Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New spatial dimensions of global cityscapes: From reviewing existing concepts to a conceptual spatial approach

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current global urbanisation processes are leading to new forms of massive urban constellations. The conceptualisations and classifications of these, however, are often ambiguous, overlap or lag behind in scientific literature. This article examines whether there is a common denominator to define and delimitate–and ultimately map–these new dimensions of cityscapes. In an extensive literature review we analysed and juxtaposed some of the most common concepts such as megacity, megaregion or megalopolis. We observed that many concepts are abstract or unspecific, and for those concepts for which physical parameters exist, the parameters are neither properly defined nor used in standardised ways. While understandably concepts originate from various disciplines, the authors identify a need for more precise definition and use of parameters. We conclude that often, spatial patterns of large urban areas resemble each other considerably but the definitions vary so widely that these differences may surpass any inconsistencies in the spatial delimitation process. In other words, today we have tools such as earth observation data and Geographic Information Systems to parameterise if clear definitions are provided. This appears not to be the case. The limiting factor when delineating large urban areas seems to be a commonly agreed ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anas A, Arnott R, Small K A, 1997. Urban Spatial Structure. The University of California Transportation Center, Working Paper No. 357. Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angel S, 2012. Planet of Cities. Cambridge MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antikainen J, 2005. The concept of functional urban area. Findings on the ESPON project 1.1.1. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 7: 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aziz N A, Hadi A S, 2007. Linking urban form to a liveable city. Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 8: 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baigent E, 2004. Patrick Geddes, Lewis Mumford and Jean Gottmann: Divisions over ‘megalopolis’. Progress in Human Geography, 28(6): 687–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey N, Turok I, 2001. Central Scotland as a polycentric urban region: Useful planning concept or chimera? Urban Studies, 38(4): 697–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee T, 2009. Megaregions or megasprawls? Issues of density, urban design, and quality growth. In: Ross C L (ed.). Megaregions: Planning for Global Competitiveness. Washington, Covelon, London: Island Press, 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banister D, Watson S, Wood C, 1997. Sustainable cities: Transport, energy, and urban form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24(1): 125–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomé E, Belward A S, 2005. GLC2000: A new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(9): 1959–1977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten D F, 1995. Network cities: Creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century. Urban Studies, 32: 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaverstock J V, Smith R G, Taylor P J, 1999. A roster of world cities. Cities, 16(6): 445–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengs C, Schmidt-Thomé K, 2006. Urban-rural relations in Europe. EPSON Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta B, 2010. Analysis of Urban Growth and Sprawl from Remote Sensing Data. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T, Hay G J, Weng Q et al., 2011. Collective sensing: Integrating geospatial technologies to understand urban systems: An overview. Remote Sensing, 3(8): 1743–1776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet M G, Crane R, 2001. Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Form on Travel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bontemps S, Defourny P, Bogaert E V et al., 2011. GLOBCOVER 2009: Products Description and Validation Report. Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL) & European Space Agency (ESA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau-Lepage L, Huriot J M, 2006. Megacities vs Global Cities. Development and Institutions. ERSA conference papers. European Regional Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breheny M J, 1992. Sustainable Development and Urban Form. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkhoff T, 2013. Major Agglomerations of the World. http://www.citypopulation.de (accessed 16. Apr. 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N, 2013. Theses on urbanization. Public Culture, 25(1): 85–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N, Schmid C, 2014. The ‘Urban Age’ in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3): 731–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronger D, Trettin L, 2011. Megastädte, Global Cities HEUTE: das Zeitalter Asiens?–Asien–Wirtschaft und Entwicklung, Bd. 5. Berlin, Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M, 1989. The Informational City. Information, Technology, Economic Restructuring and the Urban-Regional Process. Oxford: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M, 2002. Local and global: Cities in the network society. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93(5): 548–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion A G, 2001. A changing demographic regime and evolving poly centric urban regions: Consequences for the size, composition and distribution of city populations. Urban Studies, 38(4): 657–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion A, 2011. The changing nature of urban and rural areas in the United Kingdom and other European countries. In: UN-DESA, 2011a. Population Distribution, Urbanization, Internal Migration and Development: An International Perspective. United Nations Publication, 144–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman D, Pratt D, Larkham P et al., 2003. Concepts and definitions of corridors: Evidence from England’s Midlands. Journal of Transport Geography, 11(3): 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen N Y, Heligman L, 1994. Growth of the world’s megalopolises. In: Fuchs R J, Brennan E, Chamie J et al. (eds.). Mega-city Growth and the Future. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe S C, 1996. The evolving urban system in North-East Asia. In: Lo F C, Yeung Y M (eds.). Emerging World Cities in Pacific Asia. Tokyo: UNU Press, 498–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choe S C, 1998. Urban corridors in Pacific Asia. In: Lo F C, Yeung Y M (eds.). Globalization and the World of Large Cities. Tokyo: UNU Press, 155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis C, 2006. Network City: Retrofitting the Perth Metropolitan Region to facilitate sustainable travel. Urban Policy and Research, 24(2): 159–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S, 2003. EUROPEAN BRIEFING: Polycentricity in European spatial planning: From an analytical tool to a normative agenda. European Planning Studies, 11(8): 979–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davoudi S, 2006. The northern way: A polycentric megalopolis. In: Shutt J, Henderson R, Johnson S (eds.). Essays on the Yorkshire and Humber Region. Researching Local and Regional Development. A Leeds Metropolitan University Research Report. Leeds, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado E, Epstein D, Joo Y et al., 2006. Methods for Planning the Great Lakes MegaRegion. Ann Arbor: Urban and Regional Planning Program, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derudder B, Witlox F, 2005. An appraisal of the use of airline data in assessing the world city network: A research note on data. Urban Studies, 42(13): 2371–2388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman F M, Faludi A, 1998. Polynucleated metropolitan regions in Northwest Europe: Theme of the Special Issue. European Planning Studies, 6(4): 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra L, 2009. Metropolitan regions in the EU. Regional Focus Series 01/2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doll C N, Muller J P, Morley J G, 2006. Mapping regional economic activity from night-time light satellite imagery. Ecological Economics, 57(1): 75–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglass M, 2000. Mega-urban regions and world city formation: Globalisation, the economic crisis and urban policy issues in Pacific Asia. Urban Studies, 37(12): 2315–2335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC, 1999. Sixth Periodic Report on Social and Economic Situation and Development of Regions in the EU. European Commission, Brussels.

  • EC, 2004. Urban Audit. Methodological Handbook. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  • EEA, 2013. Urban Atlas. Available online: www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/urban-atlas (accessed 16. Apr. 2015).

  • Elvidge C D, Imhoff M L, Baugh K E et al., 2001. Night-time lights of the world: 1994–1995. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 56(2): 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elvidge C D, Tuttle B T, Sutton P C et al., 2007. Global distribution and density of constructed impervious surfaces. Sensors, 7(9): 1962–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESPON, 2011. LUZ Specifications (Urban Audit 2004). Technical Report.

  • Esch T, Taubenböck H, Roth A et al., 2012. TanDEM-X mission: New perspectives for the inventory and monitoring of global settlement patterns. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 6(1): 061702–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat, 2013. European cities: Spatial dimension. Available online: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/European_cities_-_spatial_dimension (accessed 16. Apr. 2015).

  • Ewing R, 1997. Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63(1): 107–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Pendall R, Chen D, 2002. Measuring sprawl and its impact. Smart Growth America. Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett C B, 1932. Distribution of the Urban Population in Great Britain, 1931. The Geographical Journal, 79(2): 100–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feranec J, Solin L, Kopecka M et al., 2014. Analysis and expert assessment of the semantic similarity between land cover classes. Progress in Physical Geography, online first. 0309133314532001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firman T, Dharmapatni I A I, 2007. The emergence of extended metropolitan regions in Indonesia: Jabotabek and Bandung Metropolitan Area. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 7(2): 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, 2006. The new megalopolis. Our focus on cities is wrong. Growth and innovation come from new urban corridors. Newsweek International Edition, 3 July 2006, Special Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, Gulden T, Mellander C, 2007. The rise of the mega-region. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(3): 459–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank L D, Engelke P O, 2001. The built environment and human activity patterns: Exploring the impacts of urban form on public health. Journal of Planning Literature, 16(2): 202–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey H, 1999. Designing the City: Towards a More Sustainable Urban Form. London: E&FN Spon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J, 1986. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change, 17(1): 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J, 1995. Where we stand: a decade of world city research. In: Knox P L, Taylor P J (eds). World Cities in a World-System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 21–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J, Miller J, 1965. The urban field. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4): 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J, Wolff G, 1982. World city formation: An agenda for research and action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6(3): 309–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galster G, Hanson R, Ratcliffe M R et al., 2001. Wrestling sprawl to the ground: Defining and measuring an elusive concept. Housing Policy Debate, 12(4): 681–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garreau J, 1991. Edge City: Life on the New Frontier. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • GaWC, 2010. The World According to GaWC 2010 (http://www.lboro.ac.uk/gawc/world2010t.htm; accessed 16. Apr. 2015).

  • Geddes P, 1915. Cities in Evolution. An Introduction to the Town Planning Movement and to the Study of Civics. London: Williams & Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert A, 1998. World cities and the urban future: The view from Latin America. In: Lo Fu-chen, Yue-man Yeung (eds.). Globalization and the World of Large Cities. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 174–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg N, 1991. Extended metropolitan regions in Asia: A new spatial paradigm. In: Ginsburg N, Koppel B, McGee T G (eds.). The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Kahn M, 2003. Sprawl and Urban Growth. NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 9733. Cambridge, MA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein S, 1994. Demographic issues and data needs for mega-city research. In: Fuchs R J, Brennan E, Chamie J et al. (eds.). Mega-city Growth and the Future. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 32–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J, 1957. Megalopolis or the urbanization of the northeastern seaboard. Economic Geography, 189–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J, 1961. Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann J, 1976. Megalopolitan systems around the world. Ekistics, 243(2): 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain Historical GIS Project (GBHGISP), 2004. ‘Great Britain Historical GIS’. University of Portsmouth (available from: visionofbritain.org.uk/text/chap_page.jsp?t_id=Cen_Guide&c_id=19&show=AL, accessed 16. Apr. 2015).

  • Green N, 2007. Functional polycentricity: A formal definition in terms of social network analysis. Urban Studies, 44(11): 2077–2103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halbert L, Pain K, Thierstein A, 2006. European polycentricity and emerging Mega-City-Regions: ‘One size fits all’ policy? Built Environment, 32(2): 194–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hales M, Mendoza Peña A, 2012. 2012 Global Cities Index and Emerging Cities Outlook. A.T. Kearney and The Chicago Council on Global Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, 1998. Globalization and the world cities. In: Lo Fu-chen, Yeung Yue-man (eds.). Globalization and the World of Large Cities. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, 2009a. Looking backward, looking forward: The city region of the mid-21st century. Regional Studies, 43(6): 803–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, 2009b. The future of cities. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23(3): 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall P, Pain K, 2006. From metropolis to polyopolis. In: Hall P, Pain K (eds.). The Polycentric Metropolis: Learning from Mega-city Regions in Europe. London & Sterling, VA: Earthscan, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy S, 1996. Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 1(2): 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen M C, DeFries R S, Townshend J R et al., 2000. Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6/7): 1331–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse J E, Lathrop R G, 2003. Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Applied Geography, 23(2): 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospers G-J, 2002. Beyond the blue banana? Structural change in Europe’s geo-economy. ERSA Conference Papers, European Regional Science Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • IKM (Initiativkreis Europäische Metropolregionen in Deutschland) & Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR) im Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung (BBR) (eds.), 2010. Regionales Monitoring 2010. Daten und Karten zu den Europäischen Metropolregionen in Deutschland. Bonn, Mannheim.

  • Jagadisan S, Fookes T W, 2009. Extending the scope and methodology of Ekistic theory and practice–Part 1: Introduction. - Research Memorandum 09/1. Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson M, 1939. The law of the primate city. Geographical Review, 29(2): 226–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenks M, Burton E, Williams K (eds.), 2004. The Compact City: A Sustainable Urban Form? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloosterman R C, Musterd S, 2001. The polycentric urban region: Towards a research agenda. Urban Studies, 38(4): 623–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox P L, 1995. World cities in a world-system. In: Knox P L, Taylor P J (eds). World Cities in a World-System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–20.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kraas F, 2007. Megacities and global change: Key priorities. The Geographical Journal, 173(1): 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraas F, 2010. Stadt und Land im Fluss: Lebensräume. Transformationsprozesse im “urban fringe” der Megastädte Asiens. In: Forschungsschule A R T E S. (ed.). A.R.T.E.S. Jahrbuch. Berichtzeitraum Oktober 2008 - Februar 2010. Köln, 85–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraas F, Mertins G, 2008. Megastädte in Entwicklungsländern: Vulnerabilität, Informalität, Regier- und Steuerbarkeit. Geographische Rundschau, 60(11): 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraas F, Nitschke U, 2008. Megaurbanisierung in Asien–Entwicklungsprozesse und Konsequenzen stadträumlicher Reorganisation. Themenheft “Raum-und Stadtentwicklung in Asien”. Informationen zur Raumentwicklung, 8: 447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzmann K R, 1998. World city regions in Europe: Structural change and future challenges. In: Lo F C, Yeung Y-M (eds.). Globalization and the World of Large Cities. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 37–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambooy J G, 1998. Polynucleation and economic development: The Randstad. European Planning Studies, 6(4): 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang R E, 2003. Edgeless Cities: Exploring the Elusive Metropolis. Washington: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang R E, Dhavale D, 2005. Beyond Megalopolis: Exploring America’s New “Megapolitan” Geography. Alexandria, VA: Metropolitan Institute, Virginia Technical University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang R E, Nelson A C, 2007. Beyond the Metroplex: Examining Commuter Patterns at the “Megapolitan” Scale. Working Paper. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laquian A, 1994. Social and welfare impacts of mega-city development. In: Fuchs R J, Brennan E, Chamie J et al., (eds.). Mega-city Growth and the Future. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 192–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laquian A, 2005. Beyond Metropolis: The Planning and Governance of Asia’s Mega Urban Regions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laquian A, 2011. The planning and governance of Asia’s mega-urban regions. In: UN-DESA, 2011. Population Distribution, Urbanization, Internal Migration and Development: An International Perspective. United Nations Publication, 302––22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P F, 1983. The galactic metropolis. In: Platt R H, Macinko G. Beyond the Urban Fringe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 23–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Cao X-S, 2005. Evolution and development of Guangzhou-Hong Kong Corridor. Chinese Geographical Science, 15(3): 206–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, He C, Zhou Y et al., 2014. How much of the world’s land has been urbanized, really? A hierarchical framework for avoiding confusion. Landscape Ecology, 29(5): 763–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo F-C, Marcotullio P J, 2001. Globalization and urban transformations in the Asia Pacific region. In: Lo F-C, Marcotullio P J (eds.). Globalization and the Sustainability of Cities in the Asia Pacific Region. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 21–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveland T R, 2000. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 21(6/7): 1303–1330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masini E B, 1994. Impacts of mega-city growth on families and households. In: Fuchs R J, Brennan E, Chamie J et al., (eds.). Mega-city Growth and the Future. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press, 215–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee T G, 1991. The emergence of Desakota regions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis. In: Ginsburg N, Koppel B, McGee T G (eds.). The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee T G, Robinson I M (eds.), 1995. The Mega-Urban Regions of Southeast Asia. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath B, Pickett S T A, 2011. The metacity: A conceptual framework for integrating ecology and urban design. Challenges, 2(4): 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki H, Shao X, Iwao K et al., 2012. An automated method for global urban area mapping by integrating ASTER satellite images and GIS data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(2): 1004–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison Institute (MI), 2008. Megapolitan Arizona’s Sun Corridor. Morrison Institute for Public Policy, Arizona State University.

  • Nechyba T J, Walsh R P, 2004. Urban Sprawl. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(4): 177–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman M, 2000. Regional design: Recovering a great landscape architecture and urban planning tradition. Landscape and Urban Planning, 47: 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 2012. Redefining “Urban”: A new way to measure metropolitan areas. OECD Publishing.

  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB), 2013. OMB Bulletin No. 13-01. Available online: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/bulletins/2013/b13-01.pdf (accessed 16. Apr. 2015).

  • Pacione M, 2009. Urban Geography: A Global Perspective. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain K, 2007. Global cities, gateways and corridors: Hierarchies, roles and functions. In: Roundtables and International Conference of Canada’s Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain K, 2011. ‘New Worlds’ for ‘Old’? Twenty-first-century gateways and corridors: Reflections on a European spatial perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(6): 1154–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaresi M, Guo H, Blaes X et al., 2013. A global human settlement layer from optical HR/VHR RS data: Concept and first results. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 6(5): 2102–2131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piacentini M, Rosina K, 2012. Measuring the environmental performance of metropolitan areas with geographic information sources. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2012/05, OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potere D, Schneider A, 2007. A critical look at representations of urban areas in global maps. GeoJournal, 69(1/2): 55–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potere D, Schneider A, 2009. Comparison of global urban maps. In: Gamba P, Herold M (eds.). Global Mapping of Human Settlement: Experiences, Datasets, and Prospects. Boca Raton, London & New York: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratti C, Williams S, Frenchman D et al., 2006. Mobile landscapes: Using location data from cell phones for urban analysis. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(5): 727–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regional Plan Association, 2006. America 2050: A Prospectus. New York.

  • Ross C L, 2008. Megaregions: Literature Review of the Implications for U.S. Infrastructure Investment and Transportation Planning. Georgia: Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S, 1991. The Global City: London, New York, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S, 2005. The global city: Introducing a concept. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 11(2): 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Friedl M A, Potere D, 2010. Mapping global urban areas using MODIS 500-m data: New methods and datasets based on ‘urban ecoregions’. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(8): 1733–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider A, Woodcock C E, 2008. Compact, dispersed, fragmented, extensive? A comparison of urban growth in twenty-five global cities using remotely sensed data, pattern metrics and census information. Urban Studies, 45(3): 659–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwentker W, 2006. Die Megastadt als Problem der Geschichte. In: Schwentker W (ed.). Megastädte im 20. Jahrhundert. Göttingen: Ruprecht Gmbh & Co., 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A J, 2000. Global city-regions and the new world system. Unpublished Paper, Department of Policy Studies and Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A J, 2001. Globalization and the rise of city-regions. European Planning Studies, 9(7): 813–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siedentop S, 2005. Urban sprawl - verstehen, messen, steuern: Ansatzpunkte für ein empirisches Mess-und Evaluationskonzept der urbanen Siedlungsentwicklung. disP-The Planning Review, 41(160): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small C, Elvidge C D, Balk D et al., 2011. Spatial scaling of stable night lights. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(2): 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small C, Pozzi F, Elvidge C D, 2005. Spatial analysis of global urban extent from DMSP-OLS night lights. Remote Sensing of Environment, 96(3): 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soja E, Kanai E, 2007. The urbanization of the world. In: Burdett R (ed.). The Endless City. Phaidon Press Limited, 54–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhira H S, Ramachandra T V, 2007. Characterising urban sprawl from remote sensing data and using landscape metrics. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Iguassu Falls, Brazil, July 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhira H S, Ramachandra T V, Jagadish K S, 2004. Urban sprawl: Metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 5(1): 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton P, Roberts D, Elvidge C et al., 2001. Census from Heaven: An estimate of the global human population using night-time satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(16): 3061–3076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubenböck H, Esch T, Felbier A et al., 2012. Monitoring urbanization in mega cities from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 117: 162–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubenböck H, Wegmann M, Roth A et al., 2009. Urbanization in India: Spatiotemporal analysis using remote sensing data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33(3): 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubenböck H, Wiesner M, Felbier A et al., 2014. New dimensions of urban landscapes: The spatio-temporal evolution from a polynuclei area to a mega-region based on remote sensing data. Applied Geography, 47(2): 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taubenböck H, Wiesner M, 2015. The spatial network of megaregions: Types of connectivity between cities based on settlement patterns derived from EO-data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54: 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor P J, Lang R E, 2004. The shock of the new: 100 concepts describing recent urban change. Environment and Planning A, 36(6): 951–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrens P M, 2008. A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 1(1): 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trip J J, 2003. The corridor as a transport network. In: Zonneveld W, Trip J J (eds.). Megacorridors in North West Europe. Investigating a New Transnational Planning Concept. Housing and Urban Policy Studies, 27. Delft: Delft University Press, 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Y-H, 2005. Quantifying urban form: Compactness versus ‘Sprawl’. Urban Studies, 42(1): 141–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN-DESA, 2011. Population Distribution, Urbanization, Internal Migration and Development: An International Perspective. New York: United Nations Publications.

  • UN-DESA, 2012. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2011 Revision. New York: United Nations Publications. UN-Habitat, 2006. State of the World’s Cities Report 2006/7. London & Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

  • UN-Habitat, 2008a. State of the World’s Cities 2010/2011: Bridging the Urban Divide. London & Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

  • UN-Habitat, 2008b. The State of African Cities 2008. A framework for addressing urban challenges in Africa. Nairobi. UN-Habitat, 2009. Planning Sustainable Cities. Global Report on Human Settlements 2009. London and Sterling, VA: Earthscan.

  • van Houtum H, Lagendijk A, 2001. Contextualising regional identity and imagination in the construction of polycentric urban regions: The cases of the Ruhr area and the Basque country. Urban Studies, 38(4): 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Thünen J H, 1826. Der isolirte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirthschaft und Nationalökonomie oder Untersuchungen über den Einfluß, den die Getreidepreise, der Reichthum des Bodens und die Abgaben auf den Ackerbau ausüben. Hamburg: Perthes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whebell C F, 1969. Corridors: A theory of urban systems. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 59(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue W, Liu Y, Fan P, 2010. Polycentric urban development: The case of Hangzhou. Environment and Planning A, 42(3): 563–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf S, 2007. About Urban Mega Regions: Knowns and Unknowns. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4252. Washington, D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q, Seto K, 2011. Mapping urbanization dynamics at regional and global scales using multi-temporal DMSP/OLS nighttime light data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(9): 2320–2329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geoinformatics, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

    Isabel Georg & Thomas Blaschke

  2. Earth Observation Center (EOC), Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany

    Hannes Taubenböck

Authors
  1. Isabel Georg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Blaschke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hannes Taubenböck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel Georg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Georg, I., Blaschke, T. & Taubenböck, H. New spatial dimensions of global cityscapes: From reviewing existing concepts to a conceptual spatial approach. J. Geogr. Sci. 26, 355–380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1273-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-016-1273-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation