SFX by Ex Libris Inc.

Title:	Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors
Source:	Energy Policy [0301-4215] Rubashkina, Yana yr:2015

Basic

Sorry, no full text available...

Please use the document delivery service (see below)

Holding information

Holdings in library search engine ALBERT

Document delivery

Request document via Library/Bibliothek

Users interested in this article also expressed an interest in the following:
description	1.	Ramanathan, R. "Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: A revisit of the Porter hypothesis." Journal of cleaner production 155.Part 2 (2016): 79-92.
description	2.	Porter, Michael E., Michael E. "Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship." The journal of economic perspectives 9.4 (1995): 97-118.
description	3.	Kriechel, B. "The environmental Porter hypothesis: theory, evidence, and a model of timing of adoption." Economics of Innovation and New Technology 18.3 (2009): 267-294.
description	4.	Lanoie, P. "Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis." Journal of productivity analysis 30.2 (2008): 121-128.
description	5.	Ambec, S. "The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?" Review of environmental economics and policy 7.1 (2013): 2-22.
description	6.	"Business and Public Policy: The Adversaries." Harvard business review 57.6 (1979): 85-.
description	7.	Palmer, K. "Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?" The journal of economic perspectives 9.4 (1995): 119-132.
description	8.	Porter, E. "Green and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate." Harvard business review 73.5 (1995): 120-134.
description	9.	Lanoie, P. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis." Journal of economics & management strategy 20.3 (2011): 803-842.
description	10.	Etzioni, A. "The Capture Theory of Regulations--Revisited." Society 46.4 (2009): 319-323.
description	11.	PORTER, Michael E. "Towards a dynamic theory of strategy." Strategic management journal 12.WINTER (1991): 95-117.
description	12.	Horváthová, E. "The impact of environmental performance on firm performance: Short-term costs and long-term benefits?" Ecological economics 84.1 (2012): 91-97.
description	13.	Plourde, A. "Oil, the State, and Federalism: The Rise and Demise of Petro-Canada as a Statist Impulse." The journal of economic history 59.2 (1999): 536-.
description	14.	van Leeuwen, G. "Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: an empirical analysis of Green innovation for the Netherlands." Economics of innovation and new technology 26.1-2 (2016): 1-15.
description	15.	Qiu, Larry D. "Regulation, Innovation, and Firm Selection: The Porter Hypothesis under Monopolistic Competition." Journal of environmental economics and management 92 (2017): 638-658.
description	16.	Broberg, T. "Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry." Journal of productivity analysis 40.1 (2013): 43-56.
description	17.	Porter, M. "What is strategy?" Harvard business review 74.6 (1996): 61-80.
description	18.	Greaker, M. "Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: A new look at the Porter-hypothesis." Journal of environmental economics and management 52.1 (2006): 411-20.
description	19.	Horbach, J. "Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources." Research Policy 37.1 (2008): 163-173.
description	20.	Jaffe, B. Jaffe B. "Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?" Journal of Economic Literature 33.1 (1995): 132-163.