Abstract
In the recent years, a certain attention was attracted to the statement that Hamiltonian formulations of general relativity (GR), in which different parametrizations of gravitational variables were used, may not be related by a canonical transformation. An example was given by Dirac’s Hamiltonian formulation and that of Arnowitt-Deser-Misner. It might be indicative of a non-equivalence of these formulations and the original (Lagrangian) formulation of GR. The problem is believed to be of importance since many authors make use of various representations of the gravitational field as a starting point in searching for a way to reconcile the theory of gravity with quantum principles. It can be shown that the above-mentioned conclusion on non-equivalence of different Hamiltonian formulations is based on a consideration of canonical transformations in the phase space of physical degrees of freedom only, while the transformations also involve the gauge degrees of freedom. We shall give a clear proof that the Hamiltonian formulations corresponding to different parametrizations of the gravitational variables are related by canonical transformations in extended phase space embracing the gauge degrees of freedom on equal footing with the physical ones. It will be demonstrated for the full gravitational theory in a wide enough class of parametrizations and gauge conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. A. M. Dirac, Can. J. Math. 2, 129 (1950).
P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 246, 326 (1958).
P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 246, 333 (1958).
R. Arnowitt, S. Deser, and C. W. Misner, The Dynamics of General Relativity, in: Gravitation: an Introduction to Current Research, Ed. by L. Witten (Wiley, New York, 1963), p. 227.
N. Kiriushcheva and S. V. Kuzmin, The Hamiltonian Formulation of General Relativity: Myth and Reality, gr-qc/0809.0097.
V. A. Savchenko, T. P. Shestakova, and G. M. Vereshkov, Grav. Cosmol. 7, 18 (2001).
V. A. Savchenko, T. P. Shestakova, and G. M. Vereshkov, Grav. Cosmol. 7, 102 (2001).
L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshits, Mechanics (Moscow, 1988).
E. S. Fradkin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. B 55, 224 (1975).
I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. B 69, 309 (1977).
E. S. Fradkin and T. E. Fradkina, Phys. Lett. B 72, 343 (1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Talk given at the International Conference RUDN-10, June 28–July 3, 2010, PFUR, Moscow.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shestakova, T.P. On canonical transformations of gravitational variables in extended phase space. Gravit. Cosmol. 17, 67–70 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289311010191
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0202289311010191