Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring of seismic events from a specific source region using a single regional array: A case study

  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the monitoring of earthquakes and nuclear explosions using a sparse worldwide network of seismic stations, it is frequently necessary to make reliable location estimates using a single seismic array. It is also desirable to screen out routine industrial explosions automatically in order that analyst resources are not wasted upon detections which can, with a high level of confidence, be associated with such a source. The Kovdor mine on the Kola Peninsula of NW Russia is the site of frequent industrial blasts which are well recorded by the ARCES regional seismic array at a distance of approximately 300 km. We describe here an automatic procedure for identifying signals which are likely to result from blasts at the Kovdor mine and, wherever possible, for obtaining single array locations for such events. Carefully calibrated processing parameters were chosen using measurements from confirmed events at the mine over a one-year period for which the operators supplied Ground Truth information. Phase arrival times are estimated using an autoregressive method and slowness and azimuth are estimated using broadband f{-}k analysis in fixed frequency bands and time-windows fixed relative to the initial P-onset time. We demonstrate the improvement to slowness estimates resulting from the use of fixed frequency bands. Events can be located using a single array if, in addition to the P-phase, at least one secondary phase is found with both an acceptable slowness estimate and valid onset-time estimate. We evaluate the on-line system over a twelve month period; every event known to have occured at the mine is detected by the process and 32 out of 53 confirmed events were located automatically. The remaining events were classified as “very likely” Kovdor events and were subsequently located by an analyst. The false alarm rate is low; only 84 very likely Kovdor events were identified during the whole of 2003 and none of these were subsequently located at a large distance from the mine. The location accuracy achieved automatically by the single-array process is remarkably good, and is comparable to that obtained interactively by an experienced analyst using two-array observations. The greatest problem encountered in the single array location procedure is the difficulty in determining arrival times for secondary phases, given the weak Sn phase and the complexity of the P-coda. The method described here could be applied to a wide range of locations and sources for which the monitoring of seismic activity is desirable. The effectiveness will depend upon the distance between source and receiver, the nature of the seismic sources and the level of regional seismicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike, H., 1973, Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle, In: B. Petrov and F. Csaki (eds.): Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest Akademiai Kiado. pp. 267–281.

  • Astiz, L. and Shearer P.M., 2001, Earthquake locations in the inner continental Borderland, offshore Southern California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 90, 425–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bame, D.A., Walck, M.C. and Hiebert-Dodd, K.L., 1990, Azimuth estimation capabilities of the NORESS regional seismic array, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 1999–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J.L., Pearson, D.C. and Blomberg, W.S., 2003, Azimuthal variation of short-period rayleigh waves from cast blasts in Northern Arizona, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 93, 724–736.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capon, J., 1969, High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis, Proc. IEEE 57, 1408–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D., Kelly, D.J. and Filson, J.R., 1971, The VESPA process for the analysis of seismic signals, Nature 232, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • GSE/JAPAN/40, 1992, A fully automated method for determining the arrival times of seismic waves and its application to an on-line processing system, In: Proceedings 34th GSE session, Geneva, Italy, GSE/RF/62, G.S.E.

  • Harris, D.B., 1991, A waveform correlation method for identifying quarry explosions, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, 2395–2418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlin, M. A.H., Minster, J.B. and Orcutt, J.A., 1990, An automatic means to discriminate between earthquakes and quarry blasts, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 2143–2160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingate, S.F., Husebye, E.S. and Christoffersson, A., 1985, Regional arrays and optimum data processing schemes, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 75, 1155–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, B. L.N., 2002, The Seismic Wavefield. Volume II: Interpretation of Seismograms on Regional and Global Scales. Cambridge University Press.

  • Kremenetskaya, E., Asming, V. and Ringdal, F., 2001, Seismic location calibration of the European Arctic, Pure appl. geophys. 158, 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kushnir, A., Lapshin, V., Pinsky, V. and Fyen, J., 1990, Statistically optimal event detection using small array data, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 1934–1950.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kværna, T. and Doornbos, D.J. 1986, An integrated approach to slowness analysis with arrays and three-component stations, NORSAR Scientific Report: Semiannual Technical Summary No. 2-1985/1986, NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway. pp. 60–69.

  • Kværna, T. and Ringdal, F., 1986, Stability of various f-k estimation techniques, NORSAR Scientific Report: Semiannual Technical Summary No. 1-1986/1987, NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway. pp. 29–40.

  • Leonard, M. and Kennett, B.L.N., 1999, Multi-component autoregressive techniques for the analysis of seismograms, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 113, 247–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, K.L., Bonner, J.L. and Barker, T., 2004, Seismic source mechanisms for quarry blasts: Modelling observed Rayleigh and Love wave patterns from a Texas quarry, Geophys. J. Int. 156, 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mykkeltveit, S. and Bungum, H., 1984, Processing of regional seismic events using data from small-aperture arrays, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 74, 2313–2333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mykkeltveit, S. and Ringdal, F., 1981, Phase identification and event location at regional distances using small-aperture array data, In: E.S. Husebye and S. Mykkeltveit (eds.): Identification of seismic sources – Earthquake or underground explosions. pp. 467–481, Reidel Publishing Company.

  • Mykkeltveit, S., Ringdal, F., Kværna, T. and Alewine, R.W., 1990, Application of regional arrays in seismic verification research, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 80, 1777–1800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara, H., 2004, Correlation distance of waveforms for closely located events – I. Implications of the heterogeneous structure around the source region of the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu, Japan, earthquake (M W =6.9), Geophys. J. Int. 157, 1255–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringdal, F. and Kværna, T., 1989, A multi-channel processing approach to real time network detection, phase association, and threshold monitoring, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 79, 1927–1940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivière-Barbier, F. and Grant, L.T., 1993, Identification and Location of Closely Spaced Mining Events, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 83, 1527–1546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaff, D.P. and Richards, P.G., 2004, Lg-wave cross correlation and double-difference location: Application to the 1999 Xiuyan, China, Sequence, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 94, 867–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schisselé, E., Guilbert, J., Gaffet, S. and Cansi, Y., 2004, Accurate time-frequency-wavenumber analysis to study coda waves, Geophys. J. Int. 158, 577–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, R.O., 1986, Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation, IEEE Trans. Antennas and Propagation 34, 276–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, J., 2001a, HYPOSAT – An enhanced routine to locate seismic events, Pure Appl. Geophys. 158, 277–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, J., 2001b, Slowness corrections – one way to improve IDC products Pure Appl. Geophys. 158, 375–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, J. and Kennett, B.L.N., 2002, Comparison of location procedures – The Kara Sea event of 16 August 1997., NORSAR scientific report: Semiannual technical summary no. 1-2002, NORSAR, Kjeller, Norway. pp. 97–103.

  • Shearer, P.M., 1997, Improving local earthquake locations using the L1 norm and waveform cross correlation: Application to the Whittier Narrows, California, aftershock sequence, J. Geophys. Res. 102(B4), 8269–8283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, P.M., Hardebeck, J.L., Astiz, L. and Richards-Dinger, K.B., 2003, Analysis of similar event clusters in aftershocks of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake J. Geophys. Res. 108(B1). 2035, doi:10.1029/2001JB000685.

  • Smith, A.T., 1989, High-frequency seismic observations and models of chemical explosions: Implications for the discrimination of ripple-fired mining blasts, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 79, 1089–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storchak, D.A., Schweitzer, J. and Bormann, P. 2003, The IASPEI standard seismic phase list, Seismological Research Letters 74, 761–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Su, F., Aki, K. and Biswas, N.N., 1991, Discriminating quarry blasts from earthquakes using coda waves Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 81, 162–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, F., 2003, Kola peninsula: Minerals and mines, Geology Today 19, 206–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Gibbons.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibbons, S.J., Kværna, T. & Ringdal, F. Monitoring of seismic events from a specific source region using a single regional array: A case study. J Seismol 9, 277–294 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-005-5746-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-005-5746-7

Keywords

Navigation