Figure 1

The experimental ${}^2\mathrm{H}(e,e^{\text{'}}p)n$ cross section as a function of missing momentum measured at MAMI for $Q^2=0.33\hspace{0.5em}{(\mathrm{GeV}/c)}^2$[4] compared to calculations [7] with (solid curve) and without (dashed curve) meson exchange currents (MEC) and isobar currents (IC). Both calculations used the Paris potential and include FSI (N) and leading order relativistic corrections (R). The low $p_m$ data have been re-analyzed and used in this work to determine $f_{\mathit{LT}}$.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 2

The relation between missing momentum and the angle between the ejected proton and the momentum transfer in the center of mass for kinematics I–VIII. The red circles correspond to the spectrometer settings centered around $\varphi =0^{°}$ and the blue diamonds correspond to $\varphi ={180}^{°}$. All points within the kinematic acceptance of a single spectrometer setting are joined by a line.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 3

The ratio between the ${}^2\mathrm{H}$($e,e^{\text{'}2}\mathrm{H}$) elastic (coincidence) cross section from this experiment and the interpolated elastic (single arm) cross sections, measured at ALS in Saclay [21, 22]. This ratio has been used to normalize all coincidence cross sections.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 4

Cuts in $q_{\mathrm{lab}}$ and ω applied to the different kinematic settings [(a) I, (b) II, III, (c) IV see Table ]. The same cuts have been applied to the corresponding $\varphi ={180}^{°}$ settings.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 5

Comparison of the distribution of kinematic variables between the experiment and the Monte Carlo calculation for kinematic setting VIII: (a) momentum transfer, (b) energy transfer, (c) electron scattering angle, (d) missing momentum, (e) angle between the proton momentum and the momentum transfer, and (f) the angle between the reaction plane and the electron scattering plane. Note: ${\varphi }_{\mathit{pq}}={\varphi }_{\mathit{np}}^{\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{m}.}=\varphi$.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 6

Comparison of the distribution of $q_{\mathrm{lab}}$ and ω for kinematic setting II and VI (a,b) for setting III and VII (c,d) and for setting kinematic IV and VIII (e,f ). The (red) circles correspond to $\varphi \approx 0^{°}$ and the (blue) triangles correspond to $\varphi \approx {180}^{°}$.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 7

Averaged kinematic variables as a function of missing momentum: three-momentum transfer in the lab frame (a), energy transfer (b), electron scattering angle (c), proton angle with respect to the momentum transfer in the lab (d) and in the center of mass frame (e), total energy in the center of mass (f). The red circles correspond to $\varphi =0^{°}$ and the blue diamonds correspond to $\varphi ={180}^{°}$. Points that are joined by a line are part of the same spectrometer setting.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 8

Ratio between the averaged ${}^2\mathrm{H}(e,e^{\text{'}}p)n$ cross section for each missing momentum bin and the cross section calculated using the corresponding averaged kinematics. (a) Ratios for $\varphi =0^{°}$. (b) Ratios for $\varphi ={180}^{°}$. The full lines joining the solid symbols are calculated using the full theory while the dashed lines are calculated using PWIA. The ratios $f_{\mathrm{bc}}$ calculated with the full calculation are used to correct the experimental cross sections as described in the text.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 9

Ratio between the experimental values of the response function $f_{\mathit{LT}}$ determined using the full calculation for all corrections and using PWIA for the corrections. For comparison the error bars indicate the relative error in $f_{\mathit{LT}}$.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 10

(a) Experimental cross sections as a function of missing momentum; red circles correspond to the $\varphi =0^{°}$ settings and blue triangles correspond to the $\varphi ={180}^{°}$ kinematics. The lines represent theoretical calculations [7]; coupled channel calculation (CC, solid), PWBA (dotted), FSI and relativistic corrections (N+R, dash-dot) and FSI, MEC, IC and relativistic corrections (N+MEC+IC+R, dashed). (b) Ratio between experimental cross sections and calculation for $\varphi =0^{°}$. (c) Ratio between experimental cross sections and calculation for $\varphi ={180}^{°}$. The labeling of the calculations is the same as for the top panel.Reuse & Permissions

Figure 11

(a) Extracted interference response function $f_{\mathit{LT}}$ as a function of missing momentum. The smaller error bar represents the statistical error and the larger one includes the systematic uncertainty. As in Fig. 10 the lines represent the theoretical calculations. (b) Ratio between experimental values of $f_{\mathit{LT}}$ and calculations. The labeling of the calculations is the same as for (a).Reuse & Permissions

Figure 12

The asymmetry $A_{\mathit{LT}}$ compared to the calculation. The labeling of the curves is the same as in Figs. 10 and 11. Both the statistical and the total errors are indicated.Reuse & Permissions