Abstract
Conventional flood frequency analysis is concerned with providing an unbiased estimate of the magnitude of the design flow exceeded with the probabilityp, but sampling uncertainties imply that such estimates will, on average, be exceeded more frequently. An alternative approach is therefore, to derive an estimator which gives an unbiased estimate of flow risk: the difference between the two magnitudes reflects uncertainties in parameter estimation. An empirical procedure has been developed to estimate the mean true exceedance probabilities of conventional estimates made using a GEV distribution fitted by probability weighted moments, and adjustment factors have been determined to enable the estimation of flood magnitudes exceeded with, on average, the desired probability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beard, L.R. 1960: Probability estimates based on small normal distribution samples. J. Geophysical Res. 65, 2143–2148
Cunnane, C.; Nash, J.E. 1971: Bayesian estimation of frequency of hydrologic events. Mathematical Models in Hydrology. IAHS Publ. 100, 47–55
Hardison, C.H.; Jennings, M.E. 1972: Bias in computed flood risk. J. Hyd. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 98, 415–427
Hosking, J.R.M.; Wallis, J.R.; Wood, E.F. 1985: Estimation of the generalised extreme value distribution by the method of probability-weighted moments. Technometrics 27, 251–261
Jenkinson, A.F. 1955: The frequency distribution of the annual maximum (or minimum) of meteorological elements. Quart. J. R. Met. Soc. 81, 158–171
Kuczera, G. 1987: The Bayesian framework for inference in flood frequency analysis. In: Singh, V.P. (ed.) Application of frequency and risk in water resources, Proceedings of a symposium on flood frequency and risk analysis, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 45–61. Reidel: Dordrecht
Lall, U. 1987: Project risk considering sampling uncertainties and a finite project operation period. In: Singh, V.P. (ed.) Application of frequency and risk in water resources, Proceedings of a symposium on flood frequency and risk analysis, Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 305–318. Reidel: Dordrecht
Moran, P.A.P. 1957: The statistical treatment of floods. EOS. Trans. Am. Geophys. union. 38, 519–523
Natural Environment Research Council 1975: Flood studies report. HMSO: London. 5 Vols.
Prescott, P.; Walden, A.T. 1980: Maximum-likelihood estimation of the parameters of the generalised extreme value distribution. Biometrika 67, 723–724
Stedinger, J.R. 1983: Design events with specified flood risk. Water Resour. Res. 19, 511–522
Proschan, F. 1953: Confidence and tolerance intervals for the normal distribution. J. Am. Statist. Assoc., 48
Wood, E.F.; Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. 1975: Bayesian inference and decision making for extreme hydrologic events. Water Resour. Res. 11, 839–843
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arnell, N.W. Unbiased estimation of flood risk with the GEV distribution. Stochastic Hydrol Hydraul 2, 201–212 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01550842
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01550842