Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structure, mechanical properties and surface morphology of the snapping shrimp claw

  • Biomaterials
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The snapping shrimp preys by rapidly closing its snapping claw to generate a fast water jet, creating a shockwave that bombards the nearby prey and other shrimp. This behaviour has led to considerable interest and research. However, the structure, surface morphology and mechanical properties of the snapping claw are unreported. We used a combination of techniques including scanning electron microscopy and nanoindentation to characterise the claw. These measurements were coupled with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to understand how the microstructure contributes to drag reduction. We found that cone-shaped micropapillae, rhombic dents and short straight stripes were hierarchically distributed on the surface of the claw. CFD simulation showed that the micropapillae units changed the interaction between the turbulent and the wall from sliding friction to rolling friction, resulting in tire-shaped vortices. This also reduced the turbulent kinetic energy in the near-wall region, thereby contributing to drag reduction. The cross section of the claw revealed four layers comprising an epicuticle, exocuticle, endocuticle and a membranous layer. The exocuticle is composed of chitin fibres arranged vertically in a lamellar fashion and the endocuticle has a Bouligand-type structure. This special structure provides the snapping shrimp with good mechanical resistance during rapid closure. Both modulus and hardness decreased from the outermost epicuticle to the innermost membranous layer. The gradient modulus and hardness may help to suppress microcracks at the interfaces between different layers. The findings improve our understanding of the unique mechanism of the snapping claw and may lead to the development of novel biomimetic materials with enhanced drag reduction, impact and crack resistance properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Versluis M, Schimitz B, Von der Heydt A, Lohse D (2000) How snapping shrimp snap: through cavitating bubbles. Science 289:2114–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herberholz J, Schmitz B (1999) Flow visualization and high speed video analysis of water jets in the snapping shrimp (Alpheus heterochaelis). J Comp Physiol A 185:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schmiz B, Herberholz J (1998) Snapping movements and laser doppler anemometry analysis of water jets in the snapping shrimp Alpheus heterochaelis. In: Proceedings of the 26th Gottingen Neurobiol. Conf. 2: 241

  4. Schmiz B, Herberholz J (1998) Snapping behavior in intraspecific agonistic encounters in the sanpping shirmp (Alpheus heterochaelis). J Biosci 23:623–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lohse D, Schmitz B, Versluis M (2001) Snapping shrimp make flashing bubbles. Nature 413:477–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ritzman RE (1974) Mechanisms for the snapping behavior of two Alpheid shrimp, Alpheus californiensis and Alpheus heterochelis. J Comp Physiol 95(3):217–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown Kathryn (2000) For certain shrimp, life’s a snap. Science 289:2020–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Au WWL, Banks K (1998) The acoustics of the snapping shrimp Synalpheus parneomeris in Kaneohe Bay. J Acoust Soc Am 103:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Epifanio CL, Potter JR, Deane GB, Readhead ML, Buckingham MJ (1999) Imaging in the ocean with ambient noise: the ORB experiments. J Acoust Soc Am 106(6):3211–3225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McNamara WB, Didenko YT, Suslick KS (1999) Sonoluminescence temperatures during multi-bubble cavitation. Nature 401:772–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schultz S, Wuppermann K, Schmitz B (1998) Behavioural interactions of snapping shrimp (Alpheus heterochaelis) with conspecifics and sympatric crabs (Eurypanopeus depressus). Zool Anal Complex Syst (Suppl I) 101:85

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaji T, Anker A, Wirkner CS, Palmer AR (2018) Parallel saltational evolution of ultrafast movements in snapping shrimp claws. Curr Biol 28:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen PY, Lin AY, McKittrick J, Meyers MA (2008) Structure and mechanical properties of crab exoskeletons. Acta Biomater 4:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (2004) Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J Mater Res 19(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shu S, Lu J, Li D (2007) A systematic study of the validation of Oliver and Pharr’s method. J Mater Res 22(12):3385–3396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koutsourakis N, Bartzis JG, Markatos NC (2012) Evaluation of Reynolds stress, k-ε, and RNG k-ε, turbulence models in street canyon flows using various experimental datasets. Environ Fluid Mech 12:379–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coirier WJ, Fricker DM, Furmanczyk M, Kim S (2005) A computational fluid dynamics approach for urban area transport and dispersion modeling. Environ Fluid Mech 5:443–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan TL, Dong G, Leung CW, Cheung CS, Hung WT (2002) Validation of a two-dimensional pollutant dispersion model in an isolated street canyon. Atmos Environ 36:861–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Girault V, Raviart PA (1986) Finite element methods for Navier-Stokes equations: theory and algorithms, vol 87. Springer, Berlin, pp 167–204

