A performance comparison of k₀-based ENAA and NAA in the (K, Th, U) radiation dose rate assessment for the luminescence dating of sediments

Summary

Recently, in our laboratory an intercomparison was made of methods for the annual radiation dose determination (assessed from direct radiation counting and/or from the measurement of the K, Th and U contents) applied to luminescence dating of loess and sand sediment, whereby the emphasis was put on their precision and accuracy. Although these properties are important, the duration of the measurement is also a practically relevant aspect. Indeed, direct alpha, beta and gamma-counting can last a week or more, and the determination of K, Th and U via NAA can take up to three weeks to enable proper gamma-ray spectrometry of the long-lived ²³³ Th/²³³Pa. Therefore, in the present work the performance of k₀-based epiCd-NAA (ENAA, with irradiation under a cadmium cover) when applied to sediments is compared to k₀-NAA. As concluded, with the use of k₀-ENAA the analysis turnaround time could be considerably reduced from ~3 weeks to ~ 2.5days, while maintaining satisfactory accuracy, precision and determination sensitivity.