Skip to main content
Log in

Joint implementation under asymmetric information and strategic behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Joint Implementation (JI) under the Framework Convention on Climate Change means that countries could partly offset their national abatement commitments by investing in CO2 abatement projects abroad. JI is introduced as a mechanism for achieving a certain global abatement target less costly by separating the commitments from the implementation of measures. This paper studies the design of a JI contract when the investor has incomplete information about the foreign firm which carries out the JI project (the host). Asymmetric information leads to a decrease in the potential cost savings from JI. Furthermore, private information held by the potential host firm could give the firm a significant positive utility of participating in JI projects. The possibility of being a host for a JI project in the future can prevent potential host firms from investing in profitable abatement projects today. The paper analyzes the impact on emissions of CO2 of strategic behavior among potential hosts for JI projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, S. (1992), ‘Reaching a CO2-Emission Limitation Agreement for the Community: Implications for Equity and Cost-Effectiveness’, European Economy, 3–24.

  • Barrett, S. (1993a), ‘Joint Implementation for Achieving National Abatement Commitments in the Framework Convention on Climate Change’, OECD, Group on Economic and Environment Policy Integration, Mimeo, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1993b), ‘A Strategic analysis of “Joint Implementation” Mechanisms in the Framework Convention on Climate Change”, Paper to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development in Geneva, London Business School and Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, London.

  • Burniaux, J.-M., J. P. Martin, G. Nicoletti and J. O. Martins (1992), ‘The Cost of Reducing CO2 Emission: Evidence from GREEN’, Economics Department Working Paper 115, OECD.

  • Bohm, P. (1994), ‘On the Feasibility of Joint Implementation of Carbon Emission Reductions’, Research Papers in Economics 2, Department of Economics, University of Stockholm.

  • Hanisch, T. (1991), ‘Joint Implementation of Commitments to Curb Climate Change’, CICERO Policy Note No. 2, University of Oslo.

  • Laffont, J-J. and J. Tirole (1993), A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation, The MIT Press.

  • Mintzer, I. (1994), ‘Institutional Options and Operational Challenges in the Management of a Joint Implementation Regime’, in K. Ramakrishna, ed., Criteria for Joint Implementation under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, Woods Hole, MA.: Woods Hole Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira-Martins, J., J-M. Burniaux and J. P. Martin (1992), ‘Trade and the Effectiveness of Unilateral CO2-abatement Policies: Evidence From GREEN’, OECD Economic Studies 19, 123–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selrod, R. and A. Torvanger (1994), ‘What Might be Minimum Requirements for Making the Mechanism of Joint Implementation under the Climate Convention Credible and Operational’, in Prodipto, Ghosh and Jyotsna, Puri, eds., Joint Implementation of Climate Change Commitments-Opportunities and Apprehensions, New Delhi: Tata Energy Research Institute and Oslo: CICERO Report No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torvanger, A., J. S. Fuglestvedt, C. Hagem, L. Ringius, R. Selrod and H. A. Aaheim (1994), ‘Joint Implementation Under the Climate Convention: Phases, Options and Incentives’, CICERO Report No. 6, University of Oslo.

  • Pezzey, J. (1992), ‘Analysis of Unilateral CO2 Control in the European Community and OECD’, The Energy Journal 13, 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, J. and R. Wigle (1991), ‘The International Incidence of Carbon Taxes’, in R. Dornbusch and J. M. Poterba, eds., Global Warning: Economic Policy Responses, MIT Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hagem, C. Joint implementation under asymmetric information and strategic behavior. Environmental and Resource Economics 8, 431–447 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357412

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357412

Key words

Navigation