Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How farmers’ non-agricultural employment affects rural land circulation in China?

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To clarify the impact of non-agricultural employment on rural land circulation in China, we built logit models using the Chinese Household Income Project 2013 dataset, which includes 18,948 household samples over 15 provinces, 126 cities and 234 counties of China in 2013. We use the proportion of non-agricultural income, the proportion of non-agricultural laborers and non-agricultural fixed operating assets to reflect the degree of the households’ dependence on agriculture, the degree of the households’ laborers committed to non-agricultural employment and the stability of non-agricultural employment, respectively. The results show that the stability of non-agricultural employment is an important reason for farmers to transfer out their land, and an increase in non-agricultural income is the fundamental reason. The proportion of non-agricultural assets has the greatest impact on the decision to transfer land, followed by the proportion of non-agricultural income. Per unit increase in the non-agricultural income ratio has a stronger effect on the transfer-out decision than it does on the transfer-in decision, which is a 0.09 increase of the probability of transfer- out the land and a 0.07 decrease of the probability of transfer-in the land. In terms of regional differences, when considering the impact of non-agricultural employment on the land transfer-out decision, the impacts of non-agricultural income and labor force are the greatest in the Central region. The impact of non-agricultural assets is the greatest in the Eastern region. For the Eastern region, the decision to transfer out land is mainly affected by non-agricultural assets and the non-agricultural labor force, and the decision to transfer in land is mainly affected by non-agricultural assets. In the Central and Western regions, the decision to transfer out land is mainly affected by non-agricultural assets, non-agricultural income and the non-agricultural labor force, in that order. The decision to transfer in land in the Central region is not significantly affected by non-agricultural employment. The decision to transfer in land in the Western region is mainly affected by non-agricultural assets, non-agricultural labor force and non-agricultural income, in that order. We note that non-agricultural assets have a prominent impact on land transfer, which shows that the stability of non-agricultural employment has an important impact on land transfer decision- making. Vocational training for rural labor forces may be an effective means to promote stable non-agricultural employment and simultaneously facilitate rural land circulation, especially in Central and Western China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bao Z S, Xu Z M, Gao S et al., 2009. Regional differences of land circulation and driving forces: A case study of Jiangsu Province. Chinese Rural Economy, (4): 23–47. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy A, Mcgrath B, 2015. Farm, place and identity construction among Irish farm youth who migrate. Journal of Rural Studies, 37: 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Che Y, 2014. Mismatch: Land reallocations, recovery land rental and land rental market development in rural China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 6(2): 229–247 (219). (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H L, Shi Q H, Gu H Y, 2014. Is land circulation efficient? A case study of Shanxi Province. Chinese Rural Economy, (7): 61–71. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y Q, 2010. Agricultural land use responses to the rising labor opportunity cost in Sui county, China. Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 8(4): 10–18. (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y Q, Li X B, Zhu H Y et al., 2010. Agricultural land use responses to increasing labor opportunity cost in Suixian county of Henan province. Progress in Geography, 29(9): 1067–1074. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi Y J, 2001. Rural labor flows in China (review). China Review International, 8(2): 578–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger K, Jin S, 2005. The potential of land rental markets in the process of economic development: Evidence from China. Journal of Development Economics, 78(1): 241–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deininger K, Jin S, Berhanu A et al., 2001. Mechanisms for land transfer in Ethiopia: Implications for efficiency, equity and non-farm development. Ethiopian Journal of Economics, 10: 21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F, 2006. Peasant Economics: Peasant Household Agricultural and Agriculture Development. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egyei R K, Harrison P, Adzovor Y, 2013. Household non-farm income: Any influence on agricultural productivity in rural Ghana? Developing Country Studies, 3(9): 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng S, 2008. Land rental, off-farm employment and technical efficiency of farm households in Jiangxi Province, China. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 55(4): 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng S, Heerink N, Ruben R et al., 2010. Land rental market, off-farm employment and agricultural production in Southeast China: A plot-level case study. China Economic Review, 21(4): 598–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao L L, Huang J K, 2011. The relationship between different types of circulated agricultural land and household investment. Chinese Rural Economy, (4): 9–17. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Zhong F N, 2011. The impacts of remained land after labor outflow on local farmers’s income distribution. Chinese Rural Economy, (4): 18–25. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao H G, Li X B, Xin L J, 2017. Impacts of non-farm employment of rural laborers on agricultural land use: Theoretical analysis and its policy implications. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(6): 595–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden S, Shiferaw B, Pender J, 2004. Non-farm income, household welfare, and sustainable land management in a less-favoured area in the Ethiopian highlands. Food Policy, 29(4): 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Gao L, Rozelle S, 2012. The effect of off-farm employment on the decisions of households to rent out and rent in cultivated land in China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 4(1): 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang J, Wu Y, Rozelle S, 2009. Moving off the farm and intensifying agricultural production in Shandong: A case study of rural labor market linkages in China. Agricultural Economics, 40(2): 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z H, Wang P, 2008. Farmland transfer and its impacts on the development of modern agriculture: Status, problems and solutions. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 38(2): 38–47. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huy H T, Lyne M, Ratna N et al., 2016. Drivers of transaction costs affecting participation in the rental market for cropland in Vietnam. Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 60(3): 476–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Q Y, 2012. A study on the relationship between Chinese rural land transfer and non-farm income [D]. Jinan: Shandong University of Finance and Economics. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawasaki K, 2010. The costs and benefits of land fragmentation of rice farms in Japan. Australian Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 54(4): 509–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawasaki K, 2011. The impact of land fragmentation on rice production cost and input use. Japanese Journal of Rural Economics, 13: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kung J K S, Lee Y F, 2001. So what if there is income inequality? The distributive consequence of nonfarm employment in rural China. Economic Development & Cultural Change, 50(1): 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low A, 1986. Agricultural Development in Southern Africa: Farm Household Economics and the Food Crisis. London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latruffe L, Piet L, 2013. Does land fragmentation affect farm performance? Agricultural Systems, 129: 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin J Y, 1992. Rural reforms and agricultural growth in China. American Economic Review, 82(1): 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Qu F T, Jin J et al., 2008. Impact of land fragmentation and land transfer on farmer’s land use efficiency. Resources Science, 30(10): 1511–1516. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y X, Xu H Z, 2016. Influence of farmland right to rural land circulation: Based on the perspective of farmers differentiation. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 30(5): 25–29. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma X L, Qiu T W, Qian Z H, 2015. Farmland property and land market participation of rural households: An Empirical Analysis of Jiangsu, Hubei, Guangxi and Heilongjiang provinces, China. Chinese Rural Economy, (2): 22–37. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manjunatha A V, Anik A R, Speelman S et al., 2013. Impact of land fragmentation, farm size, land ownership and crop diversity on profit and efficiency of irrigated farms in India. Land Use Policy, 31: 397–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), 1996–2013. China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC), 2006–2014. Compilation of Cost-Benefit Data of National Agricultural Products. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Niroula G S, Thapa G B, 2007. Impacts of land fragmentation on input use, crop yield and production efficiency in the mountains of Nepal. Land Degradation & Development, 18(3): 237–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for Fixed Rural Observation Villages (OFROV) of Policy Research Department of Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and Ministry of Agriculture, 2001. National Rural Social-economic Survey Data Collection, 1986–1999. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Office for Fixed Rural Observation Villages of Policy Research Department of Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party and Ministry of Agriculture, 2010. National Fixed Rural Observation Villages Data Compilation, 2000–2009. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Penov I, 2004. The use of irrigation water in Bulgaria’s Plovdiv region during transition. Environmental Management, 34(2): 304–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer L, Lopez-Feldman A, Taylor J E, 2010. Is off-farm income reforming the farm? Evidence from Mexico. Agricultural Economics, 40(2): 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgaard S B, Birch T, 2013. Should I stay or should I go? Rural youth employment in Uganda and Zambia. International Development Planning Review, 35(2): 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian Z H, Mou Y, 2012. Regional difference of land marketization in China. Jiangsu Social Sciences, (4): 45–53. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh I, Squire L, Strauss J, 1986. Agricultural Household Models: Extensions, Applications, and Policy. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan M H, Guy M R, Li X B et al., 2013. Spatial and temporal variability of farm size in China in context of rapid urbanization. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(5): 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan S, Heerink N, Kruseman G et al., 2008. Do fragmented landholdings have higher production costs? Evidence from rice farmers in northeastern Jiangxi province, P.R. China. China Economic Review, 19(3): 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan S H, Qu F T, Heerink N, 2003. Causes of land fragmentation and driving forces. China Rural Survey, (6): 24–30. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y J, Li X B, Xin L J et al., 2009. Impacts of the rise of labor opportunity cost on agricultural land use changes: A case study of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. Journal of Natural Resources, 24(3): 369–377. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Todorova S A, Lulcheva D, 2006. Economic and social effects of land fragementation on Bulgarian agriculture. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 6(4): 555–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C C, Yang Y S, 2011. Impact of rural households’ nonfarm employment on cropland transfer: Case of Changting county in Fujian Province, China. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 31(11): 1362–1367. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie H L, Lu H, 2017. Impact of land fragmentation and non-agricultural labor supply on circulation of agricultural land management rights. Land Use Policy, 68: 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu H Z, Guo Y Y, 2011. Co-integration test and causality analysis on the relationship between farmers’ Non-agricultural income and farmland transfer. China Population, Resources and Environment, 21(6): 61–66. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan X, Huo X, 2016. Drivers of household entry and intensity in land rental market in rural China: Evidence from North Henan Province. China Agricultural Economic Review, 8(2): 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y, 2000. The development of the land lease market in rural China. Land Economics, 76(2): 252–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin X H, Tian C H, 2016. The impact of land markets on farmers’ income in China. China Real Estate, (5): 29–41. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Zhou H C, 2017. Off-farm employment, insurance selection and land transfer. China Land Sciences, 31(10): 42–52. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H Y, Li X B, Xin L J, 2007. Intensity change in cultivated land use in China and its policy implications. Journal of Natural Resources, 22(6): 907–915. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China

    Jiayue Wang & Liangjie Xin

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Jiayue Wang

  3. School of Geographical Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, China

    Yahui Wang

Authors
  1. Jiayue Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liangjie Xin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yahui Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liangjie Xin.

Additional information

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.41571095; National Key Basic Research Program of China, No.2015CB452702

Author: Wang Jiayue, PhD Candidate, specialized in land use change and its effects.

Xin Liangjie, Associate Professor, specialized in land use change and its effects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, J., Xin, L. & Wang, Y. How farmers’ non-agricultural employment affects rural land circulation in China?. J. Geogr. Sci. 30, 378–400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1733-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1733-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation