Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-response parametric optimization of squeeze casting process for fabricating Al 6061-SiC composite

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study aims to investigate the effects of process parameters on mechanical and microstructural characteristics of Al 6061-SiC composite fabricated via squeeze casting. Seventeen experiments in total have been conducted according to Box-Behnken experimental design which contained three process parameters (squeeze pressure, melt temperature, and SiC wt.%) while recording the responses including ultimate tensile strength, hardness, and percentage elongation. ANOVA (analysis of variance) was employed to evaluate the significance and prediction capability of mathematical models developed through regression analysis. The results indicate that squeeze pressure, melt temperature, and SiC wt.% significantly affect the responses whereas ductility is drastically reduced at higher concentrations of SiC reinforcement. SEM micrographs of failed test specimen have been found to be indicative of ductile fracture at higher levels of squeeze pressure and melt temperature. The multi-objective optimization problem has been transformed to an equivalent single-objective problem using grey relation analysis. The desirability analysis revealed optimum setting of process parameters which was confirmed to have improved the ultimate tensile strength by 1.61%, hardness by 1.56%, and percentage elongation by 11.11% as compared to the initial setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Sadagopan P, Natarajan HK, Kumar P (2018) Study of silicon carbide-reinforced aluminum matrix composite brake rotor for motorcycle application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94(1–4):1461–1475

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arulraj M, Palani P (2018) Parametric optimization for improving impact strength of squeeze cast of hybrid metal matrix (LM24–SiC p–coconut shell ash) composite. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taherzadeh Mousavian R, Azari Khosroshahi R, Yazdani S, Brabazon D, Boostani AF (2016) Fabrication of aluminum matrix composites reinforced with nano- to micrometer-sized SiC particles. Mater Des 89:58–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ezatpour HR, Torabi Parizi M, Sajjadi SA, Ebrahimi GR, Chaichi A (2016) Microstructure, mechanical analysis and optimal selection of 7075 aluminum alloy based composite reinforced with alumina nanoparticles. Mater Chem Phys 178:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta S, Giri A, Adhikari S, Srivastava V (2018) Development and characterization of in-situ aluminum–titanium carbide composites prepared by pneumatic powder injection route. In: TMS Annual Meeting & Exhibition. Springer

  6. Ghasali E, Alizadeh M, Ebadzadeh T (2016) Mechanical and microstructure comparison between microwave and spark plasma sintering of Al–B4C composite. J Alloys Compd 655:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma P, Sharma S, Khanduja D (2016) Effect of graphite reinforcement on physical and mechanical properties of aluminum metal matrix composites. Part Sci Technol 34(1):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Adebisi AA, Maleque MA, Ali MY, Bello KA (2016) Effect of variable particle size reinforcement on mechanical and wear properties of 6061Al–SiCp composite. Compos Interfaces 23(6):533–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baradeswaran A, Perumal AE (2014) Study on mechanical and wear properties of Al 7075/Al2O3/graphite hybrid composites. Compos Part B 56:464–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Selvam JDR, Smart DR, Dinaharan I (2013) Microstructure and some mechanical properties of fly ash particulate reinforced AA6061 aluminum alloy composites prepared by compocasting. Mater Des 49:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Soltani S, Khosroshahi RA, Mousavian RT, Jiang Z-Y, Boostani AF, Brabazon D (2017) Stir casting process for manufacture of Al–SiC composites. Rare Metals 36(7):581–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. David Raja Selvam J, Dinaharan I, Mashinini P (2017) High temperature sliding wear behavior of AA6061/fly ash aluminum matrix composites prepared using compocasting process. Tribology-Materials, Surfaces & Interfaces 11(1):39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jayakumar E, Jacob JC, Rajan T, Joseph M, Pai B (2016) Processing and characterization of functionally graded aluminum (A319)—SiC p metallic composites by centrifugal casting technique. Metall Mater Trans A 47(8):4306–4315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang D, Zheng Z, Lv J, Xu G, Zhou S, Tang W, Wu Y (2017) Enhanced thermal conductive 3D-SiC/Al-Si-Mg interpenetrating composites fabricated by pressureless infiltration. Ceram Int 43(2):1755–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ghomashchi M, Vikhrov A (2000) Squeeze casting: an overview. J Mater Process Technol 101(1–3):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sarfraz S, Jahanzaib M, Wasim A, Hussain S, Aziz H (2017) Investigating the effects of as-casted and in situ heat-treated squeeze casting of Al-3.5% cu alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89(9–12):3547–3561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Baghi M, Niroumand B, Emadi R (2017) Fabrication and characterization of squeeze cast A413-CSF composites. J Alloys Compd 710:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kannan C, Ramanujam R (2017) Comparative study on the mechanical and microstructural characterisation of AA 7075 nano and hybrid nanocomposites produced by stir and squeeze casting. J Adv Res 8(4):309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dhanashekar M, Kumar VS (2014) Squeeze casting of aluminium metal matrix composites-an overview. Procedia Engineering 97:412–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nie K, Deng K, Wang X, Wu K (2017) Characterization and strengthening mechanism of SiC nanoparticles reinforced magnesium matrix composite fabricated by ultrasonic vibration assisted squeeze casting. J Mater Res 32(13):2609–2620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalkanlı A, Yılmaz S (2008) Synthesis and characterization of aluminum alloy 7075 reinforced with silicon carbide particulates. Mater Des 29(4):775–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu Y, Li J, Yang J, Li X (2016) The fabrication and properties of the squeeze-cast tin/al composites. Mater Manuf Process 31(10):1306–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shalaby EA, Churyumov AY, Solonin AN, Lotfy A (2016) Preparation and characterization of hybrid A359/(SiC+ Si3N4) composites synthesized by stir/squeeze casting techniques. Mater Sci Eng A 674:18–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haider KMA, Mufti NA (2014) Mechanical and microstructural evaluation of squeeze cast Al-4% Cu alloy using a full-factorial experimental design. JOM 66(8):1446–1453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Maleki A, Shafyei A, Niroumand B (2009) Effects of squeeze casting parameters on the microstructure of LM13 alloy. J Mater Process Technol 209(8):3790–3797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Patel GC, Krishna MP, Parappagoudar M (2015) Modelling of squeeze casting process using design of experiments and response surface methodology. Int J Cast Metal Res 28(3):167–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ipekoglu M, Nekouyan A, Albayrak O, Altintas S (2017) Mechanical characterization of B 4 C reinforced aluminum matrix composites produced by squeeze casting. J Mater Res 32(3):599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Feng Y, Geng L, Zheng P, Zheng Z, Wang G (2008) Fabrication and characteristic of Al-based hybrid composite reinforced with tungsten oxide particle and aluminum borate whisker by squeeze casting. Mater Des 29(10):2023–2026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel GM, Mathew R, Krishna P, Parappagoudar MB (2014) Investigation of squeeze cast process parameters effects on secondary dendrite arm spacing using statistical regression and artificial neural network models. Procedia Technology 14:149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ali MA, Jahanzaib M, Wasim A, Hussain S, Anjum NA (2018) Evaluating the effects of as-casted and aged overcasting of Al-Al joints. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96(1–4):1377–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Senthil P, Amirthagadeswaran K (2012) Optimization of squeeze casting parameters for non symmetrical AC2A aluminium alloy castings through Taguchi method. J Mech Sci Technol 26(4):1141–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. GC MP, Shettigar AK, Parappagoudar MB (2018) A systematic approach to model and optimize wear behaviour of castings produced by squeeze casting process. J Manuf Process 32:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Soundararajan R, Ramesh A, Sivasankaran S, Vignesh M (2017) Modeling and analysis of mechanical properties of aluminium alloy (A413) reinforced with boron carbide (B4C) processed through squeeze casting process using artificial neural network model and statistical technique. Materials Today: Proceedings 4(2):2008–2030

