Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative vegetation survey with focus on cryptogamic covers in the high Arctic along two differing catenas

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Polar Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 08 October 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

Although cryptogamic covers are important ecosystem engineers in high Arctic tundra, they were often neglected in vegetation surveys. Hence we conducted a systematic survey of cryptogamic cover and vascular plant coverage and composition at two representative, but differing Arctic sites (Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard) along catenas with a natural soil moisture gradient, and integrated these data with physical–chemical soil properties. Soil samples were taken for comprehensive pedological and mineralogical analyses. Vegetation surveys were conducted based on classification by functional groups. Vascular plants were identified to species level. Correlation and multivariate statistical analysis were applied to determine the key environmental factors explaining vegetation patterns along the soil moisture gradients. We observed significant differences in gravimetric water, soil organic matter and nutrient contents along the moisture gradients. These differences were coincident with a shift in vegetation cover and species composition. While chloro- and cyanolichens were abundant at the drier sites, mosses dominated the wetter and vascular plants the intermediate plots. Twenty four vascular plant species could be identified, of which only six were present at both sites. Cryptogamic covers generally dominated with maximum areal coverage up to 70% and hence should be considered as a new additional syntaxon in future ground-truth and remote sensing based vegetation surveys of Svalbard. Multivariate analysis revealed that soil moisture showed the strongest relation between vegetation patterns, together with NH4–N and pH. In conclusion, soil moisture is a key driver in controlling cryptogamic cover and vegetation coverage and vascular plant species composition in high Arctic tundra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 08 October 2019

    This correction stands to the correct a spelling error to contributor name: Karin Glaser. The author group and the publisher wish all to recognize the name as Karin Glaser and not the former. The original article has been corrected.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff at the AWIPEW station, Ny-Ålesund for excellent technical and logistic support during the summer campaign 2017.

Funding

This study was funded through the 2015–2016 BiodivERsA COFUND call for research proposals, with the national funders of Belgium (BELSPO BR/175/A1/CLIMARCTIC-BE), Germany (DFG KA899/33–1), Norway (The Research Council of Norway 270252/E50), Spain (MINECO, PCIN2016-001, CTM2016-79741), and Switzerland (SNSF 31BD30_172464).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RK, VH, AF, BT, DV, CS, BF, EV, AQ, MS, KG, and UK all contributed to the study design as well as sample and data collection during the joint summer expedition 2017 in Ny-Ålesund. MA, CB, MP, AF, and LDM analyzed samples for specific parameters. RK, VH, KG, and UK undertook all statistical analysis. RK, VH, and UK wrote the first version of the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulf Karsten.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial, as well as non-financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

300_2019_2588_MOESM1_ESM.pdf

Fig. 8.1-8.18. Digital photographs of the 18 permanent sampling plots showing the dominant vegetation. K: Knudsenheia; O:Ossian-Sarsfjellet; K1.1-K1.3: dry plots; K2.1-K2.3: intermediate plots; K3.1-K3.3: wet plots; O1.1-O1.3: dry plots; O2.1-O2.3: intermediate plots; O3.1-O3.3: wet plots; Fig. 9. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (nMDS) plot visualizes the similarity and dissimilarity of the vascular plant diversity in Knudsenheia (KH) and Ossian-Sarsfjellet (OS) at different plots (d-dry, i-intermediate, w-wet). The black arrows indicate the influence direction of the only three significantly correlated soil parameters: ammonium, pH, sand content and moisture. Ellipses correspond to 95% confidence interval. Stress = 0.17. Supplementary file1 (PDF 11356 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 88 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kern, R., Hotter, V., Frossard, A. et al. Comparative vegetation survey with focus on cryptogamic covers in the high Arctic along two differing catenas. Polar Biol 42, 2131–2145 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-019-02588-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-019-02588-z

Keywords

Navigation