Abstract
In spite of recent progresses in evaporation estimate through advanced models and laboratory experiments, the drying process of bare soils through its successive stages remains difficult to predict. A study which addresses evaporation modeling in natural bare soils is presented. It relies upon hydro-meteorological measurements performed in a plot with a bare silt loam soil maintained in natural conditions. The following steps are involved: estimate of daily actual evaporation, Ea, through the hydrological balance, scaling with pan evaporation measurements, Epan, and analysis of the relation of Ea/Epan with the soil moisture vertical profile. The results enable us (1) to check the occurrence of the first stage of the evaporation process, characterized by not limited-soil water supply and high evaporative rates, and (2) to identify the transition from the first to the second stage, with decreasing soil water-limited Ea values. The last point requires the introduction of a soil water content threshold at 5 cm depth, that is associated with the soil field capacity. The adopted procedure provides insights on the soil water dynamics at depths differently involved through the successive stages of the evaporative process. Finally, indications on the use of pan evaporation measurements in evaporative rate estimate at least during the first stage of the process are also given.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, Rome
Aminzadeh M, Roderick ML, Or D (2016) A generalized complementary relationship between actual and potential evaporation defined by a reference surface temperature. Water Resour Res 52(1):385–406. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017969
Assouline S, Narkis K, Gherabli R, Lefort P, Prat M (2014) Analysis of the impact of surface layer properties on evaporation from porous systems using column experiments and modified definition of characteristic length. Water Resour Res 50(5):3933–3955. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014489
Balugani E, Lubczynski MW, Metselaar K (2016) A framework for sourcing of evaporation between saturated and unsaturated zone in bare soil condition. Hydrol Sci J 61(11):1981–1995. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.966718
Banimahd SA, Khalili D, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Zand-Parsa S (2016) Evaluation of groundwater potential recharge models considering estimated bare soil evaporation, in a semi-arid foothill region. Hydrol Sci J 61(1–2):162–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.959957
Berretta C, Poë S, Stovin V (2014) Moisture content behavior in extensive green roofs during dry periods: the influence of vegetation and substrate characteristics. J Hydrol 516:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.04.001
Bittelli M, Ventura F, Campbell GS, Snyder RL, Gallegati F, Pisa PR (2008) Coupling of heat, water vapor, and liquid water fluxes to compute evaporation in bare soils. J Hydrol 362(3-4):191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.08.014
Brutsaert W, Chen D (1995) Desorption and the two stages of drying of natural tallgrass prairie. Water Resour Res 31(5):1305–1313. https://doi.org/10.1029/95WR00323
Grifoll J, JMa G, Cohen Y (2005) Non-isothermal soil water transport and evaporation. Adv Water Resour 28(11):1254–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.04.008
Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Jackson RD, Kimball BA, Nakayama FS (1974) The three stages of drying of a field soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 38(5):831–837. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1974.03615995003800050037x
Jalota SK, Prihar SS (1986) Effects of atmospheric evaporativity, soil type and redistribution time on evaporation from bare soil. Aust J Soil Res 24(3):357–366. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9860357
Kahler DM, Brutsaert W (2006) Complementary relationship between daily evaporation in the environment and pan evaporation. Water Resources Research W05413 42(5):1–9
Lehmann P, Assouline S, Or D (2008) Characteristic lengths affecting evaporative drying of porous media. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 77(5):1–15
Lemon ER (1956) The potentialities for decreasing soil moisture evaporation loss. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 20(1):120–125. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1956.03615995002000010031x
Linsley RK, Franzini JB, Freyberg DL, Tchobanoglous G (1992) Water resources engineering. McGraw-Hill, Singapore
McVicar TR, Roderick ML, Donohue RJ, Li LT, Van Niel TG, Thomas A, Grieser J, Jhajharia D, Himri Y, Mahowald NM, Mescherskaya AV, Kruger AC, Rehman S, Dinpashoh Y (2012) Global review and synthesis of trends in observed terrestrial near-surface wind speeds: implications for evaporation. J Hydrol 416-417:182–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.024
Melone F, Corradini C, Morbidelli R, Saltalippi C (2006) Laboratory experimental check of a conceptual model for infiltration under complex rainfall patterns. Hydrol Process 20(3):439–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5913
Morbidelli R, Corradini C, Saltalippi C, Flammini A, Rossi E (2011) Infiltration-soil moisture redistribution under natural conditions: experimental evidence as a guideline for realizing simulation models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(9):2937–2945. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-2937-2011
Morbidelli R, Corradini C, Saltalippi C, Brocca L (2012) Initial soil water content as input to field-scale infiltration and surface runoff models. Water Resour Manag 26(7):1793–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-9986-3
Novak MD (2010) Dynamics of the near-surface evaporation zone and corresponding effects on the surface energy balance of a drying bare soil. Agric For Meteorol 150(10):1358–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.06.005
Or D, Lehmann P, Shahraeeni E, Shokri N (2013) Advances in soil evaporation physics-a review. Vadose Zone J 12(4):1–16
Philip JR, de Vries DA (1957) Moisture movement in porous materials under temperature gradients. Transactions American Geophysical Union 38(2):222–232. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i002p00222
Rotsatyn LD, Roderick ML, Farquhar D (2006) A simple pan-evaporation model for analysis of climate simulations: evaluation over Australia. Geophys Res Lett 33(17):L17715. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027114
Shokri N, Lehmann P, Or D (2010) Evaporation from layered porous media. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 115(6):B06204
Shokri N, Sahimi M, Or D (2012) Morphology, propagation dynamics and scaling characteristics of drying fronts in porous media. Geophysical Research Letters L09401 39(9):1–5
Wythers KR, Lauenroth WK, Paruelo JM (1999) Bare-soil evaporation under semiarid field conditions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63(5):1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1999.6351341x
Acknowledgments
This research was mainly financed by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (PRIN 2015: Innovative monitoring and design strategies for sustainable landslide risk mitigation).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flammini, A., Corradini, C., Morbidelli, R. et al. Experimental Analyses of the Evaporation Dynamics in Bare Soils under Natural Conditions. Water Resour Manage 32, 1153–1166 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1860-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1860-x