ‘U.S. Climate Action Report: Third National Communication of the United States of America Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’, Washington, D.C., May. http://Yosemite.epa.gov/oar/globalwarming. nsf/UniqueKeyLookup/SHSU5BULRY/$File/front.pdf
N. J. Vig M. G. Faure (2004) Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union MIT Press Cambridge
R. T. Watson (Eds) (2002) Climate Change, 2001: Sythesis Report: Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Cambridge University Press Cambridge
J. Wettestad (2005) ArticleTitleThe Making of the 2003 EU Emissions Trading Directive: An Ultra-Quick Process due to Entrepreneurial Efficiency?’ Global Environmental Politics 5 IssueID1 1–23 Occurrence Handle10.1162/1526380053243477
InstitutionalAuthorNameThe White House (2002) Economic Report of the President United States Government Printing Office Washington, D.C.
The White House (2003), ‘Fact Sheet: Hydrogen Fuel: A Clean and Secure Energy Future’, February 6, 2003, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-25.html
The White House (2003), ‘Hydrogen Fuel: A Clean and Secure Energy Future’, January 28, 2003, http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-25.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schreurs, M.A. Global Environment Threats and a Divided Northern Community. Int Environ Agreements 5, 349–376 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-3809-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-005-3809-4