Skip to main content
Log in

Foragers versus farmers: contrasting effects of two behavioural groups of herbivores on coral reefs

  • Ecosystem Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Herbivorous fishes have been attributed a central role in structuring benthic communities on coral reefs. However, the relative importance of different behavioural groups of herbivores may differ and their interactions may be complex. This study focuses on an experiment that discriminates between two groups of herbivorous fish: (1) “Foragers” (relatively mobile, schooling grazers, including parrotfishes and surgeonfishes) and (2) “Farmers” (highly site-attached, territorial species, primarily damselfishes). Preliminary observations at Kimbe Bay (Papua New Guinea) showed that both groups were common, and that farmers defended areas from foragers and maintained algal communities that were distinct from the surrounding undefended substratum. An orthogonal combination of a farmer removal treatment and a forager exclusion treatment was applied to isolate their separate effects on algae and corals, and to determine whether farmer territory composition results from forager exclusion or algal cultivation. The experiment showed that foragers had quantitatively greater and qualitatively different effects on sessile benthic community structure than farmers. Where foragers were excluded, there were substantial increases in the cover and biomass of macro-algae and a decline in some corals, regardless of the presence of farmers. Where farmers were removed there was a moderate decline in the cover of some food algal species, regardless of whether foragers had access. No effect of the exclusion of foragers by farmers could be detected. Our results support prevailing views that foragers have a major impact on coral reefs and farmers cultivate selected algae, but challenge the hypothesis that damselfish influence habitat structure by moderating forager disturbance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler PB, Raff DA, Lauenroth WK (2001) The effect of grazing on the spatial heterogeneity of vegetation. Oecologia 128:465–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellwood DR, Choat JH (1990) A functional analysis of grazing in parrotfishes (family Scaridae): the ecological implications. Env Biol Fish 28:189–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter RC (1986) Partitioning herbivory and its effects on coral reef algal communities. Ecol Monogr 56:345–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli DM, Jones GP, McCook LJ (2001) Territorial damselfishes as determinants of the structure of benthic communities on coral reefs. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 39:355–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Choat JH (1991) The biology of herbivorous fishes on coral reefs. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic, California, pp 120–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Choat JH, Bellwood DR (1985) Interactions amongst herbivorous fishes on a coral reef: influence of spatial variation. Mar Biol 89:221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Macdonald KS, Rhode JM, Parker JD (2001) Grazer diversity, functional redundancy, and productivity in seagrass beds: an experimental test. Ecology 82:2417–2434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira CEL, Gonçalves JEA, Coutinho R, Peret AC (1998) Herbivory by the Dusky Damselfish Stegastes fuscus (Cuvier, 1830) in a tropical rocky shore: effects on the benthic community. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 229:241–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason MG (1996) Coral recruitment in Moorea, French Polynesia—the importance of patch type and temporal variation. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 207:79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hata H, Kato M (2002) Weeding by the herbivorous damselfish Stegastes nigricans in nearly monocultural algae farms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 237:227–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (1991) Fish-seaweed interactions on coral reefs: effects of herbivorous fishes and adaptations of their prey. In: Sale PF (ed) The ecology of fishes on coral reefs. Academic, San Diego, pp 96–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (1997) The ecology and evolution of seaweed-herbivore interactions on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 16(Suppl):S67–S76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA, Brostoff WN (1983) Damselfish as keystone species in reverse: intermediate disturbance and diversity of reef algae. Science 230:511–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hixon MA, Brostoff WN (1996) Succession and herbivory: effects of differential fish grazing on Hawaiian coral–reef algae. Ecol Monogr 66:67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn MH (1989) Biology of marine herbivorous fishes. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev 27:167–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Hourigan TF (1986) An experimental removal of a territorial pomacentrid: effects on the occurrence and behaviour of competitors. Env Biol Fish 15:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes TP (1994) Catastrophes, phase shifts, and large-scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef. Science 265:1547–1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine GV (1980) Fish as farmers: an experimental study of herbivory in a territorial coral reef damselfish. Amer Soc Zool 20:822–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones GP (1986) Feeding selectivity in relation to territory size in a herbivorous fish. Oecologia 68:549–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klumpp DW, McKinnon AD, Daniel P (1987) Damselfish territories: zones of high productivity on coral reefs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 40:41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lassuy DR (1980) Effects of “farming” behaviour by Eupomacentrus lividus and Hemiglyphidodon plagiometapon on algal community structure. Bull Mar Sci 30:304–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SM (1986) The role of herbivorous fishes in the organisation of a Caribbean reef community. Ecol Monogr 56:183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lirman D (2001) Competition between macroalgae and corals: effects of herbivore exclusion and increased algal biomass on coral survivorship and growth. Coral Reefs 19:392–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobel PS (1980) Herbivory by damselfishes and their role in coral reef community ecology. Bull Mar Sci 30:273–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1983) Littorina and Fucus: effects of herbivores, substratum heterogeneity, and plant escapes during succession. Ecology 64:1116–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J, Gaines SD (1981) A unified approach to marine plant-herbivore interactions. I. Populations and communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:405–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney BM (1981) An examination of interspecific territoriality in the dusky damselfish, Eupomacentrus dorsopunicans Poey. Bull Mar Sci 31:141–146

    Google Scholar 

  • McClanahan TR, Nugues M, Mwachireya S (1994) Fish and sea urchin herbivory and competition in Kenyan coral reef lagoons: the role of reef management. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 184:237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCook LJ (1999) Macroalgae, nutrients and phase shifts on coral reefs: scientific issues and management consequences for the Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs 18:357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1979) Grazing as an optimisation process: grass-ungulate relationships in the Serengeti. Am Nat 113:691–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ, Ruess RW, Seagle SW (1988) Large mammals and process dynamics in African Ecosystems. BioScience 38:794–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MW, Hay ME (1996) Coral–seaweed–grazer–nutrient interactions on temperate reefs. Ecol Monogr 66:323–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery WL (1980) The impact of non-selective grazing by the giant blue damselfish, Microspathodon dorsalis, on algal communities in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Bull Mar Sci 30:290–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden JC, Lobel PS (1978) The role of herbivorous fishes and urchins in coral reef communities. Env Biol Fish 3:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen DF (1980) How plants may benefit from the animals that eat them. Oikos 35:230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmisano S, Fox LR (1997) Effects of mammal and insect herbivory on population dynamics of a native Californian thistle, Cirsium occidentale. Oecologia 111:413–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennings SC (1996) Indirect interactions on coral reefs. In: Birkeland C (ed) Life and death on coral reefs. Chapman& Hall, New York, pp 249–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaganyi EE, Branch GM (2000) Does the limpet Patella cochlear fertilize its own algal garden? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 194:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter KG (1977) The plant–animal interface in freshwater ecosystems. Am Sci 65:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Preen A (1995) Impacts of dugong foraging on seagrass habitats—observational and experimental evidence for cultivation grazing. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 124:201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson DR, Sweatman HPA, Fletcher EA, Cleland MG (1976) Schooling as a mechanism for circumventing the territoriality of competitors. Ecology 57:1208–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR (1987) Is rate of removal of algae reduced inside territories of tropical damselfishes? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 110:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russ GR, McCook LJ (1999) Potential effects of a cyclone on benthic algal production and yield to grazers on coral reef across the central Great Barrier Reef. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 235:237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sammarco PW, Williams AH (1982) Damselfish territoriality: influence on Diadema distribution and implications for coral community structure. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 8:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steneck RS (1988) Herbivory on coral reefs: a synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 6th international coral reef symposium 1:37–49

  • Sterner RW (1986) Herbivores’ direct and indirect effects on algal populations. Science 231:605–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellington GM (1982) Depth zonation of corals in the Gulf of Panama: control and facilitation by resident reef fihes. Ecol Monogr 52:223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams DM (1980) Dynamics of the pomacentrid community on small patch reefs in one tree lagoon (Great Barrier Reef). Bull Mar Sci 30:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson S, Bellwood DR (1997) Cryptic dietary components of territorial damselfishes (Pomacentridae, Labroidei). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 153:299–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JB, Bellwood DR, Choat JH, Furnas MJ (2003) Detritus in the epilithic algal community and its use by coral reef fishes. Oceanogr Mar Biol 41:279–309

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Logo for assisting with the construction and maintenance of the exclusion fences. The Mahonia Na Dari Research and Conservation Centre, and Walindi Plantation Resort provided logistic support. We declare that the experiments conducted for this study comply with the current laws of Papua New Guinea. This project was supported by a Merit Research Grant and an Australian Research Council Grant to G.P. Jones.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela M. Ceccarelli.

Additional information

Communicated by Christian Koerner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ceccarelli, D.M., Jones, G.P. & McCook, L.J. Foragers versus farmers: contrasting effects of two behavioural groups of herbivores on coral reefs. Oecologia 145, 445–453 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0144-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0144-y

Keywords

Navigation