Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A simple general method to evaluate intra-specific transpiration parameters within and among seedling families

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A method to evaluate the genetic control of plant response to increasing soil water deficit is proposed. A description of single tree transpiration behavior was obtained considering parameters independent from air and soil conditions. We removed environmental effects by using two approaches: the normalization of drought data to control (watered) plants and the fitting of a process model. We analyzed the transpiration of 475 4-year-old European beech seedlings, belonging to eight full-sib families. Approximately, one-third of the seedlings were kept in well-watered conditions while the others were exposed to drought for 14 days. Daily plant transpiration was estimated as the difference between two subsequent gravimetric measurements. A mechanistic model was fitted to transpiration data separately for each tree. In the model, the relationship of transpiration with vapor pressure deficit and soil water deficit of each tree is modulated by three parameters: maximum leaf conductance ( \(g_{\rm l}^M\)), maximum transpiration in well-watered soil conditions \((E_{\rm l}^{M_0})\) and a parameter describing stomatal sensitivity to soil water deficit (c). The model successfully fitted most single tree data and a distribution of estimates for the three parameters (\(g_{\rm l}^M\), \(E_{\rm l}^{M_0}\) and c) was obtained. Predicted transpiration values were in good agreement with observed data (R 2 = 0.86). The model approach produced parameters significantly correlated with those of the “normalization to control” approach. Estimated parameters vary considerably among trees, suggesting the presence of individual differences in stomatal behavior and response to drought. In spite of a large among tree (within family) variation, the among families component for \(g_{\rm l}^M\), \(E_{\rm l}^{M_0}\) and c explained 9.5, 3.3 and 0.1% of total parameters variation suggesting a significant genetic control of transpiration processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams MD (1994) Genotypic and phenotypic variation as stress adaptations in temperate tree species: a review of several case studies. Tree Physiol 14:833–842

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerly DD, Reich PB (1999) Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. Am J Bot 86:1272–1281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arntz AM, Delph LF (2001) Pattern and process: evidence for the evolution of photosynthetic traits in natural populations. Oecologia 127:455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NH, Turelli M (1989) Evolutionary quantitative genetics: how little do we know. Annu Rev Genet 23:337–370

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bauerle WL, Post CJ, McLeod MF, Dudley JB, Toler JE (2002) Measurement and modeling of the transpiration of a temperate red maple container nursery. Agr For Met 114:45–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker WA (1992) Manual of quantitative genetics. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernetti G (1995) Selvicoltura speciale. UTET, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernier PY, Bréda N, Granier A, Raulier F, Mathieu F (2002) Validation of a canopy gas exchange model and derivation of a soil water modifier for transpiration for sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.) using sap flow density measurements. Forest Ecol Manag 163:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breuer L, Eckhardt K, Frede HG (2003) Plant parameter values for models in temperate climates. Ecol Model 169:237–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavender-Bares J, Holbrook NM (2001) Hydraulic properties and freezing-induced cavitation in sympatric evergreen and deciduous oaks with contrasting habitats. Plant Cell Environ 24:1243–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceroni M, Leonardi S, Piovani P, Menozzi P (1997) Incrocio diallelico in faggio: obiettivi, metodologie, primi risultati. Monti e Boschi 48:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochard H, Lemoine D, Dreyer E (1999) The effects of acclimation to sunlight on the xylem vulnerability to embolism in Fagus sylvatica L. Plant Cell Environ 22:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1989) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks PJ, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1997) The apparent feedforward response of stomata to air vapour pressure deficit: information revealed by different experimental procedures with two rainforest trees. Plant Cell Environ 20:142–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geber MA, Dawson TE (1997) Genetic variation in stomatal and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis in the annual plant, Polygonum arenastrum. Oecologia 109:535–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geber MA, Griffen LR (2003) Inheritance and natural selection on functional traits. Int J Plant Sci 164:521–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gessler A, Rienks M, Rennenberg H (2000) NH3 and NO2 fluxes between beech trees and the atmosphere—correlation with climatic and physiological parameters. New Phytol 147:539–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Granier A, Lousteau D (1994) Measuring and modelling the transpiration of a maritime pine canopy from sap-flow data. Agr For Met 71:61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granier A, Biron P, Lemoine D (2000) Water balance, transpiration and canopy conductance in two beech stands. Agr For Met 100:291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanks RJ, Shawcroft RW (1965) An economical lysimeter for evapotranspiration studies. Agron J 57:634–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001. The scientific basis. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y, Nogua M, Griggs D, Vander Linden P, Maskell K (eds) Climate Change 2001. The scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • Jarvis AJ, Davies WJ (1997) Whole plant ABA flux and the regulation of water loss in Cedrella odorosa. Plant Cell Environ 20:521–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (1992) Plants and microclimate. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J (1980) Responses of plants to environmental stresses, vol I. Chilling, freezing and high temperature stresses, 2nd edn. Academic, New York

  • Lu P, Woo KC, Liu ZT (2002) Estimation of whole-plant transpiration of bananas using sap flow measurements. J Exp Bot 53:1771–1779

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medlyn BE, Barton CVM, Broadmeadow MSJ, Ceulemans R, De Angelis P, Forstreuter M, Freeman M, Jackson SB, Kellomaki S, Laitat E, Rey A, Roberntz P, Sigurdsson BD, Strassemeyer J, Wang K, Curtis PS, Jarvis PG (2001) Stomatal conductance of forest species after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 concentration: a synthesis. New Phytol 149:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzer FC, Grantz DA, Goldstein G, Saliendra NZ (1990) Leaf water relations and mainteinance of gas exchange in coffee cultivars grown in drying soil. Plant Physiol 94:1781–1787

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1995) A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ 18:357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicotra AB, Chazdon RL, Schlichting CD (1997) Patterns of genotypic variation and phenotypic plasticity of light response in two tropical Piper (Piperaceae) species. Am J Bot 84:1542–1552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearcy RW, Schulze ED, Zimmermann R (1989) Measurements of transpiration and leaf conductance. In: Pearcy RW, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Rundel PW (eds) Plant physiological ecology. Chapmann and Hall, London, pp 138–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Peuke AD, Schraml C, Hartung W, Rennenberg H (2002) Identification of drought-sensitive beech ecotypes by physiological parameters. New Phytol 154:373–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ray JD, Sinclair TR (1998) The effect of pot size on growth and transpiration of maize and soybean during water deficit stress. J Exp Bot 49:1381–1386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2004) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 3-900051-00-3, http://www.R-project.org

  • Sackali MS, Ozturk M (2004) Eco-physiological behaviour of some mediterranean plants as suitable candidates for reclamation of degraded areas. J Arid Environ 57:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalfi M, Troggio M, Piovani P, Leonardi S, Magnaschi G, Vendramin GG, Menozzi P (2004) A RAPD, AFLP and SSR linkage map, and QTL analysis in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Theor Appl Genet 108:433–441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the European Union (QLRT-1999-01210, DYNABEECH) and the project M.U.R.S.T. COFIN2003 (Coordinator: Prof. Orazio Ciancio). We declare that the experiments comply with the current laws of Italy where the experiments were carried out. We wish to thank Marco Borghetti, Mariachiara Naldi and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Leonardi.

Additional information

Communicated by Hermann Heilmeier

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leonardi, S., Piovani, P., Magnani, F. et al. A simple general method to evaluate intra-specific transpiration parameters within and among seedling families. Oecologia 149, 185–193 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0427-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0427-y

Keywords

Navigation