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rajesh S, Devaraj D, Pandian RS, Rajakarunakaran S (2013) Multi-response optimization of machining parameters on red mud-based aluminum metal matrix composites in turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(1–4):811–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Karnik S, Gaitonde V, Davim J (2008) A comparative study of the ANN and RSM modeling approaches for predicting burr size in drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38(9–10):868–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pradhan M (2013) Estimating the effect of process parameters on MRR, TWR and radial overcut of EDMed AISI D2 tool steel by RSM and GRA coupled with PCA. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1–4):591–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ragunath S, Velmurugan C, Kannan T (2017) Optimization of drilling delamination behavior of GFRP/clay nano-composites using RSM and GRA methods. Fibers and Polym 18(12):2400–2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kala H, Mer K, Kumar S (2014) A review on mechanical and tribological behaviors of stir cast aluminum matrix composites. Procedia Mater Sci 6:1951–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Su H, Gao W, Zhang H, Liu H, Lu J, Lu Z (2010) Optimization of stirring parameters through numerical simulation for the preparation of aluminum matrix composite by stir casting process. J Manuf Sci Eng 132(6):061007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Testing, A.A.S.f. and Materials (2009) Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. ASTM international

  41. Kasman Ş, Saklakoglu IE (2012) Determination of process parameters in the laser micromilling application using Taguchi method: a case study for AISI H13 tool steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(1–4):201–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mia M, Razi MH, Ahmad I, Mostafa R, Rahman SM, Ahmed DH, Dey PR, Dhar NR (2017) Effect of time-controlled MQL pulsing on surface roughness in hard turning by statistical analysis and artificial neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9–12):3211–3223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Chang C-L, Tsai C-H, Chen L (2003) Applying grey relational analysis to the decathlon evaluation model. Int J Comput Internet Manage 11(3):54–62

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pradhan M (2013) Optimization of MRR, TWR and surface roughness of EDMed D2 Steel using an integrated approach of RSM, GRA and Entropy measutement method. in Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability (ICEETS), 2013 International Conference. IEEE

  45. Adalarasan R, Santhanakumar M, Rajmohan M (2015) Application of Grey Taguchi-based response surface methodology (GT-RSM) for optimizing the plasma arc cutting parameters of 304L stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5–8):1161–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Azam M, Jahanzaib M, Wasim A, Hussain S (2015) Surface roughness modeling using RSM for HSLA steel by coated carbide tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5–8):1031–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yue T (1997) Squeeze casting of high-strength aluminium wrought alloy AA7010. J Mater Process Technol 66(1–3):179–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Moćko W and Kowalewski ZL (2011) Mechanical properties of A359/SiCp metal matrix composites at wide range of strain rates. in Applied Mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech Publ

  49. Zhang M, Zhang W-w, Zhao H-d, Zhang D-T, Li Y-Y (2007) Effect of pressure on microstructures and mechanical properties of Al-Cu-based alloy prepared by squeeze casting. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 17(3):496–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Aigbodion V, Hassan S (2007) Effects of silicon carbide reinforcement on microstructure and properties of cast Al–Si–Fe/SiC particulate composites. Mater Sci Eng A 447(1–2):355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gurusamy P, Prabu SB (2013) Effect of the squeeze pressure on the mechanical properties of the squeeze cast Al/SiCp metal matrix composite. Int J Microstruct Mater Prop 8(4–5):299–312

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bangaru M, Murugan TA, Arunachalam R (2015) Development of metal matrix nanocomposites of AA6061–SiCp using ultrasonic cavitations in squeeze casting process. In: ASME 2015 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Hassan Sarfraz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sarfraz, M.H., Jahanzaib, M., Ahmed, W. et al. Multi-response parametric optimization of squeeze casting process for fabricating Al 6061-SiC composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 102, 759–773 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03278-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-03278-6

Keywords

Navigation