Abstract
Knowledge and literature of neuroscience started growing steadily during the last few centuries. This paper aims to study the growth of knowledge in neuroscience as well as its literature. The first part of the paper, enumerates a historical survey of the growth of knowledge based on published data. This is done in view of the fact that a consolidated information at one place will be of great value to the students of scientometrics and also to the research scholars who are desirous to undertake research in this discipline. The second part of the paper is entirely based on experimental data which were collected to analyse the growth of literature of the subject.
Neuroscience is notable for its wide range of approaches and techniques. In no other branch of research such a manysided approach is so essential. As a consequence last few decades have witnessed an accelerated research tempo and unprecedented growth of the literature on the subject covering its different sub-fields with gradual and systematic transgression of the conventional boundaries between them. To cope with the growth of literature, a new bibliometric technique has been applied to rank periodicals in the field based on 5785 citation data collected from the bibliographic data base published in the source journal namely,Annual Review of Neuroscience. It is expected that this list will reflect the impact of literature on the advancement of knowledge in the field of neuroscience. A striking feature of this study is the comparatively small contribution (8.8%) coming from the application of biochemical techniques and concepts to neuroscience research which differs from what we had noted earlier in the case of other biomedical disciplines. High position occupied by multidisciplinary science journals brings out the significance of new neuroscience research to science as a whole and confirms the importance of this category of journals in the dissemination of knowledge for the overall growth of science. Relatively low proportion, of citations of journals of medicine, both general as well as specialities, in spite of direct relevance of much work in this field to neurological and mental illness reflects the preponderance of interest in the funcamental aspects of neuroscience research. Like other biomedical disciplines neuroscience literature also exhibits English as the most-preferred lingua franca of the subject; dominance of journals published from USA, UK, Germany and the Netherland; a wide scatter of cited literature showing the multidisciplinary approach characteristic of present-day neuroscience research. The results of this study support Bradford's Law of Scattering and also Sengupta's Law of Bibliometrics. It is expected that the present ranking list will be of great help to the working neuroscientists to select a handful of core periodicals in the field for regular browsing from the viewpoint of their importance and significance as these core journals identify maximum segment of contemporary literature on the topics of direct relevance to their day to day research in the field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. R. LURIA,Higher Cortical Functions in Man, London, 1966, Tavistock Publications.
A. CASTIGLIONI,The Renaissance of Medicine in Italy, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press Baltimore, 1932. USA.
A. VESALIUS,De Humani Corporis Fabrica Libri Septem, Basel, 1543, Switzerland.
R. DESCARTES,Tractatus de Homine, Amsterdam, 1686, Netherlands.
T. WILLIS,The Remaining Medical Works of the Famous and Renowned Physicians, Dr. Thomas Willis, Vol. VI. Of the Anatomy of the Brain, Trans. byS. Pordage, 1861, London.
A. WALLER,Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Academie des sciences, Paris, 35 (1852) 564.
L. ROLANDO,Saggio sopra la vera struttura del cervello dell'oumo e dogl'ani mali e sopra le funzioni del systema nervosa. Stamperia Privilegiata, Sassari, 1809.
de R. VIEUSSEWS,Nevrographia universadis, J. Certe, Lugduni Batavorum, 1685.
I. M. LANCIST,Dissertatio de sede cogitandis anima (Venezia), 1739.
N. STENSEN, Discours sur l'anatomie du cerveau dans uneassemblée chez M. Thevenot en 1668. InExposition anatomique sur la structure du corps humain, by J. B. Winslow, Vol. IV, Paris, 1776, pp. 147–192.
M. MALPIGHI,Opera Pasthuma, G. Gallet, Amsterdam, 1700, Netherlands.
J. BOHN,Circulus anatomico-physiologicus, Lipsiae, J. F. Gleditsch, 1686.
P. VERNEY,Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, 19 (1697) 226.
L. C. A. MEYER,Anatomisch-physiologische Abhandlungen, Vom Geluin, Berlin-Leipzig, 1779.
F. J. Gall, H. SPURZHEIM,Anatomie et physiologie due systema nerueaux en general er du cerveau en particulier, 5 vols, Schoell, Paris, (1810–1818)
A. von HALLER,Elementa physiologiae corporis humani, Lausanne, 1769.
M. J. P. FLOURENS,Archives générales de médicine, 2 (1823) 121.
C. J. J. Le GALLOIS,Expérience sur le principle de la vie O'Hantel, Paris, 1812.
R. WHYTT,Observation on the Dropsy in the Brain, J. Balfour, Edinburgh., 1768, Great Britain.
C. BELL,Idea of a New Anatomy of the Brain, Strahan and Preston, London, 1811, Great Britain.
F. MAGENDIE,Journal de physiologie et de experimentelle pathologie, 2 (1822) 276, 366.
M. HALL,Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 123 (1833) 635.
F. L. GOLTZ,Pfügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des menschen und der Tiere, 8 (1874) 460.
C. S. SHERRINGTON,The Integrative Action of the Nervous System, London, 1906, Great Britain.
P. BROCA,Bulletin de la societe d'anatomie, 36 (1861) 330.
C. WERNICKE,Der aphasische Symptomenkomplex, Cohn and Weigart, Breslau, 1874.
G. T. FRITSCH, E. HITZIG,Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie, 37 (1870) 102.
W. BETZ,Zentralblatt für de medizinische Wissenschaften, 12 (1874) 578.
A. F. FOURCROY,Annales de chimie, 1 (1793) 282.
L. N. VAUQUELIN,Annales de chimie et de physique, 81 (1812) 37.
L. J. W. THUDICHUM,British Medical Journal, 2 (1883) 524.
L. J. W. THUDICHUM,A Treatise on the Chemical Constitution of the Brain, London, 1884, Great Britain.
C. A. HERTER,American Journal of Physiology, 12 (1905) 128.
W. von WALDEYER,Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift, 12 (1891) 1213, 1244, 1287.
B. NAUNYN,Archiv vür experementelle Pathologie, 33 (1893) 1.
P. MARIE, C. FOIX,Revue neurologique, 31 (1917) 117.
I. P. PAVLOV,The Theory of Conditioned Reflexes, Kegan, Trench, Trubner and Co., 1937, London, Great Britain.
O. FOERSTER,Brain, 59 (1936) 135.
W. R. HESS,Berichte Physiologie, 42 (1927) 554.
W. R. INGRAM, F. I. HANNETT, S. W. RANSON,Journal of Comparative Neurology, 55 (1932) 333.
K. BRODMANN,Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie, Leipzig. 2 (1903) 79, 133.
A. W. CAMPBELL,Histological Studies on the Localisation of Cerebral Function, Cambridge University Press, 1905, Great Britain.
O. VOGT, C. VOGT,Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie, Leipzig, 25 (1919) 277.
K. GOLDSTEIN, A. GELB,Zeischrift für de gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 41 (1918) 124.
W. PENFIELD, E. BOLDREY,Brain, 60 (1937) 389.
E. A. SPIEGEL, M. MARKS, A. J. LEE,Science, N. Y. 106 (1947) 349.
J. TALAIRACH, H. HÉCAEN, M. DAVID, M. MONNIER, J. von AJURIAGUERRA,Revue neurologique, 81 (1949) 1.
J. H. AUSTIN, A. S. BALASUBRAMANIAN, T. N. PATTABIRAMAN, S. SARASWATHI, D. K. BASU, B. K. BACHHAWAT,Journal of Neurochemistry, 10 (1963) 805.
A. E. KORNMÜLLER,Journal für Psychologie und Neurologie, Leipzig, 44 (1932) 447.
A. L. HODGKIN, A. F. HUXLEY,Nature, Lond., 144 (1939) 710.
A. L. HODGKIN,Biological Reviews, 26 (1951) 339.
J. C. ECCLES,Nature, Lond., 168 (1951) 371.
J. H. NAUTA, M. FEIRTAG,Scientific American, 241 (1979) 78.
W. M. COWAN,Scientific American, 241 (1979) 106.
N. GESCHWIND,Scientific American, 241 (1979) 158.
S. S. KETY,Scientific American, 241 (1979) 172.
D. H. HUBEL,Scientific American, 241 (1979) 38.
L. L. IVERSEN,Scientific American, 241 (1979) 118.
F. H. C. CRICK,Scientific American, 241 (1979) 181.
C. F. STEVENS,Scientific American, 241 (1979) 48.
K. C. DIXON, Some biochemical signposts in the progress of neurology, In:Chemistry of Life by J. NEEDHAM, Cambridge University Press, 1970, p. 119, U.K.
P. L. K. GROSS, E. M. GROSS,Science, N. Y., 66 (1927) 385.
C. H. BROWN,ACRL Monograph No. 16, Chicago, 195, pp. 1–156.
I. N. SENGUPTA,International Library Review, 4 (1972) 169.
I. N. SENGUPTA,Journal of Documentation, 29 (1973) 192.
I. N. SENGUPTA,UNESCO Bulletin for Libraries, 24 (1970) 143.
I. N. SENGUPTA,International Library Review, 6 (1974) 353.
I. N. SENGUPTA,International Library Review, 6 (1974) 147.
I. N. SENGUPTA,International Library Review, 6 (1974) 483.
I. N. SENGUPTA,Scientometrics, 8 (1985) 365.
C. H. BRADFORD,Documentation, Public Affairs Press, D. C., 1950.
I. N. SENGUPTA,Nature, Lond., 244 (1973) 75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sengupta, I.N. The growth of knowledge and literature in neuroscience. Scientometrics 17, 253–288 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026413
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02026413