Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Association Study and Pathway Analysis for Heterophil/Lymphocyte (H/L) Ratio in Chicken
Previous Article in Journal
PPARGC1A rs8192678 and NRF1 rs6949152 Polymorphisms Are Associated with Muscle Fiber Composition in Women
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle. Genes 2019, 10, 1019

1
Division of Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea
2
Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
3
Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
4
School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale 2351, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2020, 11(9), 1013; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091013
Submission received: 29 July 2020 / Revised: 26 August 2020 / Accepted: 26 August 2020 / Published: 27 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)
The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
In Equations (2) and (3), variable M is used for a matrix of centered genotypes but different variables (Z) are used in equation 4 and in some equations (points 1, 3 and 6) of the iterative steps in the algorithm of the WGBLUP approach for the same matrix. Thus, the authors would like to change the variable Z to M in Equation (4) as well as on the iterative steps in the algorithm of the WGBLUP approach. The correct expression for Equation (4) is given as
u ^ = D M   G 1 g ^ ,
For the iterative steps in the algorithm of the WGBLUP approach, the correct expressions are given as
1.
Set parameters to t = 1, D ( t ) = I , G ( t ) = MD ( t ) M λ , where λ = 1 i = 1 m 2 p i ( 1 p i ) ;
3.
Compute SNP effects as u ^ ( t ) = λ D ( t ) M G ( t ) 1 g ^ ;
6.
G ( t + 1 ) = MD ( t + 1 ) M λ was calculated;
Note that on the above steps, a Z (now M) variable for point 1 and a prime on the Z (now M) for points 3 and 6 were also missing on the original version. Likewise, a ^ g   was changed to g ^ in point 3.
The authors would like to apologize for any inconvenience caused. The changes do not affect the scientific results. The manuscript will be updated, and the original will remain online on the article webpage, with a reference to this correction.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lopez, B.I.; Lee, S.-H.; Park, J.-E.; Shin, D.-H.; Oh, J.-D.; de las Heras-Saldana, S.; van der Werf, J.; Chai, H.-H.; Park, W.; Lim, D. Weighted genomic best linear unbiased prediction for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle. Genes 2019, 10, 1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lopez, B.I.; Lee, S.-H.; Park, J.-E.; Shin, D.-H.; Oh, J.-D.; de las Heras-Saldana, S.; van der Werf, J.; Chai, H.-H.; Park, W.; Lim, D. Correction: Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle. Genes 2019, 10, 1019. Genes 2020, 11, 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091013

AMA Style

Lopez BI, Lee S-H, Park J-E, Shin D-H, Oh J-D, de las Heras-Saldana S, van der Werf J, Chai H-H, Park W, Lim D. Correction: Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle. Genes 2019, 10, 1019. Genes. 2020; 11(9):1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lopez, Bryan Irvine, Seung-Hwan Lee, Jong-Eun Park, Dong-Hyun Shin, Jae-Don Oh, Sara de las Heras-Saldana, Julius van der Werf, Han-Ha Chai, Woncheoul Park, and Dajeong Lim. 2020. "Correction: Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle. Genes 2019, 10, 1019" Genes 11, no. 9: 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes11091013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop