Skip to main content
Log in

On canonical transformations of gravitational variables in extended phase space

  • Published:
Gravitation and Cosmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the recent years, a certain attention was attracted to the statement that Hamiltonian formulations of general relativity (GR), in which different parametrizations of gravitational variables were used, may not be related by a canonical transformation. An example was given by Dirac’s Hamiltonian formulation and that of Arnowitt-Deser-Misner. It might be indicative of a non-equivalence of these formulations and the original (Lagrangian) formulation of GR. The problem is believed to be of importance since many authors make use of various representations of the gravitational field as a starting point in searching for a way to reconcile the theory of gravity with quantum principles. It can be shown that the above-mentioned conclusion on non-equivalence of different Hamiltonian formulations is based on a consideration of canonical transformations in the phase space of physical degrees of freedom only, while the transformations also involve the gauge degrees of freedom. We shall give a clear proof that the Hamiltonian formulations corresponding to different parametrizations of the gravitational variables are related by canonical transformations in extended phase space embracing the gauge degrees of freedom on equal footing with the physical ones. It will be demonstrated for the full gravitational theory in a wide enough class of parametrizations and gauge conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. A. M. Dirac, Can. J. Math. 2, 129 (1950).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 246, 326 (1958).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 246, 333 (1958).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, The Dynamics of General Relativity, in: Gravitation: an Introduction to Current Research, Ed. by L. Witten (Wiley, New York, 1963), p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Kiriushcheva and S. V. Kuzmin, The Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity: Myth and Reality, gr-qc/0809.0097.

  6. V. A. Savchenko, T. P. Shestakova, and G. M. Vereshkov, Grav. Cosmol. 7, 18 (2001).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. V. A. Savchenko, T. P. Shestakova, and G. M. Vereshkov, Grav. Cosmol. 7, 102 (2001).

    MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshits, Mechanics (Moscow, 1988).

  9. E. S. Fradkin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. B 55, 224 (1975).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. B 69, 309 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. E. S. Fradkin and T. E. Fradkina, Phys. Lett. B 72, 343 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. P. Shestakova.

Additional information

Talk given at the International Conference RUDN-10, June 28–July 3, 2010, PFUR, Moscow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shestakova, T.P. On canonical transformations of gravitational variables in extended phase space. Gravit. Cosmol. 17, 67–70 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289311010191

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289311010191

Keywords

Navigation