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin S, Bhushan B (2016) Modeling and optimization of shark-inspired riblet geometries for low drag applications. J Colloid Interface Sci 474:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pu X, Li G, Liu Y (2016) Progress and perspective of studies on biomimetic shark skin drag reduction. ChemBioEng Rev 3:26–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen HW, Zhang X, Ma LX, Che D, Zhang DY, Sudarshan TS (2014) Investigation on large-area fabrication of vivid shark skin with superior surface functions. Appl Surf Sci 316:124–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bixler GD, Bhushan B (2013) Fluid drag reduction with shark-skin riblet inspired microstructured surfaces. Adv Funct Mater 23:4507–4528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dean B, Bhushan B (2010) Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulentflow: a review. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 368:4775–4806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bixler GD, Bhushan B (2013) Shark skin inspired low-drag microstructured surfaces in closed channel flow. J Colloid Interface Sci 393:384–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Afroz F, Lang A, Habegger ML, Motta P, Hueter R (2016) Experimental study of laminar and turbulent boundary layer separation control of shark skin. Bioinspir Biomim 12(1):016009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Afroz F, Sharif MA, Lang A (2016) Numerical study of adverse pressure gradient generation over a flat plate using a rotating cylinder. J Fluids Struct 62:187–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lang AW, Jones EM, Afroz F (2017) Separation control over a grooved surface inspired by dolphin skin. Bioinspir Biomim 12:026005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu E, Li L, Wang G, Zeng Z, Zhao W, Xue Q (2017) Drag reduction through self-texturing compliant bionic materials. Sci Rep 7:40038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Fish FE (2006) The myth and reality of Gray’s paradox: implication of dolphin drag reduction for technology. Bioinspir Biomim 1:R17–R25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gad-el-Hak M (2002) Compliant coatings for drag reduction. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bandyopadhyay PR, Hellum AM (2014) Modeling how shark and dolphin skin patterns control transitional wall-turbulence vorticity patterns using spatiotemporal phase reset mechanisms. Sci Rep 4:6650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Weaver JC, Milliron GW, Miserez A, Evans-Lutterodt K, Herrera S, Gallana I, Mershon WJ, Swanson B, Zavattieri P, DiMasi E, Kisailus D (2012) The stomatopod dactyl club: a formidable damage-tolerant biological hammer. Science 336:1275–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bouligand Y (1972) Twisted fibrous arrangements in biological materials and cholesteric mesophases. Tissue Cell 4:189–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weiner S, Addadi L (1997) Design strategies in mineralized biological materials. J Mater Chem 7:689–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang RG, Zaheri A, Gao W, Hayashi C, Espinosa HD (2017) AFM identification of beetle exocuticle: bouligand structure and nanofiber anisotropic elastic properties. Adv Funct Mater 27:1603993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yaraghi NA, Guarín-Zapata N, Grunenfelder LK, Hintsala E, Bhowmick S, Hiller JM, Betts M, Principe EL, Jung JY, Sheppard L, Wuhrer R, McKittrick J, Zavattieri PD, Kisailus D (2016) A sinusoidally architected helicoidal biocomposite. Adv Mater 28:6835–6844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zimmermann EA, Gludovatz B, Schaible E, Dave NK, Yang W, Meyers MA, Ritchie RO (2013) Mechanical adaptability of the Bouligand-type structure in natural dermal armour. Nat Commun 4:2634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen PY, Lin AY, Lin YS, Seki Y, Stokes AG, Peyras J, Olevsky EA, Meyers MA, Mckittrick J (2008) Structure and mechanical properties of selected biological materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1:208–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lian J, Wang J (2014) Microstructure and mechanical anisotropy of crab cancer magister exoskeletons. Exp Mech 54:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Raabe D, Sachs C, Romano P (2005) The crustacean exoskeleton as an example of a structurally and mechanically graded biological nanocomposite material. Acta Mater 53:4281–4292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Suresh S (2001) Graded materials for resistance to contact deformation and damage. Science 292(5526):2447–2451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Labonte D, Lenz AK, Oyen ML (2017) On the relationship between indentation hardness and modulus, and the damage resistance of biological materials. Acta Biomater 57(15):373–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yu W, Blanchard JP (1996) An elastic-plastic indentation model and its solutions. J Mater Res 11(09):2358–2367

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51675222 & 51475202), the project on scientific and technological cooperation between China and Italy (No. 2016YFE0103700), the science and technology development planning project of Jilin Province (20180101068JC) and the program for JLU Science and Technology Innovative Research Team. RA is grateful to Jilin University for providing a travel scholarship (111 project) for research collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Bionic Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun, 130022, People’s Republic of China

    Zhihui Qian, Mingming Yang, Liang Zhou, Jing Liu, Chunbao Liu, Yan Liu, Luquan Ren & Lei Ren

  2. Centre for Materials and Structures, School of Engineering, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3GH, UK

    Riaz Akhtar

  3. School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK

    Lei Ren

Authors
  1. Zhihui Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mingming Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liang Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Riaz Akhtar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chunbao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Luquan Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Lei Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chunbao Liu or Lei Ren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, Z., Yang, M., Zhou, L. et al. Structure, mechanical properties and surface morphology of the snapping shrimp claw. J Mater Sci 53, 10666–10678 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2364-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-2364-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation