Skip to main content
Log in

Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based ozone total column measurements

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ozone total column (OTC) measurements made in 2009–2012 near St. Petersburg by a Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Peterhof, St. Petersburg State University (SPbSU)), an M-124 filter ozonometer, and a Dobson spectrophotometer (Voeikovo, MGO), as well as measurements made by a spectrometer ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) (onboard the AURA satellite) have been analyzed and compared. Comparisons have been performed both between ensembles of ground-based measurement data, as well as between ground-based and satellite data. It has been shown that the standard deviation for all devices is 2.5–4.5%; here, the FTIR and Dobson instruments measuring the direct sun are in better agreement with OMI than the M-124 ozonometer measuring the zenith-scattered solar radiation as well. A seasonal cycle in discrepancy with amplitude of 1.5% has been detected between two series of OTC measurements made by M-124 and OMI instruments for a total of 850 days. In fall and winter, the ground-based measurements underestimate the OTC values in comparison with satellite data; in spring and summer, the situation is reversed: ground-based data overestimate the OTC values. Also, it has been revealed that FTIR measurements systematically overestimate the OTC values in comparison with other instruments: from 1.4% (for Dobson) to 3.4% (for OMI). Taking into account the spatial and temporal discrepancy of independent ensembles of measurements and an analysis of standard deviations between ground-based and satellite measurement data, the FTIR spectrometer (SPbSU) can be recommended for OTC satellite data validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anton, M., Lopez, M., Vilaplana, J.M., Kroon, M., McPeters, R., Bañón, M., and Serrano, A., Validation of OMI-TOMS and OMI-DOAS total ozone column using five Brewer spectroradiometers at the Iberian peninsula, J. Geophys. Res., 2009, vol. 114, no. D14307. doi 10.1029/2009JD012003

    Google Scholar 

  • Balis, D., Lambert, J.-C., Van Roozendael, M., Spurr, R., Loyola, D., Livschitz, Y., Valks, P., Amiridis, V., Gerard, P., Granville, J., and Zehner, C., Ten years of GOME/ERS2 total ozone data—the new GOME data processor (GDP) version 4.2. Ground-based validation and comparisons with TOMS v7/v8, J. Geophys. Res., 2007, vol. 112, no. D07307. doi 10.1029/2005JD006376

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhartia, P.K., OMI ozone products. Vol. 2. OMI algorithm theoretical basis document, NASA Tech. Pub. Goddard Space Flight Center Rep. no. ATBD-OMI-02, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, A.W., A replacement for the Dobson spectrophotometer, Pure Appl. Geophys., 1973, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 919–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchard, V., Brogniez, C., Auriol, F., Bonnel, B., Lenoble, J., Tanskanen, A., Bojkov, B., and Veefkind, P., Comparison of OMI ozone and UV irradiance data with ground-based measurements at two French sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 2008, no. 8, pp. 4517–4528. http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/4517/2008/

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, G.M.B., Observers’ handbook for the ozone spectrophotometer, Ann. Int. Geophys. Year, V, Part 1, 1957, pp. 46–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gushchin, G.P. and Sokolenko, S.A., New small-size ozonometer M-124 designed for measuring total ozone, in Atmosfernyi ozon. Tr. VI Vses. simp. 15–17 maya 1985 g. (Atmospheric Ozone. Proc. of the VI All-Union Symp., May 15–17, 1985), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1987, pp. 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hase, F., Hannigan, J.W., Coffey, M.T., Goldman, A., Hopfner, M., Jones, N.B., Rinsland, C.P., and Wood, S.W., Intercomparison of retrieval codes used for the analysis of high-resolution, ground-based FTIR measurements, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 2004, no. 87, pp. 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ialongo, I., Casale, G.R., and Siani, A.M., Comparison of total ozone and erythemal UV data from OMI with ground-based measurements at Rome station // Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2008. no. 8. P. 2381–2401. http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/8/2381/2008/

    Google Scholar 

  • Levelt, P., Hilsenrath E., Leppelmeier G., van den Oord, G.H., Bhartia, P., Tamminen, J., Haan, J.F., Veefkind, J.P., Science objectives of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 2006, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1199–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeters, R.D., Bhartia, P.K., Krueger, A.J., Herman, J.R., Wellemeyer, C.G., Seftor, G.J., Jaross, G., Torres, O., Moy, L., Labow, G., Byerly, W., Taylor, S.L., Swissler, T., and Cebula, R.P., Earth probe Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) data products user’s guide, NASA Tech. Pub. Goddard Space Flight Center Rep. no. 1998-206895, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeters, R.D., Kroon, M., Labow, G., Brinksma, E.J., Balis, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Veefkind, J.P., Bhartia, P.K., and Levelt, P.F., Validation of the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument total column ozone product, J. Geophys. Res., 2008, vol. 113, no. D15S14. doi 10.1029/2007JD008802

    Google Scholar 

  • Perov, S.P. and Khrgian, A.Kh., Sovremennye problemy atmosfernogo ozona (Current Problems of Atmospheric Ozone), Leningrad: Gidrometeoizdat, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poberovskii, A.V., High-resolution ground measurements of the IR Spectra of solar radiation, Atmos. Oceanic Opt., 2010, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 161–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalamyanskii, A.M., The CIS ozonometric network, Meteorol. Gidrol., 1993, no. 9, pp. 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timofeev, Yu.M., Global’naya sistema monitoringa parametrov atmosfery i poverkhnosti. Uchebnoe posobie (Global Monitoring System of the Atmosphere and Surface. A Tutorial), St. Petersburg: SPbGU, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viatte, C., Schneider, M., Redondas, A., Hase, F., Eremenko, M., Chelin, P., Flaud, J.-M., Blumenstock, T., and Orphal, J., Comparison of ground-based FTIR and Brewer O3 total column with data from two different IASI algorithms and from OMI and GOME-2 satellite instruments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2011, no. 4, pp. 535–546. Doi 10.5194/amt-4-535-2011. http://www.atmosmeas-tech.net/4/535/2011/

    Google Scholar 

  • Virolainen, Ya.A., Timofeev, Yu.M., Ionov, D.V., Poberovskii, A.V., and Shalamyanskii, A.M., Ground-based measurements of total ozone content by the infrared method, Izv., Atmos. Ocean. Phys., 2011, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 480–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WMO, Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2002, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report no. 47, Genewa: WMO, 2003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya. A. Virolainen.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © Ya.A. Virolainen, Yu.M. Timofeyev, A.V. Poberovsky, 2013, published in Issledovanie Zemli iz Kosmosa, 2013, No. 4, pp. 83–91.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Virolainen, Y.A., Timofeyev, Y.M. & Poberovsky, A.V. Intercomparison of satellite and ground-based ozone total column measurements. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 49, 993–1001 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433813090235

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001433813090235

Keywords

Navigation