Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Corridor development in Gauteng, South Africa

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development corridor concept has been regarded as an important development instrument in spatial planning and geography for many decades. Expanding literature on the theme indicates that development centres or nodes play an important role in the establishment of such corridors. Flows of goods and information between such centres are essential in creating conditions that are potentially favourable for further urban development along the communication axes connecting such centres. Combined, the various nodes form a unique flexible exchange environment allowing for dynamic synergies of interactive growth to achieve scope economies aided by fast and reliable corridors of transport and communication infrastructure. In the South African development sphere, there is strong belief that functional relationships between nodes can play a decisive role in the establishment of development corridors. The research showed that the degree to which economic activities are concentrated in the greater Gauteng region; the resulting current or emerging multinodal structural composition; and the flows of economic activities between the various nodes result in the creation of development corridors that channel and focus economic growth between networks of cities. This confirms the importance of corridors as spatial and economic development instruments. The research concluded that the core cities of Johannesburg and Pretoria are the central driving force in corridor development in Gauteng. They feature as the most dominant nodes, exerting great forces of attraction on the distribution of development and economic growth in the region. The research also suggests a degree of polycentrism whereby economic growth is channelled between networks of cities, however development potential is most favourable in areas in close proximity to primary centres and tends to be functionality driven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bähr, G. (1976). Die Achsenkonzeption als Leitvorstellung für die städtebauliche Ordnung in Hamburg. Veröffentlichungen der Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, 113, 201–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, N., & Turok, I. (2001). Central Scotland as a polycentric urban region: useful planning concept or chimera? Urban Studies, 38(4), 697–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten, D. F. (1994). Network cities: creative urban agglomerations for the 21st century. Sprawl a compact history. Stockholm: Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L. (1959). Ribbon developments in the urban business pattern. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, XLIX, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudeville, J. R. (1974). Problems of regional economic planning. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, J. W. M. (1998). Draft report on the study tour of South African Urban Spatial Development Initiatives. Pretoria: TRC Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R., & Rietveld, P. (1998). The concept of network synergies in economic theory: Policy implications. In K. Button, P. Nijkamp, & H. Priemus (Eds.), Transport networks in Europe (pp. 57–83). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of network society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller, W. (1933). Central places in Germany. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • CoCT (City of Cape Town). (2012). Cape Town spatial development framework. Western Cape Province, City Space, Planning Cape Town.

  • Crush, J., Williams, V., & Peberdy, S. (2005). Migration in Southern Africa. A paper prepared for the Policy Analysis and Research Programme of the Global Commission on International Migration. http://womin.org.za/images/impact-of-extractive-industries/migrancy-and-extractivism/Crush%20%20Williams%20and%20Peberdy%20-%20Migration%20in%20Southern%Africa.pdf.

  • CSIR (Council for Scientific and Industrial Research) (2013). Overview: South African functional settlement typology & analyses. Pretoria: Spatial Planning and Systems.

  • Doxiadis, C. A. (1969). A city for human development. Ekistics, 25, 374–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxiadis, C. A. (1970). Man’s movement and his settlements. Ekistics, 29(174), 296–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fauvell-Aymar, C., Hartmann-Pickerill, R., & Wendy Landau, W. (2014). Migration and employment in South Africa: An economic analysis of domestic and international migrants. MiWORC Report. Migrating for Work Research Consortium. http://www.miworc.org.za/docs/MiWORC-Report-6.pdf.

  • Fensham, J. (1998). Wetton Corridor Project: Urban management.

  • Friedmann, J. (1966). Regional development policy: A case study of Venezuela. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1972). A general theory of polarized development. In Hansen, N.M. (Ed.), Growth centers in regional economic development. New York: The Free Press.

  • Fujita, M., & Thisse, J. F. (1996). Economies of agglomeration. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 16(1), 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, H. S. (1988). The development axis as a development instrument in the Southern African development area. Development Southern Africa, 4(2), 271–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, H. S. (1989). The terminology, definition and classification of development axes. The South African Geographer, 16(1/2), 106–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, H. S. (2008). The Urban Function Index of the urban system of South Africa. Statistics South Africa.

  • Geyer, H. S., du Plessis, D. J., Geyer, H. S. Jr., van Eeden, A. (2012). Urbanisation and migration trends in South Africa: Theory and policy implications. In OECD redefining “Urban”: A new way to measure metropolitan areas, OECD, pp. 58–89.

  • Geyer, H. S, Jr, Geyer, H. S., du Plessis, D. J., & van Eeden, A. (2012). Differential urbanisation trends in South Africa—National, regional and local equivalents. Environment and Planning A, 44(12), 2940–2956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, H. S, Jr, & Geyer, H. S. (2015a). Disaggregated population migration trends in South Africa between 1996 and 2011: A differential urbanisation approach. Urban Forum, 26(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, H. S, Jr, & Geyer, H. S. (2015b). Polarisation reversal in South Africa: How widespread is the trend? South African Journal. doi:10.1080/03736245.2015.1028986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, H. S., Geyer, N. P., & Geyer, H. S. Jr. (2015). The South African functional metropolis—A synthesis. Journal of Town and Regional Planning (in print).

  • Geyer, H. S., & Steyn, H. S. (1989). The measurement of intra-metropolitan geo-economic space in South Africa: The PWV area as an example. Journal of Town and Regional Planning, 26, 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann, J. (1961). Megalopolis: The urbanized North-eastern Seaboard of the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, D. J., & Dender, K. (2010). Estimating the agglomeration benefits of transport investments: some tests for stability. London: Imperial College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (1996). Telecommunications and the city: Electronic spaces, urban places. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett, P. (1983). Geography a modern synthesis (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohenberg, P. M., & Lees, L. M. (1985). The making of Urban Europe: 1000–1950. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover, E. M. (1937). Location theory and the shoe and leather industries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, P. (2004). Endogenous growth, productivity and economic policy: A progress report. Rhode Island: Brown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, R. M. (1924). Principles of city land values. New York: Real Estate Record Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1956). Location and space-economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloosterman, R. C., & Lambregts, B. (2001). Clustering of economic activities in polycentric urban regions: The case of the Randstad. Urban Studies, 38(4), 717–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, T. P. (1976). Grundsätze für die Verwendung von Achsen in der Landesplanung auf Grund von Erfahrungen in Schleswig-Holstein. Veröffentlichungen der Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, 113, 181–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, T. (1999). Mdantsane-East London Development Corridor progresses in East London.

  • Lösch, A. (1954). The economies of location. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrian, B., Freeman, P., & Ziv, J. C. (2001). Towards a general theory of corridor development in South Africa. In CSIR Transportek, 20th South African Transport Conference South Africa, ‘Meeting the Transport Challenges in Southern Africa’.

  • Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, J. (1996). Implications of new trade and endogenous growth theories for diversification policies of commodity-dependent countries. UNCTAD/OSG/DP/122.

  • McCann, P. (2004). Urban and regional economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijers, E. (2004). Polycentric urban regions and the quest for synergy: Is a network of cities more than the sum of the parts. Urban Studies, 42(4), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nafziger, E. W. (2006). Economic development (4th ed.). Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, P. (2003). The growth story: Canada’s long-run economic performance and prospects. International Productivity Monitor Number, 7, 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oranje, M. C. (1995). The need for an appropriate system of urban development control: Arguments and characteristics. Town and Regional Planning, 39, 22–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (2009). Urban geography: A global perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, J. (1969). Comment on the corridor concept. Ekistics, 28, 354–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. B. (2002). Agglomeration economies: Amgiguities and confusions. Environment and Planning, 34(4), 717–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perroux, F. (1955). Note sur la notion de pole de croissance. Economie appliqué, 7(1/2), 307–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pottier, P. (1963). Axes de communication et developpement economique. Revue Economique, 14(1), 58–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenburg, M. T. (2014). Gravity model, predict the movement of people and ideas between two places. www.Geography.about.com/librart/weekly/aa031601a.htm.

  • South Africa (1975). National physical development plan. Office of the Prime Minister. Government Printer. Pretoria.

  • South Africa (1980). A spatial development strategy for the PWV-complex. Office of the Prime Minister. Government Printer. Pretoria.

  • South Africa (1981). Good hope plan of South Africa. Department of Foreign Affairs and Information. Government Printer. Pretoria.

  • South Africa (1999). National Department of Transport: Moving South Africa: The action agenda. Pretoria.

  • South Africa (2000). Department of Transport: National Land Transport Transition Act, 2000 (Act No. 22 of 2000).

  • South Africa (2006). National spatial development perspective: The Presidency. Pretoria.

  • South Africa (2009). National urban development framework: Harnessing a common vision for growth and development of South Africa’s towns, cities and city-regions. Pretoria: Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs and The Presidency and in partnership with the South African Cities Network.

  • South Africa (2011). The Gauteng spatial development framework. Gauteng Province—Economic Development RSA.

  • South Africa (2012). Statistics South Africa: Census 2011. Pretoria.

  • South Africa (2013). National development plan 2030. Sherino: Printers Boksburg.

  • Taylor, P. J. (2009). World Cities: Organizational Networking and the Global Urban Hierarchy. In H. S. Geyer (Ed.), International handbook of urban policy, Volume 2: Issues in the developed world, pp. 93–127. Edward Elgar: Aldershot, Hants.

  • Tuppen, J. N. (1977). Axial regions: An appraisal of their formation, evolution and definition. Discussion paper in Geography, No 4, University of Salford.

  • Voyer, R. (1997). Emerging high-technology industrial clusters in Brazil, India, Malaysia and South Africa. International Development Research Centre: Nordicity Group Ltd.

  • Whebell, C. F. J. (1969). Corridors: A theory of urban systems. Ekistics, 28, 348–353.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Statistics South Africa, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

    André Brand

  2. Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa

    André Brand, Hermanus Stephanus Geyer & Hermanus Stephanus Geyer Jr.

Authors
  1. André Brand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hermanus Stephanus Geyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hermanus Stephanus Geyer Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hermanus Stephanus Geyer.

Ethics declarations

All the work presented in this paper is our own work and the paper has not been submitted anywhere else for publication.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brand, A., Geyer, H.S. & Geyer, H.S. Corridor development in Gauteng, South Africa. GeoJournal 82, 311–327 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9683-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-015-9683-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation