Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical characterisation of stainless steel parts produced by direct metal laser sintering with virgin and reused powder

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among the additive manufacturing (AM) techniques for metals available today, laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) is the one that guarantees the highest dimensional accuracy and precision, compared with laser metal deposition (LMD) methods which, however, offer higher productivity and the possibility of repair applications. A drawback of all PBF processes is that all the build volume has to be filled up to the height of the tallest object to be produced (also in the case of a single object), even if not all the powder gets melted to obtain the desired parts and thus it may be reclaimed for reuse. However, excess powder participates in the process so that its chemical-physical characteristics will inevitably evolve through reuse cycles. Therefore, it is necessary to verify whether reusing it for subsequent AM runs is expected to cause a decay of the mechanical properties of produced parts. In this work, the effect of powder reuse is investigated for two kinds of precipitation hardening stainless steel, characterised by different primary microstructures: martensitic (EOS Stainless Steel PH1) and austenitic (EOS Stainless Steel GH1). Together with the variation of powder characteristics, both static and fatigue behaviour of parts produced with virgin and reused powder were compared by means of statistical techniques for data analysis. No significant variation, in terms of mechanical properties ascribable to powder reuse, was observed for EOS PH1, whereas EOS GP1 exhibited a sudden variation of both microstructure, from austenitic to martensitic, and mechanical properties after eight powder reuse times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. eos.info (2013) Additive manufacturing, laser-sintering and industrial 3D printing - benefits and functional principle. http://www.eos.info/additive_manufacturing/for_technology_interested

  2. Khaing MW, Fuh JYH, Lu L (2001) Direct metal laser sintering for rapid tooling: processing and characterization of EOS parts. J Mater Process Technol 113(1–3):269–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00584-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gardan J (2016) Additive manufacturing technologies: state of the art and trends. Int J Prod Res 54 (10):3118–3132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1115909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lutter-Günther M, Gebbe C, Camps T, Seidel C, Gunter R (2018) Powder recycling in laser beam melting: strategies, consumption modeling and influence on resource efficiency. Prod Eng 12(3–4):377–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-018-0790-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sames WJ, List FA, Pannala S, Dehoff RR, Babu SS (2016) The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing. Int Mater Rev 61(5):315–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2015.1116649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Slotwinski JA (2013) Materials standards for additive manufacturing lecture, Engineering Lab. NIST http://www.nist.gov/document/slotwinski-nist-am-materialspdf

  7. Cordova L, Campos M, Tinga T (2019) Revealing the effects of powder reuse for selective laser melting by powder characterization. JOM 71(3):1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-3305-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Denti L, Sola A, Defanti S, Sciancalepore C, Bondioli F (2019) Effect of powder recycling in laser-based powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V. Manuf Technol 19(2):1901–196. https://doi.org/10.21062/ujep/268.2019/a/1213-2489/mt/19/2/190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Quintana OA, Alvarez J, Macmillan R, Tong W, Tomonto C (2018) Effects of reusing Ti-6Al-4V powder in a selective laser melting additive system operated in an industrial setting. JOM 70(9):1863–1869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-3011-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park SB, Road B (2016) White paper: investigating the effects of multiple re-use of Ti6Al4V powder in additive manufacturing. Renishaw Plc: Wotton-under-Edge, UK http://resources.renishaw.com/download.aspx?lang=en&data=83164&btn=1

  11. LPW Technology Ltd (2016) Case study 05: powder degradation. LPW Technology Ltd: Runcorn WA7 1TQ, UK www.lpwtechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/LPW-Case-Study-05.pdf

  12. Nandwana P, Peter WH, Dehoff RR, Lowe LE, Kirka MM, Medina F, Babu SS (2016) Recyclability study on inconel 718 and Ti-6Al-4V powders for use in electron beam melting. Metall Mater Trans B 47(1):754–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-015-0477-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tang HP, Qian M, Liu N, Zhang XZ, Yang GY, Wang J (2015) Effect of powder reuse times on additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V by selective electron beam melting. JOM 67(3):555–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1300-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Strondl A, Lyckfeldt O, Brodin H, Ackelid U (2015) Characterization and control of powder properties for additive manufacturing. JOM 67(3):549–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1304-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Seyda V, Kaufmann N, Emmelmann C (2012) Investigation of aging processes of Ti-6Al-4V powder material in laser melting. Phys Procedia 39:425–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.10.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Waterman P (2017) Reusing IN625 powder for 3D printing: what does the test data say? http://www.digitalengineering247.com/article/stratasys3dprintingsinteringpowderreusestudy/

  17. Hann B (2016) Powder reuse and its effects on laser based powder fusion additive manufactured alloy 718. SAE Int J Aerosp 9(2):209–213. https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ardila LC, Garciandia F, Gonzalez-Diaz JB, Alvarez P, Echeverria A, Petite MM, Deffley R, Ochoa J (2014) Effect of IN718 recycled powder reuse on properties of parts manufactured by means of selective laser melting. Phys Procedia 56:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2014.08.152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Del Re F, Contaldi V, Astarita A, Palumbo B, Squillace A, Corrado P, Di Petta P (2018) Statistical approach for assessing the effect of powder reuse on the final quality of AlSi10Mg parts produced by laser powder bed fusion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(5–8):2231–2240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2090-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hadadzadeh A, Baxter C, Shalchi Amirkhiz B, Mohammadi M (2018) Strengthening mechanisms in direct metal laser sintered AlSi10Mg: comparison between virgin and recycled powders. Addit Manuf 23:108–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.07.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Quinn PT, O’Halloran S, Lawlor J, Raghavendra R (2019) The effect of metal EOS 316L stainless steel additive manufacturing powder recycling on part characteristics and powder reusability. Adv Mater Process Technol 5(2):348–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/2374068X.2019.1594602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sartin B, Pond T, Griffith B, Everhart W, Elder L, Wenski E, Cook C, Wieliczka D, King W, Rubenchik A, Wu S, Brown B, Johnson C, Crow J (2017) 316L powder reuse for metal additive manufacturing. SFF Symp Procedia 28:351–364. http://sffsymposium.engr.utexas.edu/sites/default/files/2017/Manuscripts/316LPowderReuseforMetalAdditiveManufacturing.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  23. Slotwinski JA, Garboczi EJ, Stutzman PE, Ferraris CF, Watson SS, Peltz MA (2014) Characterization of metal powders used for additive manufacturing. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 119:460–493. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.119.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gu D, Shen Y (2009) Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: metallurgical mechanisms and control methods. Mater Des 30(8):2903–2910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.01.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Montgomery DC (2005) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN 0-471-31649-0

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Coleman DE, Montgomery DC (1993) A systematic approach to planning for a designed industrial experiment. Technometrics 35(1):25–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1269285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Palumbo B, Marrone R, De Chiara G (2009) Technological process innovation via engineering and statistical knowledge integration. In: Erto P (ed) Statistics for innovation. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0815-1_10. Springer, Milan

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Palumbo B, Del Re F, Martorelli M, Lanzotti A, Corrado P (2017) Tensile properties characterization of AlSi10Mg parts produced by direct metal laser sintering via nested effects modeling. Materials 10(2):144. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10020144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yaka H, Demir H, Gök A, Akkuş H (2018) Determination of optimum cutting parameters on free form surfaces in terms of form errors and machining times. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci 36(4):1153–1164

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gök A, Gök K, Bilgin MB, Alkan MA (2017) Effects of cutting parameters and tool-path strategies on tool acceleration in ball-end milling. Mater Tehnol 51(6):957–965. https://doi.org/10.17222/mit.2017.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gök A, Demirci HI, Gök K (2016) Determination of experimental, analytical, and numerical values of tool deflection at ball end milling of inclined surfaces. Proc IMechE Part E: J Process Mech Eng 230(2):111–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954408914540633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gök A (2015) A new approach to minimization of the surface roughness and cutting force via fuzzy TOPSIS, multi-objective grey design and RSA. Measurement 70:100–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.03.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gök A, Gologlu C, Demirci HI (2013) Cutting parameter and tool path style effects on cutting force and tool deflection in machining of convex and concave inclined surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5-8):1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5075-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. LPW Technology Ltd (2017) Case study 10: nitrogen vs argon atomisation of 17-4 PH stainless steel and its effects on AM processing. LPW Technology Ltd, Runcorn. www.lpwtechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Case-Study-10-Ar-vs-N-atomisation-1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  35. ASTM (2015) B215-15 standard practices for sampling metal powders. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/B0215-15

  36. Sutton AT, Kriewall CT, Leu MC, Newkirk JW (2017) Powder characterisation techniques and effects of powder characteristics on part properties in powder-bed fusion processes. Virtual Phys Prototyp 12(1):3–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2016.1250605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. ASTM (2017) B822-17 standard test method for particle size distribution of metal powders and related compounds by light scattering. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/B0822-17

  38. ASTM (2016) F1877-16 standard practice for characterization of particles. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/F1877-16

  39. ISO (2011) 3953:2011 metallic powders, determination of tap density. International Organization for Standardization. ICS 77.160

  40. ISO (2008) Standard 3923-1:2008 metallic powders, determination of apparent density, Part 1: funnel method. International Organization for standardization. ICS 77.160

  41. ASTM (2014) A751-14a standard test methods, practices, and terminology for chemical analysis of steel products. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/A0751-14A

  42. ASTM (2014) E1019-11 standard test methods for determination of carbon, sulfur, nitrogen and oxygen in steel, iron, nickel, and cobalt alloys by various combustion and fusion techniques. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E1019-11

  43. EN ISO (2016) Standard 6892-1:2016 metallic materials, tensile testing, Part 1: method of test at room temperature. International Organization for Standardization. ICS 77.040.10

  44. DIN EN (2011) 6072:2011 Aerospace series, metallic materials, test methods, constant amplitude fatigue testing. German institute for Standardization. www.beuth.de/en/standard/din-en-6072/140066421

  45. ASTM (2016) E8/E8M-16a standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0008_E0008M-16A

  46. ASTM (2015) E466-15 Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue tests of metallic materials. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0466-15

  47. ASTM (2015) E739-10 Standard practice for statistical analysis of linear or linearized stress-life (S-N) and strain-life (𝜖-N) fatigue data. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/E0739-10

  48. Montgomery DC, Runger GC (2003) Applied statistics and probability for engineers. Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN 0-471-20454-4

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Guiraldenq P, Duparc OH (2017) The genesis of the Schaeffler diagram in the history of stainless steel. Metall Res Technol 114(6):613–621. https://doi.org/10.1051/metal/2017059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jacob G (2018) Prediction of solidification phases in Cr-Ni stainless steel alloys manufactured by laser based powder bed fusion process. NIST, https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-14

  51. Schaeffler AL (1949) Constitution diagram for stainless steel weld metal. Metal Preogress 56(11):680–680B

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Giuseppe La Sala, Luca Di Matteo and Daniela Di Martino (MBDA Italia S.p.A.) and Michele Fornasiero (Additive Manufacturing specialist on behalf of Dragonfly S.r.l.) for their support in the technological interpretation of the statistical results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical, Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125, Naples, Italy

    V. Contaldi & A. Squillace

  2. MBDA Italia S.P.A., Via Calosi 105, 80070, Bacoli, Italy

    V. Contaldi, P. Corrado & P. Di Petta

  3. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, P.le Tecchio 80, 80125, Naples, Italy

    F. Del Re & B. Palumbo

Authors
  1. V. Contaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Del Re
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Palumbo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Squillace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Corrado
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. P. Di Petta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Palumbo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Contaldi, V., Del Re, F., Palumbo, B. et al. Mechanical characterisation of stainless steel parts produced by direct metal laser sintering with virgin and reused powder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 105, 3337–3351 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04416-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04416-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation