Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of woody species distribution in riparian forests of Lower Michigan, USA using map-based models

  • Published:
Wetlands Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to identify and characterize the range of variation in riparian forests across Lower Michigan, USA as a basis for assessing the utility of map-based information in the characterization of riparian environments. We obtained a regional sample of riparian forests and valley-bottom physiography from 94 locations throughout Lower Michigan and distinguished seven major riparian forest types using hierarchical clustering and NMDS ordination. NMDS ordination distances accounted for more than 70% of the distances in species space and achieved excellent discrimination among riparian types. We then evaluated a set of map-based variables indicative of regional climate, catchment hydrology, and valley character relative to ordination axes and interpretations of the autecology of principal tree species from each forest group. Map-based predictors accounted for 83% of the variation in sample scores along NMDS Axis 1 and explained 42% of the variation in Axis 2. Species and riparian types varied along two principal gradients, one associated with climate and geology along a north-south gradient, the second associated with flood duration and power. Map-based interpretations of regional climate and hydroperiod dynamics agreed closely with species-based interpretations of riparian character, although in certain cases, a similar biotic response arose from apparently distinct hydrogeomorphic contexts. Such dynamic patterns underscore the need for better and more explicit linkages between the controls of riparian hydrology and more proximal physical cues on biotic communities in order to understand the drivers of spatial variation in riparian ecosystem structure and composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Albert, D. A., S. R. Denton, and B. V. Barnes. 1986. Regional Landscape Ecosystems of Michigan. School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. E. and B. V. Barnes. 1998. The landscape ecosystem diversity of river floodplains in Northwestern Lower Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28:1405–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. E., M. J. Wiley, and P. W. Seelbach. 2001. GIS-based hydrologic modeling of riparian areas: implications for stream water quality. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:1615–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M. E., M. J. Wiley, P. W. Seelbach, and M. L. Carlson. 2003. A GIS-model of subsurface water potential for aquatic resource inventory, assessment, and environmental management. Environmental Management 32:706–719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. L. 1989. Macro- and micro-scale influences on riparian vegetation in western Colorado. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 79:65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. V. and W. H. Wagner, Jr. 1981. Michigan Trees: a Guide to the Trees of Michigan and the Great Lakes Region. University of Michigan Press. Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, W. J. 1985. Population dynamics of woody plants on a river island. Canadian Journal of Botany 63:647–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, W. J. 1997. Vegetation dynamics on the floodplain of the lower Chippewa River in Wisconsin. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 124:189–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedient, P. B. and W. C. Huber. 1989. Hydrology and Floodplain Analysis. Addison Wesley, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, J. 1994. Among-site variation in riparian vegetation of the Southern California Transverse Ranges. American Midland Naturalist 132:136–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, J. and C. R. Hupp. 2000. Hydrological and geomorphological impacts on riparian plant communities. Hydrological Processes 14:2977–2990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. and D. L. Peterson. 1983. Structural characteristics and biomass production of two Illinois bottomland forests. American Midland Naturalist 11:107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buell, M. E. and W. A. Wistendahl. 1955. Floodplain forests of the Raritan River. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 82:463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analysis of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, C. A. and R. P. Brooks. 2000. Patterns of wetland hydrology in the ridge and valley province, Pennsylvania, USA. Wetlands 20:438–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crow, T. R., M. E. Baker, and B. V. Barnes. 2000. Diversity in riparian landscapes. p. 43–66. In E. S. Verry, J. W. Hornbeck, and C. A. Dolloff (eds.) Riparian Management in Forests of the Continental Eastern U. S. Lewis Publishers, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, K. E., S. G. Pallardy, and H. G. Garret. 1992. Composition and environment of floodplain forests of northern Missouri. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 22:1343–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufrene, M. and P. Legendre. 1997. Species assemblage and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67:345–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. P. and F. Sterns. 1987. A comparison of vegetation and soils in floodplain and basin forested wetlands of southeastern Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist 118:374–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrand, W. R. and D. Bell. 1982. Quaternary geology of Michigan. State of Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Geological Survey, Lansing, MI, USA. Color Map.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, R. J. and J. A. Quinn. 1979. Forest development in relation to topography and soils on a floodplain of the Raritan River, New Jersey. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 106:334–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. V., F. J. Swanson, W. A. McKee, and K. W. Cummins. 1991. An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones: focus on the links between land and water. Bioscience 41:540–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, E. D., K. P. Lewis, and W. A. Wistendahl. 1989. Gradient analysis of floodplain forests along three rivers in unglaciated Ohio. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 116:258–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. R. 1987. Occurrence of vegetation on geomorphic surfaces in the active floodplain of a California alluvial stream. American Midland Naturalist 118:393–05.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. R. and C. Olsen. 1997. Two-stage system for prioritizing riparian restoration at the stream reach and community scales. Restoration Ecology 5:34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauer, F. R. and R. D. Smith. 1998. The hydrogeomorphic approach to functional assessment of riparian wetlands: evaluating impacts and mitigation on river floodplains in the U.S.A. Freshwater Biology 40:517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosner, J. F. and L. S. Minckler. 1963. Bottomland hardwood forests of southern Illinois. Ecology 44:29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupp, C. R. 1982. Stream-grade variation and riparian-forest ecology along Passage Creek, Virginia. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 109:488–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hupp, C. R. and W. R. Osterkamp. 1985. Bottomland vegetation distribution along Passage Creek, Virginia in relation to fluvial landforms. Ecology 66:670–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. C. 2000. Tree recruitment and survival in rivers: influence of hydrological processes. Hydrological Processes 14:3051–3074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley, and R. E. Sparks. 1989. The flood-pulse concept in river floodplain systems. Canadian Special Publications in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 106:110–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, J. 1999. Inventory and vegetation classification of floodplain forest communities in Massachusetts. Rhodora 101:105–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapin, M. and B. V. Barnes. 1995. Using the landscape ecosystem approach to assess species and ecosystem diversity. Conservation Biology 9:1148–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, A. A., R. O. Petty, D. K. Sterling, and W. Van Adsall. 1961. Vegetation and environment along the Wabash and Tippecanoe rivers. Ecological Monographs 37:105–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, B. and M. J. Mefford. 1999. PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. C. and R. E. Sparks. 1998. Forest compositional change at the confluence of the Illinois and Mississippi Rivers. Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science 91:33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, C., A. Ekblad, M. Dynesius, S. Backe, M. Gardfjell, B. Carlberg, S. Hellqvist, and R. Jansson. 1994. A comparison of species richness and traits of riparian plants between a main channel and its tributaries. Journal of Ecology 82:281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, C. and G. Grelsson. 1995. The fragility of ecosystems: a review. Journal of Applied Ecology 32:677–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. P., J. C. Schmidt, J. P. Dobrowolski, C. P. Hawkins, and C. M. U. Neale. 1997. Identifying sites for riparian wetland restoration: application of a model to the upper Arkansas River Basin. Restoration Ecology 5:85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. D., C. P. Hawkins, and M. P. O’Neill. 1997. The role of GIS in selecting sites for riparian restoration based on hydrology and land use. Restoration Ecology 5:56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm, S. A. 1977. The Fluvial System. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. and R. R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W. H. Freeman Publishers, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabacchi, E., A. M. Planty-Tabacchi, M. Jacoba Salinias, and H. Decamps. 1996. Landscape structure and diversity in riparian plant communities: a longitudinal comparative study. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 12:367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. 1972. Ecological and genetic isolation of Eraxinus americana and Fraxinus pennsylvanica. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. 2001. Relationships between vegetation patterns and hydroperiod on the Roanoke River floodplain, North Carolina. Plant Ecology 156:43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, E. G. 1972. Michigan Flora. Part I. Gymnosperms and Monocots. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, E. G. 1985. Michigan Flora Part II. Dicots. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, E. G. 1996. Michigan Flora. Part III. Dicots concluded. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. V. and J. A. Stanford. 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regulated Rivers Research and Management 10:159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew E. Baker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baker, M.E., Wiley, M.J. Characterization of woody species distribution in riparian forests of Lower Michigan, USA using map-based models. Wetlands 24, 550–561 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0550:COWSDI]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0550:COWSDI]2.0.CO;2

Key Words

Navigation