Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:50:48.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic components and apparatus for use in polar field operations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

L. G. Atkinson
Affiliation:
Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough.
G. W. A. Dummer
Affiliation:
Royal Radar Establishment, Malvern.
S. Evans
Affiliation:
Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge.

Extract

It was noted in Table 3 of the first paper that the failure rate of common types of valves is about one half per cent per thousand hours of operation. Some other components are as unreliable as this, but they are not employed in such large numbers in typical electronic equipment so that (at least until very recently) valves are much the commonest cause of electronic equipment failure. The mechanical and electrical tests which valves are required to pass before the Armed Services grant type approval are given in Joint Service Specification K1001, Ministry of Aviation, June 1958. In an analysis of failure reports made in 1953 in the Royal Navy, the Royal Air Force, civil aviation, and under typical laboratory conditions, the proportion of faults traced to valves ranged from 45 to 55 per cent of the total. Under conditions of rough handling the average life of valves is likely to be further reduced, more so than for any other common component, so that the number of faults and the proportion of faults due to valves, will be even higher.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schwartz, S.Ed. 1960. Selected semiconductor circuits. New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Sellers, E. S. 1951. The selection of lubricants for use at low temperatures. Polar Record, Vol 6, No 42, p 237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar